I just want Ranma to meet him. Poor guy has a major need for sane, responsible adult who's extra-proficient with martial arts.
That's a good idea. Though I'm a bit unclear on whether Genjuro is extra-proficient with martial arts, or just extra-strong due to a bizarre pseudo-Lamarckian ability to train using action movies.
The mobile game's reaction to Genjuro has been "what the fuck is this guy" twice from what I recall, once by the alternate who's into sci-fi, once by the mobile game's Big Bad when they made the mistake of attacking without Noise. He's probably comparitively less ridiculous here with a bunch of Senshi running around, but I expect him to have reasonably high Prowess and probably a 'Teach/Learn new stuff via appropriate movies' trait.
Probably wants to shore up his durability though, that's how both of his losses hit in canon.
Yeah, and as we've seen, being able to punch hard but having merely squishy human durability only gets you so far in magical girl combat.
I literally don't get why you and ten others are convinced I insulted you.
Do you want to know?
Or do you want to pretend nothing happened and do the same thing over and over and over again?
Please pick the first option, or the second option. #1, or #2?
I'm serious,
@Kkutlord . We've done this dance before, and I don't want to do this dance ever again. I want it to end, one way or the other.
Choose.
Do you want to know what the problem other people have with your behavior is, and work to fix it, so that you can have actual meaningful conversations, and interactions that don't end in other people giving up on you in disgust?
Or do you want the serene joy of forgetting about everything, pretending that nothing is wrong, and pretending that other people are just crazy and incomprehensible for objecting to your
objectively obviously flawless behavior?
Pick one. #1, or #2?
I also don't get why you're insistent I do that in-thread. I apologize, I still don't get why your response was to throw out essays insisting I'm a horrible human being.
I literally didn't do that, and you
know I literally didn't do that if you
actually read the essays, which I suspect that you did not.
If you want to know what I
actually did, instead of retconning it all in your mind to "Simon just likes to inexplicably insist that I'm a horrible human being for no reason when I'm obviously right about everything and inherently a good person who only ever does good things," then you're going to need to pick Door #1.
That is to say, the door where you admit that yes, you actually did a thing that is actually a problem, and that you should stop doing that.
...
Just typing the words "I apologize" isn't the point. I didn't even
ASK you to apologize, strictly speaking. I asked you if you were willing to.
So far, you seem pretty unwilling- in that you insist that the only reason you're "apologizing" is because you're convinced you'll get in trouble from an outside authority. You have shown no interest in
understanding why there is a problem, and no willingness to acknowledge that your own choices or behavior might be part of that problem.
...
I don't actually care if you "apologize" or not.
Literally the only thing that matters to me is whether you are even willing to
begin the process of learning from experience how to actually avoid offending others, and how to engage with others constructively.
Because if you refuse to learn, on the grounds that learning would entail admitting mistakes, then there really isn't much point in my ever speaking to you again.
So which will it be?
Door #1, where you acknowledge the possibility of making mistakes and try to learn by asking other people what went wrong?
Or Door #2, where you blithely change the subject, erase from your mind any evidence against your opinions and any criticism of your behavior, and just keep cruising along in a happy blur of self-satisfaction until the next time someone disagrees with you, which they are
obviously doing for no comprehensible reason other than their own bad heart and bad soul?
Pick one.