- Location
- Italy
are you really quoting tvtropes on a complex and currently completely theoretical problem?@QTesseract @Pittauro that's how life works. Think about how often and how many spawn are born to creatures of different lifespans. Here: Immortality Procreation Clause.
also, go down below to the "real life" section, you'll find these:
- Thought experiments on population growth rates suggest that extending lifespan needn't necessarily produce an Explosive Breeder, as it's really the age at first reproduction that determines how fast a population grows. Mathematically, having a breeding female live forever will do less to increase birth rates than having her produce a daughter (who'll breed early in turn) slightly sooner.
- This idea is truth in television in human communities insomuch as the childbirth rate of a country appears to be inversely related to its average lifespan. This is attributed to things like education, not seeing everyone around you die young (which tends to cause survivor lust), and good healthcare that improves lifespans and reduces infant mortality, meaning people don't need to have as many children to guarantee some survive. More developed countries also tend to have less of a primary-industry focus, meaning children are a net drain on assets rather than a source of income. State welfare and wealth in general also means parents aren't as reliant on children to support them in their old age.
Honestly, If I were to take this seriously, I'd say the birthrates in a society of immortals would completely depend on the culture.
And, more personally (and possibly selfishly), I'd be fine with a stagnant society if that meant I get to live in it forever, as long as it's a decently good society.
Not that I believe such a society would NECESSARILY be stagnant, really. It depends again on too many factors to count, starting from its culture, laws, financial incentives..
Actually, their are established polities that remember the silver millenium.
*points to all the patrons of the Pretty Cures* I'm fairly sure we have evidence/confirmation that they are familiar with or knew the Silver Millenium on some level?
We get ten magical kingdoms going "nah, this is legit, they were here before you" it, uhh, kinda hard to argue with that.
kingdoms that are not yet in contact with mundane governments, to be fair.
I wonder how that went actually. Was it faked? Did they find the ruins? Cause we might have to slap a bitch if America is trying to claim them.
Maybe they simply landed far from them.
I mean, the ruins are more or less ONE CASTLE. That's not that big, they might not have noticed it yet. There might even be some kind of barrier hiding it, who knows.
Biology doesn't mean anything when we're talking about MAGICAL LIFE-EXTENSIONS, and I very much doubt there's PROOF of psychology working like that. And in any case it depends on the culture, really.it's not philosophy advice. It is how Biology and Psychology work.
To be fair, we don't know if they're actually immortal, or just long lived, but I don't think it really matters that much.I mean, I find myself profoundly unconvinced. For one, in story senshi are immortal already, and they haven't given up on change, before or after their reincarnation. In real life, there's no evidence of lives getting longer decreasing innovation and change (and a gret deal of evidence to the contrary), so there isn't a trendline you can extend. Insofar as there's a logical argument supporting it, it's one that begs the question; the logic only holds if you sneak the conclusion into your premises.