While we've largely went "Yeah this guy is trying to make us paranoid" and "We shouldn't listen to what he says. Or do anything rash." I think he
also wants us to react not just with
paranoia but with
secretiveness.
i.e. I think it's plausible that he's not just aiming to instill doubt in us... but to trigger "We
must keep this secret; we can't tell anybody! What if the Grey Order kill us?" in us. Which I think is bullshit; as I quoted in my previous post, Algard had brought up the possibility/likelihood of us having the attention of the Plotter, and so on. This even is just confirmation that, yeah, we
do have his attention.
Also, I can't overstate how terrifying it is that this daemon retroactively monologued at us. This isn't meer Horror babbling at us, that's for sure.
Here's a thought; this Daemon
wasn't monologuing us, it cast a "make a person's inner doubts and paranoia act up on them" spiel. i.e. Maybe it
didn't know all that we had done, but instead just hit us with a Cast Doubt/Paranoia whammy? Okay it's probably not quite that, because our belt would have bounced any such spell
but. You know how the Daemonette appeared as a bunch of different people or things, ranging from people to books of knowledge or whatever? And how the Higher Daemon seemed to have eyes that'd be able to promise anything 'though at the moment it only promises pain'?
I think there might be a similar thing for Tzeentchian Daemons too. Maybe they can just sort of cast doubt or temptation unto people or something.
Or maybe the Daemon has a dossier on us, and is pretty good at cold-reading too.
"Should you earn this world through right of conquest, your will here would be paramount. Not because you would be stronger than the Four, but because They want to see what you would do with it. They have worlds without counting where Their will becomes fact, and They have wrung every morsel of enjoyment out of such simple games. If you would take up the crown and with it make yourself the ultimate bulwark against Them, They would whisper and cajole and threaten and offer you every temptation to turn upon your wards, but every 'no' would be a rapturous novelty. All you'd need do to keep this world from their grasp is to stay true to your purpose. And is that not the founding purpose of your order? To be the 'no' in the darkness?"
People have mused on this paragraph as meaning "The Chaos Gods really favor and/or are amused by those who can say 'No' to them" but personally, I think that's bullshit it is peddling.
"When you can be sure of nothing else, be sure of the boredom of the Four. When they want puppets, they have as many of the likes of me as they could ever want. What they don't have is you. Should you be willing to change that, you could command any price. Every price."
See, I've had a different idea about why the Chaos Gods would expend little effort or favor on those who already have no choice to but to obey them, like Fimir or Beastmen.
It's because you don't waste your time and energy on those who you already control; you expend effort and bait on those who AREN'T under your control yet.
It's simple tactics or economics! (Or economy of action?) It's not "Because it amuses them." It's because they are always on the lookout for number one, and that means expanding their influence; and people who live in a society that is twisted towards their design? That's a society, a people, that they don't
need to expend any more effort on.
And this bullshit about "If you were in charge of the world, your will would be paramount; not because you'd be stronger, but because the Four would be interested in what you would do"? Well, ask Be'lakor how well that worked out for him. He reigned as king for a while. Until suddenly he wasn't anymore. He went from being the first and most blessed, to the Four spreading the blessings among many others. While that is mythology and a bit uncertain of veracity, I think it's probably a good lesson anyway.
The 4 are in it for themselves. They aren't going to honor deals unless they
have to honor them, and only so long as it profits them to honor them. And also, there was a comment about how they were the sort of being that wouldn't pick a deal that profited them 99% if it profited somebody else even 1%. Which means any deal they offer is ultimately bullshit in some way.
And, well, of
course they would delight in "somebody who puts the chain on themselves" as opposed to those who have to be ground down first!
Why wouldn't you be delighted to have somebody save you all the trouble and effort and become your slave of their own free will? It's, again, not a matter of amusement (thought it probably
does make them laugh if people fall for some kind of "it's inevitable, man" shtick) it's a matter of "If I can get something for absolutely free, why wouldn't I want it way more than having to work my butt off for it?"