that would make more sense, though iirc, what was the fade then?

God deciding that puberty is over and let humanity out of the house to make it´s own decision? Something he extended on the others strong gods?

Or God worked together with others to do that?
In doctrine, probably something like that. In fact, we're not sure yet but it apparently had something to do with two powerful people fighting hard enough to wake Something up.

Oh! On a barely related note, I'm pretty sure that the Knights of Oblivion are trying to unseal an Abrahamic demon, meaning that demon didn't disappear in the Fade, so there might still be some unfallen angels keeping things going.
 
that would make more sense, though iirc, what was the fade then?

God deciding that puberty is over and let humanity out of the house to make it´s own decision? Something he extended on the others strong gods?

Or God worked together with others to do that?
Why assume it was God at all?
Or that there is a God at all?
Maybe it was just natural/magical phenomenom that happened for natural/magical reasons.
Maybe we caused it somehow.
Maybe one or more of the gods who perished in the process started it.
 
Why assume it was God at all?
Or that there is a God at all?
Maybe it was just natural/magical phenomenom that happened for natural/magical reasons.
Maybe we caused it somehow.
Maybe one or more of the gods who perished in the process started it.
1. It being done by God was the assumption/interpretation of the post i reponded to
2. God not being thing leaves the existance and dominance of the abrahamic faiths against all the faiths of which we know the Gods are running around a massive question mark. It just makes no sense for Islam/christianity to be that that strong against faiths with gods if the abrahamic God isn´t at least in some form real
 
1. It being done by God was the assumption/interpretation of the post i reponded to
I meant that that's the story that people would settle on, because God being too powerful for anything to be done to Him without His permission is a foundational assumption of every religion that worships Him. I did not mean to suggest that it is in fact what happened.
 
1. It being done by God was the assumption/interpretation of the post i reponded to
2. God not being thing leaves the existance and dominance of the abrahamic faiths against all the faiths of which we know the Gods are running around a massive question mark. It just makes no sense for Islam/christianity to be that that strong against faiths with gods if the abrahamic God isn´t at least in some form real
I personally read that as being possible interpretation of the people in setting.

Christianity's curent position is only a problem if you assume other gods are actively enforcing their faith.
Which seems to not be the case, and is actually complete opposite of what is happening.
Maybe Yahweh is real, and is exactly as massive genocidal dick as described in the old testament.
Or maybe not, and whole thing is complete fiction.

Either way, existence of Christianity and their current position as biggest single religion (or fifty thousand loosely connected ones, depending on who you ask), is no more a plothole than existence of the British Empire or lack of Pharaohs currently ruling Egypt.
Sometimes shit just happens.
 
I am hesitant to say anything about |YHWH| until we get closer to 'The Big Event'

And that's all I can really say about that
it´s your story and I wouldn´t dream of telling you what to write, this is just a request that you are free to disregard if it conflicts with what you have planned, just, as a personal preference (obviously given my own faith) can you not do any bashing an the like?
I can easily read a story where God isn´t real or not all powerfull but a story where Christ is evil, ala SMT, is a very hard swallow for me
I meant that that's the story that people would settle on, because God being too powerful for anything to be done to Him without His permission is a foundational assumption of every religion that worships Him. I did not mean to suggest that it is in fact what happened.
in that case my answer (the doctrinal assumption that God has judged humanity to have grown enough to look after itself) is still accurate

Christianity's curent position is only a problem if you assume other gods are actively enforcing their faith.
Which seems to not be the case, and is actually complete opposite of what is happening.
again, they don´t even need to enforce their faith in any real manner, them just running around, like we have seen in this story so far, chatting with people, is more than enough to make their faith dominant
Maybe Yahweh is real, and is exactly as massive genocidal dick as described in the old testament.
Or maybe not, and whole thing is complete fiction.
:eyebrow:
That interpretation..... depends very strongly on what you take literal, metaphorical and what you assume is simply hersay and distortion over a couple millennia of retelling.

The bible is all fiction is eh, since certain stuff like the cruzifiction of jesus is a historically accepted fact
 
Last edited:
I don´t get that really. Between two options, i.e. God being real but not almighty or God being not really at all and all the faithfull were following a lie than the later is far worse than the former.
It's more a case of some authors (not all) preferring to just... remain silent on the matter, neither explicitly denying nor explicitly affirming the existence of the Deity Not Appearing In This Film.

I'm not specifically advocating for or against such a stance, just observing that it is quite common.

To be honest, I am not sure if Elohim's preferred pronouns are "he/him" or "they/them". Bible's grammar isn't very consistent in this regard, is it?
After being translated through several languages, including across two entirely different language families (Hebrew isn't an Indo-European language; Greek, Latin, and English are)... Well, I wouldn't expect it.

As for why other deities didn't dominate in big G's absence, there are several possible explanations. Maybe they fear disturbing the uneasy peace with each other; or maybe they just don't want to.
It's more that Christianity and Islam have both gotten huge, and have subsumed or actively crushed the worship of many alternative religions, in ways that an active and aware deity would at the very least see as great disrespect and would not appreciate.

A religion with no magical muscle backing it, so blatantly trespassing on the turf of religions that do have very literal muscle backing them, would be hard pressed to do so well as Christianity and Islam have.

And in all fairness this kind of is a plot hole... it's just a plot hole that some authors would choose to leave unfilled and work around.

Or maybe the remains of their power are only really enough to keep as much influence as they already have and not more.
The specific "Fade" that we know about occurred long after the rise of Christianity and Islam, and so cannot explain it. The various polytheistic gods created by Pandora may well have been growing weaker over time anyway, but we don't have firm confirmation on that. Except that at some point, there was some kind of big ugly conflict among the Greek gods. This was a struggle for primacy between, I gather, Zeus and Poseidon. That's what resulted in Pandora's own death.

But that was a very long time ago- possibly three thousand years, possibly more; the exact timing is ambiguous.

Probably because he doesn't exist. That means he can't make demands of you and is in general a highly convenient thing to profess belief in if you are an important human who doesn't want to be bossed around by the old gods.
Only if the old gods will consistently leave you alone for not doing what they want.

And if they were willing to do that, then "I'm not feeling the whole sacrifice a bull to you thing, Zeus, sorry" would probably be met with a "eh, cool bro, you do you" instead of thunderbolts.

In which case the part where you excuse the lack of sacrificial bulls with a "What Would Jesus Do" necklace is entirely redundant.
 
again, they don´t even need to enforce their faith in any real manner, them just running around, like we have seen in this story so far, chatting with people, is more than enough to make their faith dominant

:eyebrow:
That interpretation..... depends very strongly on what you take literal, metaphorical and what you assume is simply hersay and distortion over a couple millennia of retelling.

The bible is all fiction is eh, since certain stuff like the cruzifiction of jesus is a historically accepted fact
If their followers are then defeated by the followers of this other dude, then maybe that other dude is more worth following, even if you never actually meet them, especially if those followers are willing to bribe and/or threaten people into following the said never seen dude.

Moses was historically accepted fact not that long ago.
But this is not the place of debating the historical accuracy of the bible.
 
If their followers are then defeated by the followers of this other dude, then maybe that other dude is more worth following, even if you never actually meet them, especially if those followers are willing to bribe and/or threaten people into following the said never seen dude.
True, although this requires the immanent gods (that are around) to be very chill about letting a bunch of randos beat up their followers and twist said followers' arms into saying they, the immanent gods, don't exist.

Which, again, isn't impossible, but it's certainly weird and surprising.
 
After being translated through several languages, including across two entirely different language families (Hebrew isn't an Indo-European language; Greek, Latin, and English are)... Well, I wouldn't expect it.
Add in the whole metaphor business, it being written by fallible humans who added stuff to for propaganda reasons to it mostly likely and hyped certain things up and I would take the OT in general as at most a very rough outer outline for things and even then I would compare that to jesus and if that sounds like it´s ic to him or something someone made up because the egyptians/assyrians etc were very mean to the jewish tribes at the time


It's more a case of some authors (not all) preferring to just... remain silent on the matter, neither explicitly denying nor explicitly affirming the existence of the Deity Not Appearing In This Film.

I'm not specifically advocating for or against such a stance, just observing that it is quite common.
Hmmm, staying silent on the matter is pretty much synomyounous with the "he isn´t real solution" imo. And you are right, not the first time i saw it either
Moses was historically accepted fact not that long ago.
But this is not the place of debating the historical accuracy of the bible.
no.... no he wasn´t. Jesus however is, by literally all the experts in the fields and we have several non christian sources from the time backing his existence up. Saying he is fictional is.... just irrational given the evidence we have. The extensively discredited jesus myth theory is a conclusion one can only reach through either insufficient knowledge about the facts or severe personal biases about the subject matter.

if you want we can continue this over PM. I´m always happy to share my extensive lists of links of different historians on the historicy of jesus with people who don´t know that much of the time period and have fallen to ahistorical pop culture history perceptions.

(the whole medieval church hunted witches historical pop culture misconception was a big one we discussed a while ago in this thread)
 
Last edited:
True, although this requires the immanent gods (that are around) to be very chill about letting a bunch of randos beat up their followers and twist said followers' arms into saying they, the immanent gods, don't exist.

Which, again, isn't impossible, but it's certainly weird and surprising.
The question is, was every god real?
Because there has been, and is, quite a lot of gods being worshipped.
Greek and Egyptians were, same for Japanese (possibly not all of them, but enough for a pantheon).
And if every god was real, were religions displacing each other a product of new gods being created and old ones dying?

I am aware of the wiki page, i have read it, and yes, you can quote possibly thousands of historians over the decades saying Jesus was historical.
I am not convinced because the evidence i have seen sighted has been, somewhat dubious.
He may, or may not, have existed.
But trying to make anykind of, accurate, account of him through the bible if he did is not one i would give any credence to.
 
I am aware of the wiki page, i have read it, and yes, you can quote possibly thousands of historians over the decades saying Jesus was historical.
I am not convinced because the evidence i have seen sighted has been, somewhat dubious.
He may, or may not, have existed.
But trying to make anykind of, accurate, account of him through the bible if he did is not one i would give any credence to.
with the bible? Certainly not, but the non christian sources we have are enough to confirm that he existed, that he was crucified and that he was baptised by John the Baptist.

I find it somewhat weird that you call sources that virtually all historians, many of who aren´t even christian/western themselves, say are authentic and trustworthy as dubious. Surely literally all the experts know more on this matter than you do, no?

Also i feel like we should move this to a PM
The question is, was every god real?
Because there has been, and is, quite a lot of gods being worshipped.
Greek and Egyptians were, same for Japanese (possibly not all of them, but enough for a pantheon).
And if every god was real, were religions displacing each other a product of new gods being created and old ones dying?
i mean, so far the existence of at least the egyptian gods have been confirmed, plus both a norse and japanese diety showed up so far, hardly unreasonable to assume more are out there
 
Last edited:
Only if the old gods will consistently leave you alone for not doing what they want.

And if they were willing to do that, then "I'm not feeling the whole sacrifice a bull to you thing, Zeus, sorry" would probably be met with a "eh, cool bro, you do you" instead of thunderbolts.

In which case the part where you excuse the lack of sacrificial bulls with a "What Would Jesus Do" necklace is entirely redundant.
While I didn't make it explicit, i'm assuming that at some point people started to fight back against the gods with some success, since otherwise there's no reason for them to have ever stopped ruling at all. At that point, justifying your rebellion against the gods by claiming someone has your back is just a way to make people more confident.

It also means you can answer questions like 'if we successfully rebel against the gods, what happens to our afterlife' with 'don't worry, it's all covered'.
 
Last edited:
A religion with no magical muscle backing it, so blatantly trespassing on the turf of religions that do have very literal muscle backing them, would be hard pressed to do so well as Christianity and Islam have.
It depends on how much magical muscle there is. Gods can't be everywhere, as seen with the Egyptian gods sitting on their thrones and just telling their humans to look for Naru. A large enough colonial project could give them too many fires to put out, and for anything that they're not willing to let go, you just leave Cu Chulainn chained to his rock, put a fence around it, and call it a reservation. Other possible factors include Egypt pounding down any nails that stand too far out and any angels that made it through the Fade sticking up for their absent God's followers.
 
I am hesitant to say anything about |YHWH| until we get closer to 'The Big Event'

And that's all I can really say about that

Given this. My speculation would be that |YHWH| was a the other Lillith that has been mentioned. He does has created a large variety of children (the Angels and in some interpretations the Demons too).
 
The question is, was every god real?
Because there has been, and is, quite a lot of gods being worshipped.
Greek and Egyptians were, same for Japanese (possibly not all of them, but enough for a pantheon).
And if every god was real, were religions displacing each other a product of new gods being created and old ones dying?
That remains an interesting question either way.

There is clear evidence for pantheons not necessarily dying off even though their worship ceases in the lands it used to occupy. Egypt has been a predominantly Christian or Muslim region for something like 1600 to 1800 years, and apparently the ancient Egyptian gods are still going strong.

So it's pretty clear that whatever kind of god Pandora created,* they at least don't need mortal worship to live. Or not the worship of more than a relative handful of mortals, such as could keep their cult practices secret even during times of persecution and official disfavor.

And conversely, the Egyptian gods don't seem to feel the need to exert themselves to promote Kemeticism. Many other pantheon-gods who are still alive are, similarly, doing little or nothing to promote their own worship, even though they could probably get away with at least some of that without really breaching the Masquerade, even if they care about that.

Maybe "having a cult that worships you" is something that goes in and out of style among pantheon-gods, and sometimes they're pretty active in it and sometimes they just feel like it's passe and don't get personally involved much?

Maybe these are quite anthropomorphic gods, psychologically as well as physically, and so as long as they have a source of magical sustenance of some kind, a cult following of a couple of hundred is about as satisfying to them as a cult following of millions, because they don't personally know more people than that?
_______________________________

*(she seems to call them genius loci, which is interesting because we don't normally associate most of the pantheon-gods with fixed locations)

While I didn't make it explicit, i'm assuming that at some point people started to fight back against the gods with some success, since otherwise there's no reason for them to have ever stopped ruling at all.
Insofar as they did rule over mortals, anyway.

It's quite possible that stories of the gods lording it over mortals were in many cases quite exaggerated; they may always have been relatively aloof, with the behavior of the modern Egyptian gods being something of an exception in that they bother to project power through mortal agents over a wide region.

At that point, justifying your rebellion against the gods by claiming someone has your back is just a way to make people more confident.
Eh. Personally, I feel like the message of active rebellion would be better, simply because making up a false deity who confers no powers on their worshippers is likely to backfire as a morale stunt.

If people are used to Zeus periodically showing up in person, lobbing around a few thunderbolts, and date-raping whichever maiden he takes a liking to... Well, if they can figure out a way to not get blown up by thunderbolts, they may well rebel against such treatment. But if you say that you totally have a god of your own who doesn't throw thunderbolts, sooner or later Zeus is gonna start calling that god out, and if it turns out that said god is actually your fanfic character, you lose a lot of credibility.

Given this. My speculation would be that |YHWH| was a the other Lillith that has been mentioned. He does has created a large variety of children (the Angels and in some interpretations the Demons too).
Hm. That's actually an interesting one.
 
Eh. Personally, I feel like the message of active rebellion would be better, simply because making up a false deity who confers no powers on their worshippers is likely to backfire as a morale stunt.

If people are used to Zeus periodically showing up in person, lobbing around a few thunderbolts, and date-raping whichever maiden he takes a liking to... Well, if they can figure out a way to not get blown up by thunderbolts, they may well rebel against such treatment. But if you say that you totally have a god of your own who doesn't throw thunderbolts, sooner or later Zeus is gonna start calling that god out, and if it turns out that said god is actually your fanfic character, you lose a lot of credibility.
At that point it doesn't matter whether you have been claiming to have a fanfic god or not, you need to fight Zeus with your own strength. Claiming to have a fanfic god would be useful for the part before you need to actually punch out Zeus. You know, the part where you need to convince a bunch of people to help you punch out Zeus, by promising them that you both are in the right and for sure won't lose.
 
Last edited:
At that point it doesn't matter whether you have been claiming to have a fanfic god or not, you need to fight Zeus with your own strength. Claiming to have a fanfic god would be useful for the part before you need to actually punch out Zeus.
how though?

Regular Humans fighting gods seems like a pretty silly idea. An ant can not fight a tank after all. And godlike humans would´ve made their mark on history
 
with the bible? Certainly not, but the non christian sources we have are enough to confirm that he existed, that he was crucified and that he was baptised by John the Baptist.

I find it somewhat weird that you call sources that virtually all historians, many of who aren´t even christian/western themselves, say are authentic and trustworthy as dubious. Surely literally all the experts know more on this matter than you do, no?

Also i feel like we should move this to a PM

i mean, so far the existence of at least the egyptian gods have been confirmed, plus both a norse and japanese diety showed up so far, hardly unreasonable to assume more are out there
Almost all historians are not experts on the subject of middle east around 0BC +/- 100 years.
Those who do, are not all (probably not even most) focused on early christianity or the area where he would have lived.
Those who are, and do, will be virtually anonymous that there was a guy who was named Jesus and was crucified (as far as i know, have not taken a sensus).
And they most certainly are more knowledgeable than i on the subject matter.
However, they are not infallible, and my fairly cursory look into the subject matter has left me unconvinced that the matter is as solidly confirmed as most people, including historians, seem to think.

And no, i am not interested in PM conversation, because i seriously doubt either of us is going to convince the other, so let's just drop the subject.
 
Then why are all the gods in hiding? It seems pretty clear to me that someone went and did it, even if I couldn't say how.
the fade?
That happened like multiple millennia after zeus. Most likey it was YHVH or other gods/beings throwing down with them. Just, nothing we have seen so far indicates that non senshi "humans" are capable of throwing down with gods, plus the gods certainly don´t look like they are hiding to me. Freyr and that japanese kami of beauty are fine throwing parties after all


Almost all historians are not experts on the subject of middle east around 0BC +/- 100 years.
Those who do, are not all (probably not even most) focused on early christianity or the area where he would have lived.
Those who are, and do, will be virtually anonymous that there was a guy who was named Jesus and was crucified (as far as i know, have not taken a sensus).
And they most certainly are more knowledgeable than i on the subject matter.
However, they are not infallible, and my fairly cursory look into the subject matter has left me unconvinced that the matter is as solidly confirmed as most people, including historians, seem to think.

And no, i am not interested in PM conversation, because i seriously doubt either of us is going to convince the other, so let's just drop the subject.
sure, i just still find it weird how you think you know it better than all the experts on the subject matter.

In my experience that usually means one is wrong
 
Last edited:
At that point it doesn't matter whether you have been claiming to have a fanfic god or not, you need to fight Zeus with your own strength. Claiming to have a fanfic god would be useful for the part before you need to actually punch out Zeus.
Yeah, but there's backfire potential.

Like, maybe you have a plan for punching out Zeus, but it relies on the cooperation of a large group.

Zeus is at least vaguely aware that you have a mean right cross, so he starts stomping all over the landscape bellowing "SO WHO'S THIS NEW GOD I KEEP HEARING ABOUT, SHIT-TALKING ME!?" He creates situations where this new god, if he is the same general kind of being as Zeus, or a greater and more powerful being, would almost have to interfere to maintain credibility.

And if the new god never shows up, and if there are no magic powers being slung around that are clearly and definitively attributable to the new god... Some of the people you recruited for Team Punch Zeus will start to wonder. They'll question whether the new god is real. They'll question whether you made him up. And if you did make him up, they may be less inclined to trust you as leader of a risky operation to punch out Zeus. They may start defecting from Team Punch Zeus, convinced that the new god cannot protect them.

It's a risky gambit, because it creates the potential for being caught in a very serious lie ("you said the Flying Spaghetti Monster would protect us from Zeus, but he isn't real, what the fuck man!?")

how though?

Regular Humans fighting gods seems like a pretty silly idea. An ant can not fight a tank after all. And godlike humans would´ve made their mark on history
It may well be that the actual power of the Pandora-created gods is considerably less than we might imply. And that a group of well prepared human mages with the right planning and equipment would stand a fighting chance of defeating them or sealing them away.

If we conceptualize the Pandora-created gods as being more like super-wizards and less like unstoppable personifications of the forces of nature, it becomes more plausible that with numbers and prep time, they could have been forced to walk small.
 
Back
Top