- Location
- United States of America
Your equating suitability with 'improve in her own niche effect.' Why? What evidence supports that? Moon Qi could do something completely different in regards to Sixiang. It could make her more of who she is and if she already has a lot of breadth like your original post attributed to her, then couldn't moon qi be the one to give more breadth and Foundation qi more specialization?It's not an assumption that 'Moon Qi' would make Sixiang stronger in her niche. My argument isn't that Foundation Qi does nothing, but your argument seems to be that Moon Qi does nothing. There is plenty of people like @Ayashi or @wingstrike96 who believes Foundation Qi actually is key to advancement, or that Breadth is good in and of itself, and those are probable belief.
Obviously Foundation Qi will give a better, more solid ground to continue building upwards. That is what foundation is. However, the argument that 'Foundation Qi' is both Foundation and Specialised to Sixiang is ignoring the both Ling Qi's belief about the vote and the meta-narrative of voting itself. Likewise, Foundation Qi won't 'make the most out of it'. That's Potency. It's back to the argument we have had in every single ambiguous vote where "This option is actually all the options". No it isn't.
Foundation Qi is best for foundation, Moon Qi is best for Sixiang's own niche, and Potency is best for actual Potency. There is no reasonable argument that Moon Qi is better for foundation, or that Zeqing's site is better for specialisation, or that Foundation Qi is better for Potency.
This means that Zeqing's site will have the most potent effects, moon site will have the most 'improve in her own niche effect', and Foundation will have the most 'grounding'.
There seems to be no factual support for Moon Qi improving Sixiang's niche. So why do you keep saying it?