"That's not wrong, but it's too simple," replied the Grinning Moon. She walked along the manor walls that lined the street, arms behind her back as the balanced on the narrow construction. "They're comfortable is all."
"How can that be a problem?" LIng Qi asked, giving the spirit a confused look.
"Well," said the Grinning Moon, drawing out the word. "It's all perspective, you know? But think of it like this, an ambitious person might cause damage in their reaching out, and a cautious person might cause harm in missing opportunities. A comfortable person, someone who is content with how things are, they'll cause harm by rejecting anything that might impugne their comfort, good or bad."
Ling Qi looked ahead to where cleanliness and luxury began to give way to outright opulence as the buildings grew taller and more ornate. Still, although she could see the thrust of the spirits words, she couldn't bring herself to agree. "There's nothing wrong with being happy with what you have. If you can't take a break to enjoy the fruits of your work, what's the point?"
"My sister simplifies too much," the Hidden Moon smoothly replied. "Just as cowardice is caution in the excess, stagnation is the true vice, not mere contentment."
So, uhhh......What brought this one on? Cause for the longest time, I thought of Ling Qi as the kind who doesn't understand why people grow content with their position. So for her to start questioning "what's wrong with being comfortable and being content with where you are?" kinda confuses me a bit considering how she reacted to some cultivators who are content with their level.
just a fun side note, borges wrote about this (sort of, his library was a library that included all possible text). such a library includes its own catalog, a catalog of all possible catalogs, the mathematical proof that the catalogs of the library and of catalogs are incomplete, the proof reasserting the catalog's completion...a cultivator library could get weirdImagine a magical library containing a copy of every piece of paper ever written or typed.
if you buy into that then you have to admit that the inclusion of that same information was already political, which removes the possibility for you to accuse book-destruction of sinDestroying information like this is almost always a political move.
Unifying Ling Qi's character arc of her choice of patron Moons with her Home Domain, I see. The common core of what the Moons mean to Ling Qi is safety; if the Moon governs Mystery, then the phase Ling Qi is building governs the mystery of safety: what drives someone to want it, what being safe looks like, how to attain it.The Grinning Moon was her desire for agency in her own life, of being in control of the world within the reach of her arms. The Hidden Moon was her caution, the desire to build a place of safety, either within or without. The Dreaming Moon was her the desire to grasp for more, seeking always the lights beyond her reach.
...Because, due to Ling Qi's choices, particularly in her emphasis — or non-rejection — on friendship and unity with spirits, she'll inexorably come into conflict with the Imperial throne and their anti-spirit/human-supremacy stance."It is not something to concern yourself over just yet," the Dreaming Moon said.
So, uhhh......What brought this one on? Cause for the longest time, I thought of Ling Qi as the kind who doesn't understand why people grow content with their position. So for her to start questioning "what's wrong with being comfortable and being content with where you are?" kinda confuses me a bit considering how she reacted to some cultivators who are content with their level.
It does not follow that if the banning of certain books and information is political, then the inclusion of those books previously is political. Those two concepts, banning of information and inclusion of information, are completely different and to draw a connection between them seems strange. There would be a connection if there was information that indicated that the previous dynasties required the inclusion of those texts in the libraries (as that would draw a connection between the political actions of the dynasty) but no such information seems to exist.if you buy into that then you have to admit that the inclusion of that same information was already political, which removes the possibility for you to accuse book-destruction of sin
but there are nonpolitical reasons of practicality, of obsoletion, of damage for books to be destroyed. text is constantly destroyed and renewed. when we discard alchemical texts from mainstream inclusion in science it's not because we're politically conspiring against the alchemists. it's just fact, simple physics, that you can't transmute gold from lead without some very expensive electron-rejiggering far beyond the capabilities of guys messing with sulfur salts. the organism of culture must always reconstitute itself anew. the Empire's communications systems are an example of this—people build talismans specific to their own methods and lenses and the Ministry of Communication somehow cobbles those people's incompatible and irreplaceable systems together into a functional post, even as old contributors die and the new blood isn't quite able to fulfill the exact same needs in the same way.
it's a simple fact that the laws of physics in FoD-world change every once in a while. the stars used to kill you if you stood outside at night until someone ascended to create a magical ozone layer. and that's true not just for the laws of physics but also the laws of meaning and symbol. the Bloody Moon now is different from the old one. it's different for reasons that could be seen as political, but the fact of that origin doesn't change the fact of that difference. texts need to be updated to fit reality as it is now, not as it was. the old texts are simply wrong. they might have value, of a sort, but they don't provide knowledge anymore. you can read the alchemical texts, and get a lot out of them. they're very interesting and have a spiritual component in addition to their scientific basis. but what you get out of them isn't going to reflect the world, it's going to reflect you the reader.
if you buy into that then you have to admit that the inclusion of that same information was already political, which removes the possibility for you to accuse book-destruction of sin
but there are nonpolitical reasons of practicality, of obsoletion, of damage for books to be destroyed. text is constantly destroyed and renewed. when we discard alchemical texts from mainstream inclusion in science it's not because we're politically conspiring against the alchemists. it's just fact, simple physics, that you can't transmute gold from lead without some very expensive electron-rejiggering far beyond the capabilities of guys messing with sulfur salts. the organism of culture must always reconstitute itself anew. the Empire's communications systems are an example of this—people build talismans specific to their own methods and lenses and the Ministry of Communication somehow cobbles those people's incompatible and irreplaceable systems together into a functional post, even as old contributors die and the new blood isn't quite able to fulfill the exact same needs in the same way.
it's a simple fact that the laws of physics in FoD-world change every once in a while. the stars used to kill you if you stood outside at night until someone ascended to create a magical ozone layer. and that's true not just for the laws of physics but also the laws of meaning and symbol. the Bloody Moon now is different from the old one. it's different for reasons that could be seen as political, but the fact of that origin doesn't change the fact of that difference. texts need to be updated to fit reality as it is now, not as it was. the old texts are simply wrong. they might have value, of a sort, but they don't provide knowledge anymore. you can read the alchemical texts, and get a lot out of them. they're very interesting and have a spiritual component in addition to their scientific basis. but what you get out of them isn't going to reflect the world, it's going to reflect you the reader.
Another hotly contested vote I see.
I don't think I'd categorize this as "quite a bit". The vast majority of people visiting such a library would find such things worse then useless; their existence actively hinders the pursuit of knowledge. It might have some value to an archaeologist in the far future, perhaps - but by this same logic those archaeologists would also be interested in your household trash, and nobody considers it a tragedy when you throw that out to be disposed of.Those things still have quite a bit of value though. Knowing what people bought. Knowing what people wrote in their free time. Knowing what people where sketching. All of these things let the people of tomorrow know what the people of today were really concerned about.
As long as storage is cheap, that is a reasonable position to take. Keep everything, on the off-chance that you will need it. Might as well; not like it costs you anything meaningful.Sure they do take up valuable space in the main section of the library so you box them up and send them into the archives. It doesn't really matter if it seems silly or stupid because that is not really the libraries call. There may be a use for it someday and so the information is stored.