Voting is open
"We're currently occupied with our many domestic projects as a result of the recent war, and expect to be able to provide the care and dedication that the responsibility of mediation requires within the next six months."
sure, that's reasonable.

Now, how many of our political enemies do you expect will be reasonable about this?

A lot of diplomacy has fleeting time windows when things are possible and deals can be cut.
Look at the deal we made with Katrina for a green power grid; if we'd put it off for a turn, it would be gone.
Or the peace treaty we made with the Vics; there's no guarantee we'd be able to make anything so good six months hence.

We cannot interpose ourselves into a diplomatic situation and then tell them to sit down and wait till an opportunity opens in our schedule.
Events have a life of their own.
basically this. I don't think the actions will necessarily disappear next turn, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't at least an higher DC, to signify how thing got worse while we waited to act...

and really, it just looks bad.
 
I assume that time is on our side as long as we continue to reach out to the rest of the country(and the world) and Little Nicky stays on his side of the pond. Unfortunately, Imperial Russia is a factor that cant be predicted.
And depending on how much treasure he is willing to throw at Victoria, assuming that we can grow faster than they can arm is not a safe bet.
If we can't make that assumption, then from my perspective we need to rapidly prepare for a war in five years and need to radically change our plans. Because if we can't grow faster than them even while the Victorians are tearing themselves apart, then why should these potential allies back us to begin with and bet on the losing horse? We need to persuade them that's not the case and that our victory over Victoria wasn't just some fluke. Which means showing our sustained might. That means economic power.

I will say that at this point, our plans aren't that dissimilar. I have +2 to Green Energy, while you have +1 to gunboats and the Minnesota thing. I can concede lowering Green Energy to 2 while adding 1 to gunboats, but I am absolutely convinced we should have at least 2 committed to Green Energy. We have a chance for guaranteed successes here on something which is incredibly useful for us and the entire world in the short and long-term. That's not just something to look at and say "Nah, I'm good."
 
Last edited:
If we can't make that assumption, then from my perspective we need to rapidly prepare for a war in five years and need to radically change our plans. Because if we can't grow faster than them even while the Victorians are tearing themselves apart, then why should these potential allies back us to begin with and bet on the losing horse? We need to persuade them that's not the case and that our victory over Victoria wasn't just some fluke. Which means showing our sustained might. That means economic power.

I will say that at this point, our plans aren't that dissimilar. I have +2 to Green Energy, while you have +1 to gunboats and the Minnesota thing. I can concede lowering Green Energy to 2 while adding 1 to gunboats, but I am absolutely convinced we should have at least 2 committed to Green Energy. We have a chance for guaranteed successes here on something which is incredibly useful for us and the entire world in the short and long-term. That's not just something to look at and say "Nah, I'm good."
-We can grow faster than a Victoria that's tearing itself apart.

We can even grow faster than a Victoria that has stopped tearing itself apart and is healing. But when you have a superpower's military arsenal available to you, regenerating your military capacity does not necessarily bear any relationship to your nation's economic capability to raise or maintain such forces unassisted.

That's why Russia is a wild card.
We'll hopefully be able to get friends/allies of convenience abroad who will similarly assist us in jumping our own economic and military capacity faster than we can do on our own, but thats a hope, not assured.

-Said allies will back us because we will make Victoria, and by extension Russia, bleed.

Some for pragmatic reasons, becuse splitting Russia's attention and resources prevents them from concentrating or distracts them at a critical momet. Some out of moral outrage, like any Africans who see the stories about black people. Some just for revenge; the Chinese have certainly not forgotten the Vics fucking with them back in the 2040s,nor has Cali or France. Countries have long memories.

When the US was backing the Khmer Rouge against Vietnam in the 1970s and 1980s, they certainly didnt expect them to win.Just to bleed the Vietnamese. When the Soviets and Chinese backed North Vietnam, the same dynamic was in play. Winning was a stretch bonus; tying down hundreds of thousands of US soldiers and getting intelligence on their gear was gold.

-The Crusaders torched Augusta and are explicitly called out as doing the sort of infrastructure damage we declined to do. The Vics are going to have to repair that damage, rejigger large parts of their economy, from dumping coal trains and going electric/hybrid, to replacing their vehicle fleet wholesale, to actually setting up local logistics, to training a new army from scratch. Im not even talking about replacing the lost manpower.

Five years is the hard minimum I can see it taking assuming everything goes their way and Little Nicky ensures the resources are always available.
It will almost certainly take longer

-I think Green Energy is important. I just dont think its critical this turn, not compared to things like Refugees or Farming.
In this case I agree with Simon.
Nor am I afraid it will go away due to Plot; we already paid for it, and Poptart is Lawful Evil, not Chaotic Evil.
 
-Said allies will back us because we will make Victoria, and by extension Russia, bleed.

Some for pragmatic reasons, becuse splitting Russia's attention and resources prevents them from concentrating or distracts them at a critical momet. Some out of moral outrage, like any Africans who see the stories about black people. Some just for revenge; the Chinese have certainly not forgotten the Vics fucking with them back in the 2040s,nor has Cali or France. Countries have long memories.

When the US was backing the Khmer Rouge against Vietnam in the 1970s and 1980s, they certainly didnt expect them to win.Just to bleed the Vietnamese. When the Soviets and Chinese backed North Vietnam, the same dynamic was in play. Winning was a stretch bonus; tying down hundreds of thousands of US soldiers and getting intelligence on their gear was gold.
But you're not talking about making allies out of France or China or Africa. You're talking about neighbors who are little better than warlords at this point and actually have reason to fear Victorian retaliation. If Vietnam was capable of destroying or harming the US after defeating the Khmer Rouge, we never would have funded the Khmer Rouge. What you're suggesting is the equivalent of if we had decided during the Cold War to help the Republic of China reclaim the mainland.

As for your claims that the bonus won't go away and that it would be somehow unfair - maybe I'm missing it due to joining late, but I don't see it. You claim that we paid for it, but as far as I can tell, we didn't suffer any penalties for it and in fact have gained some substantial rewards. Some members of our Congress grumbled about it, and Johnson talked to them, and that was about it. And I think that it's pretty obvious that the in-story justification for such a move exists, with the princess being indisposed. We've already seen speculation in the aftermath of this post of how the new Czar loves tearing up deals.

You say that we can hold off green energy until later, but I do not trust us to be able to wait until later. The Minnesota option explicitly states that it will unlock further options, which means more things to distract us from this important thing. Given that I would argue that the possibility does exist that the green energy free roll is not a permanent thing, its importance, and the need to not entangle ourselves endlessly, we need to focus on that first.
 
Last edited:
Do you not understand why Refugee crisis is really bad?

At *least* 10% of our current population, probably much more, are refugees. If you read back through the thread you'll realize that the god damned Unionists managed to fearmonger enough to disenfranchise refugees.
Ease off a bit, yeah? We can assume that all participants can read and parse information.
 
Basically, I'd go for something like this

[] Plan Surge
-[][Defense] More Gunboats (Dedicated AP x1)(Free AP x1)
-[][State] Michigan Mediation (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][State] Intervention in Minnesota (Free AP x1)
-[][Domestic Affairs] Census Office (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Domestic Affairs] Refugee Crisis (Free AP x2)
-[][Domestic Affairs] Economic Legislation (Free AP x1)
-[][Development] Farming Equipment (Dedicated AP x2)
-[][Development] Green Energy (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Development] Midwest Economic Summit (Free AP x1)
-[][Security] Into Victoria (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Technological Recovery] Organize the Libraries (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Total] 8x dedicated AP + 6x free AP = 14 AP

[][SCHEDULE] Seven years.
[][MEET] Yes.

I like 13 out of 14 of your AP. But why x2 in Farming instead of x2 in Census? Farming only needs one more success to complete. And Census has a big bolded warning saying this needs to be done ASAP. It's a solid 70% chance to complete, and I don't think the consequences if we miss will be bad enough to pass up the chance to get Census done in six months instead of twelve.

[] Plan Domestic Diplomatic Development
-[][Defense] More Gunboats (Dedicated AP x1)(Free AP x1)
-[][State] Michigan Mediation (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][State] Intervention in Minnesota (Free AP x1)
-[][Domestic Affairs] Census Office (Dedicated AP x1, Free AP x1)
-[][Domestic Affairs] Refugee Crisis (Free AP x2)
-[][Domestic Affairs] Economic Legislation (Free AP x1)
-[][Development] Farming Equipment (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Development] Green Energy (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Development] Midwest Economic Summit (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Security] Into Victoria (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Technological Recovery] Organize the Libraries (Dedicated AP x1)
-[][Total] 8x dedicated AP + 6x free AP = 14 AP
 
But you're not talking about making allies out of France or China or Africa. You're talking about neighbors who are little better than warlords at this point and actually have reason to fear Victorian retaliation. If Vietnam was capable of destroying or harming the US after defeating the Khmer Rouge, we never would have funded the Khmer Rouge. What you're suggesting is the equivalent of if we had decided during the Cold War to help the Republic of China reclaim the mainland.

As for your claims that the bonus won't go away and that it would be somehow unfair - maybe I'm missing it due to joining late, but I don't see it. You claim that we paid for it, but as far as I can tell, we didn't suffer any penalties for it and in fact have gained some substantial rewards. Some members of our Congress grumbled about it, and Johnson talked to them, and that was about it. And I think that it's pretty obvious that the in-story justification for such a move exists, with the princess being indisposed. We've already seen speculation in the aftermath of this post of how the new Czar loves tearing up deals.

You say that we can hold off green energy until later, but I do not trust us to be able to wait until later. The Minnesota option explicitly states that it will unlock further options, which means more things to distract us from this important thing. Given that I would argue that the possibility does exist that the green energy free roll is not a permanent thing, its importance, and the need to not entangle ourselves endlessly, we need to focus on that first.
1)You are confusing two sets of prospective allies.

Domestic allies are territorial buffers, trade partners, informers and agents, potential new states and citizens. Foreign allies are nations and influential individuals with whom our goals overlap, who might have something to gain from our victory, or might just be content with us inflicting pain on Victoria and by extension Russia at particular times.

2) Uh, what?
You mean like we(the US) funded the mujahideen in the Afghan War despite the Soviets being capable of retaliation? Like the Saudis did?
Like the Pakistanis allowed their soil to be used as training grounds and staging posts for supplying anti-Soviet fighters and cross border raids against Soviet soldiers?


3) The fact that they are small fry by any absolute measure does not change their value to us.
St Louis may be run by what would be characterized in better times as a crime family, but right there on our border they are way more important to us than the regional power that is Egypt 7000km+ away.

3) We took the political risk. Risked the hit to our Legacy rating, and issues with Congress, in order to do it.

We've also been flatout reassured that the money has been paid out, and there's no way for Little Nicky to repossess it.
When there's a risk of shit going away abruptly because Plot, its signposted, like when it was specified in the peace treaty that the bonus AP from Vic reparations can go away whenever theVics get on their feet.

4) If the situation changes, if the optimal choice changes, of course we'll pick other stuff. Thats what reasonable players DO.
We were planning Oil Extraction in Turn 4, but then Green Energy showed up as an option in Turn 5 and we switched to that instead.

The quest players have collectively made generally reasonable decisions given the information at had for the two years this quest has been running.
If something comes up and they choose to do that instead, then odds are that we have assessed the information available and decided that the changing situation requires different choices.
 
I like 13 out of 14 of your AP. But why x2 in Farming instead of x2 in Census? Farming only needs one more success to complete. And Census has a big bolded warning saying this needs to be done ASAP. It's a solid 70% chance to complete, and I don't think the consequences if we miss will be bad enough to pass up the chance to get Census done in six months instead of twelve.
Because it has been pointed out that after Refugees, Farming and securing the food supply is the second most likely topic to cause internal unrest if its disrupted. And spring is when you want your farmers to receive their equipment, not winter.
So suspenders and belt.

Furthermore, demonstrate a secure food supply on top of the availability of electric power and control of trade routes, and multiplier effects begin to apply. Both economically, and politically.
 
Furthermore, demonstrate a secure food supply on top of the availability of electric power and control of trade routes, and multiplier effects begin to apply. Both economically, and politically.
I mean yeah, that's all true. Hell it could even result in a hidden power bonus like we've gotten in terminus quest for completing projects that sync well all at the same time... but on the other hand, if farming equipment fails we'll still be able to feed our population.. And if census gets completed in one turn that opens up a lot of 'stewardship' options for us, or maybe it just vastly lowers our DCs.

To me it's worth the risk to spend 2 on census given the lessened consequences of failure for farm equipment. If they get it in winter, then they'll have several months to figure out how the equipment works and how to keep it running.
 
Because it has been pointed out that after Refugees, Farming and securing the food supply is the second most likely topic to cause internal unrest if its disrupted. And spring is when you want your farmers to receive their equipment, not winter.
So suspenders and belt.

Furthermore, demonstrate a secure food supply on top of the availability of electric power and control of trade routes, and multiplier effects begin to apply. Both economically, and politically.
I'm failing to see why Farming needs 2 AP instead of just 1. It feels a bit much, especially considering the type of language used for the Census Office option I'd rather put the second AP on that. Even then it's only got a 49% chance of completing this turn, but at least we'll have low chance of failing both dice.

Yes, should the Farming AP fail we'll have to try again next turn, but if we only put 1 AP on Census it physically can't complete this turn.
"Madame President, I am sorry, but I must insist on something. We have left off the matter of our civil services for far too long, and we're reaching a critical point, as we reach a time when all of the resources of our nation must be utilized as efficiently as possible towards the end of exploiting our unique and unlooked-for position in preparation for the next war. I insist that we begin work on the Census Office immediately. I am prepared to tender my resignation if we do not.

"Otherwise, we have the continuing matter of the naturalization bill. I do not like its odds of success if my Department does not continue helping that bill through Congress. Beyond that, other matters are starting to arise, as if we needed more on our plate."

This category has one AP.

[ ] Census Office: At this point, your estimation of your population is an extremely imprecise guess. This really is not ideal, and especially with the burgeoning refugee population, you need to be able to keep track of your population and its makeup. It's one of a government's biggest tools for domestic politics. With ambitious plans for economic development and militarization on the table, the Secretary is adamant: this can wait no longer. DC: 30. Successes Required: 2. AP Limit: 2. Effect: Establish a Census Office and finally nail down your population figures.
 
Well, my thoughts:
1) Having to host the conference will cost us AP that we can't use to build industry, improve our military, or just make things better for our people in general. And that's bad. (In fact, it might drag us into even more diplomatic affairs that'll cost even more AP! Just look at how the last conference ended with us having to mediate both the Traverse-MSR rivalry and the stuff in Minnesota.) If someone else hosts it, we should attend though.
2) I want 2 AP on each of Census Office, Refugee Crisis and Farming Equipment. Regarding the latter two, getting a 3rd success on any of them (though hopefully both) is not a waste but very beneficial. Anyone have a plan with this?
 
1) Having to host the conference will cost us AP that we can't use to build industry, improve our military, or just make things better for our people in general. And that's bad. (In fact, it might drag us into even more diplomatic affairs that'll cost even more AP! Just look at how the last conference ended with us having to mediate both the Traverse-MSR rivalry and the stuff in Minnesota.) If someone else hosts it, we should attend though.
You have to balance that with the fact that if we do things right though, it may very well lead to a bunch of the revivalist factions voluntarily merging with us. Giving us more AP, available resources and potentially improving the effect of our current AP. Without having to spend a bunch of AP to do it for each faction as we meet them, whether that merger is diplomatic or militant.
 
Well, my thoughts:
1) Having to host the conference will cost us AP that we can't use to build industry, improve our military, or just make things better for our people in general. And that's bad. (In fact, it might drag us into even more diplomatic affairs that'll cost even more AP! Just look at how the last conference ended with us having to mediate both the Traverse-MSR rivalry and the stuff in Minnesota.) If someone else hosts it, we should attend though.
2) I want 2 AP on each of Census Office, Refugee Crisis and Farming Equipment. Regarding the latter two, getting a 3rd success on any of them (though hopefully both) is not a waste but very beneficial. Anyone have a plan with this?

1)the whole point of taking more diplomatic commitments is that they help us by establishing us as the big player in the area. They're not really a waste, and they can, in time, to lead to further expansion, which usually means more AP (or better actions)

Also the conference would be the perfect place to reveal the Declaration, and doing it to someone else's conference would certainly not look as good.

2)I don't think there is, but really, why there have been very good points made for Census (essential) and Refugee (risky), Farming is being in my opinion overestimated.

Sure, extra successes are nice, and failures are bad, but generally speaking an extra success in an already completed action is worse than a success in an incomplete action, and the "losses" from a failure are limited in this case. If we didn't have access to trade for food in case something goes wrong it would be completely different, but in this case it's an acceptable risk, where if we lose we probably just lose some money.
 
1) Having to host the conference will cost us AP that we can't use to build industry, improve our military, or just make things better for our people in general. And that's bad. (In fact, it might drag us into even more diplomatic affairs that'll cost even more AP! Just look at how the last conference ended with us having to mediate both the Traverse-MSR rivalry and the stuff in Minnesota.) If someone else hosts it, we should attend though.
Diplomacy isn't a zero sum game. Helping them also helps us, both in giving us another ally in the immediate area and allowing us to show off our diplomatic credentials to other factions in America.
 
1)the whole point of taking more diplomatic commitments is that they help us by establishing us as the big player in the area. They're not really a waste, and they can, in time, to lead to further expansion, which usually means more AP (or better actions)

Also the conference would be the perfect place to reveal the Declaration, and doing it to someone else's conference would certainly not look as good.

2)I don't think there is, but really, why there have been very good points made for Census (essential) and Refugee (risky), Farming is being in my opinion overestimated.

Sure, extra successes are nice, and failures are bad, but generally speaking an extra success in an already completed action is worse than a success in an incomplete action, and the "losses" from a failure are limited in this case. If we didn't have access to trade for food in case something goes wrong it would be completely different, but in this case it's an acceptable risk, where if we lose we probably just lose some money.
Farming is less about "Ensuring we don't run out of food" and more about "Creating an excess of crops so we can begin trading and exporting them." While I want to become an industrial powerhouse, farming is something we can begin to make progress and see results on fairly quickly, especially as many Americans will have been forced into agriculture given the collapse. Ensuring the productivity of the peasants is a really important thing for reasons that go beyond merely the food supply.

After thinking about it, I am going to edit my plan so it's:

[]Plan Consolidate and Prepare

2 AP for Gunboats.
1 AP for Michigan Mediation
1 AP for Census
2 AP for Refugee Crisis
1 AP for Economic Legislation
1 AP for Midwest Economic Summit
2 AP for Green Energy
2 AP for Farming Equipment
1 AP for Into Victoria
1 AP for Organize the Libraries

I do think that gunboats is really important because as discussed earlier, I see our main expansion points as being along water - either east along the Great Lakes or south along the Mississippi. Having a good brown water navy will help us in that regard, especially as I believe we need to figure out what tribes are to our south along the river and towards Louisiana. That it's trivially easy to complete is another bonus.



When does voting begin anyhow?
 
Last edited:
Non-Canon Omake: Victoria Delenda Est
Victoria delenda est

Hawkeye. Find attached truth on "We will drive the Blacks out". Standard propaganda drivel, but the truth is shocking enough this time. Can't deny, kinda hard not to believe CMC won't win after a good hot meal. Almost liked my sargaent, had to remind myself that being beaten and starved to death isn't normal .

Augusta is burning . I don't even think it was intentional. Probably some looter, or perhaps Blackie set an accidental fire. There was certainly no orders and a lot of screaming at us to carry shit out of burning buildings.... Bastards didn't even care that women were dying. Another thing to add to my nightmares... The way that wail echoed as the smoke choked and dispersed nearby sound... Making it reverbate everywhere.

The show trials though. That was real. They rounded up "traitors" and strung them from the lamposts and balcony. You should had seen the crusaders spit when we crashed into some general house. It was plated with gold and had crystal chandeliers. For the crime of being the slave of some "kleptocrat who stole from the People", they garotted some actual black people and lynched them.

The CMC doesn't want to stay long. But i just can't see how they can. They taken casualties and have a train of wounded. I begun hearing talks about adminstering christian mercy and I shudder to imagine what that euphemism meant.

Get the news out. Maybe the Russians will take out these bastards. If there is a true God, maybe Chicago will swoop in and murder them just like they did Moses.

We plant the seeds, so our children can shelter under the Tree of Liberty. Be well.


==≠===========

@PoptartProdigy
 
I mean yeah, that's all true. Hell it could even result in a hidden power bonus like we've gotten in terminus quest for completing projects that sync well all at the same time... but on the other hand, if farming equipment fails we'll still be able to feed our population.. And if census gets completed in one turn that opens up a lot of 'stewardship' options for us, or maybe it just vastly lowers our DCs.

To me it's worth the risk to spend 2 on census given the lessened consequences of failure for farm equipment. If they get it in winter, then they'll have several months to figure out how the equipment works and how to keep it running.
🤷
We'll agree to disagree.
This is one of two picks I think its reasonable to be conservative about in this turn; the second being Refugees.
Nobody disputes the importance of Census; I just rather not be reliant on external imports of food by the time winter rolls around again.

And furthermore, excess food is not wasted.
It can be stockpiled against future need, and its an additional trade good, which translates to both money and political influence in the disgoverned United States.
 
"Being reliant on food imports from the international market" is a vastly better situation than "Literally starving unless we buy from near neighbors at extortionate prices". While the Census is vastly more important component of our [X]-year plan than farming - both are good, but if you told me I could only finish one this turn I would pick census every time.
 
Last edited:
"Being reliant on food imports from the international market" is a vastly better situation than "Literally starving unless we buy from near neighbors at extortionate prices". While the Census is vastly more important componet of our [X]-year plan than farming - both are good, but if you told me I could only finish one this turn I would pick census every time.
WoG:
Famine, no. Domestic food shortfalls, yes. Basically, very soon you will not be producing enough food to feed everybody in your territory. The good news is that the Seaway opening up means cheap foreign food exporters who don't feel like charging highway robbery prices like your neighbors (or, indeed, you) did are now available. So, you can buy food, and you can pay for it with the rest of the trade you're now conducting with Victoria. You'd still feel more comfortable strengthening your farming sector, mind; you'd rather be producing enough food that you can make it an asset rather than something you can financially cover. But no, you are no longer at imminent risk of famine.

When a mortal enemy is sitting on your main arterial to the international market?
A basic essential like food is something you dont want to give them the means to disrupt as political leverage, or just to assuage their pride. Or even just a fuckup. Thats one thing I'm fairly sure both Johnson and Blackwell are in agreement on.

And that doesnt even consider the fact that the Welland Canal and the Seaway closes during winter because the Lakes freeze.

You would have a point about using imports as a backstop if we controlled a port on the Atlantic, or if the Mississippi was already secured.
Neither is currently true.

EDIT
Not to mention that if we start importing food with the proceeds of trade with Victoria, I expect it to reduce our AP for the duration
 
Last edited:
Not to mention that if we start importing food with the proceeds of trade with Victoria, I expect it to reduce our AP for the duration
this specifically would only matter if we failed the 1 AP roll, and it would basically balance the AP we moved from food to something else (which is, if we pass the DC, basically an extra AP compared to an extra success on food)
 
this specifically would only matter if we failed the 1 AP roll, and it would basically balance the AP we moved from food to something else (which is, if we pass the DC, basically an extra AP compared to an extra success on food)
Would it?
Or would the price of food rise to match the urgency? What of the ripple effects on the rest of the economy?
When we had to buy food back in Turn 1, we spent 1 AP on buying food, and we lost our economic AP for the next turn.
Unplanned for disruptions are expensive.
 
There are already paying us 2 AP each turn and now with the food 1 AP more, and the lose of Augusta and everthing there, that is gonna be a lose of a few AP per turn
 
Voting is open
Back
Top