but we are not telling her to do as she sees fit, we are telling her to join our performance as she sees fit.
The problem here is that music is a one way street and we dont know if that good faith would be reciprocated. Moreover, not only do social combat Arts exist, this is a diplomatic summit she knowingly went to so she would absolutely have such things equipped.
She recognized Zeqings influence, who you may have forgotten, is so alien to the normal human mindset that the very act of teaching Ling Qi and helping Hanyi grow killed her because she denied her instincts to eat them both
Yan Renshu had two or three legitimate contracts of such a nature at Green 1 or Green 2. It's what kept his entire scam running, and their primary limitation was distance.
I never said mind control was the threat
And if there is to be any such Art, itd be a Social Combat one, and if there were any situation where you would be expected to bring along such an Art itd be a diplomatic summit.
Please dont ask me if I'm making an argument I've never made even if you're just doing it rhetorically
I am going to be honest. This is the most ridiculous argument I have heard in a long time. There is no evidence to show that Ice witch can do that. There is no evidence that it only takes words to create a binding contract.
It's a worst case scenario, and Yrsillar has had to directly warn us off making similar assumptions
Then don't force.me.to monofocus on it.
Because we genuinely don't need help?
It's fine to be cautious. It's not fine to argue in bad faith and that is what I think you are doing. Both votes have good intentions, but you have dismissed all of the help votes and then bully people into arguing with you about these extreme examples you create. You created the scenario so you have to convince us why we should take it seriously which you haven't done. Instead you are screaming about other people trying to force you to justify it when you created it. If you want us to take it seriously you have to provide evidence as to why.
Your the one pigeonholing people into arguments. You have dismissed all the other arguments and are trying to force people into the extreme examples.
No I'm not?
...How am I bullying them.
First and most recent examples of which. Along with a bunch of other such posts when I was arguing with Glassskull
Well... Here's one where you are literally threatening someone. The vast majority of your posts these last few votes feel like you're screaming at someone and are truly unpleasant to read. Perhaps it's cultural barrier, but to me you have been consistently condescending and filled with vitriol towards anyone that has posted reasonable objections and even worse towards those that had unreasonable objections. You have been very very nasty these last few days.
And then I took it up.with him in private and resolved the matter amicably with him rather than leaving it to fester in the thread as a potential misunderstanding.
Here is another example of you being condescending. You are also using a strawman argument here. Singling out that one specific example and claiming that you already patched it up, which I should say is something bullies say all the time, 'We're pals now', without engaging the meat of the argument about your uncalled for aggressive tone and condensation. To me this reply is just another example of bad faith argument, just about your very unpleasant attitude instead of the vote.
So let me see if I understand this correctly:
That's why I approval voted for both?
Except we dont need her help?
