Does our father have a version of Mao's red book? If not can we make our own with our own communist philosophies and theories?
Oh and don't forget the poetry as well.
Oh and don't forget the poetry as well.
I agree with you that it's pretty clear we are never going to be able to match anyone who isn't our size in a straight engagement, so any navy we make to defend against the US or other countries is going to have to be focused around asymmetric warfare. So much more focus on numbers of DDs with ASM and submarines capable of ambush attacks. We are probably going to want to get at least one of each eventually, but whichever one we make first depends on the tradeoffs between them. Surface ships are probably going to carry more firepower than submarines and be somewhat cheaper, but are much easier to detect and sink, while being easier to defend against on the enemy's side. Submarines of similar size are going to cost a bit more due to the extra machinery needed, and can't carry as much boom, but are much harder to defend against and have a good chance of not being found and sunk in the first place.So, my basic thing is that we will never really be all that strong in a stand up fight.
But... why would we want to do land attack? It's supposed to interdict enemy ships before they reach our shores?
It could patrol rivers but I'm not sure why we'd need to.
Do we have any strategically important rivers? Any naval invasion we face is likely going to land on one of the two large sides since going through either of the straights if you don't have to is a horrible idea, so any major rivers could probably be bypassed by just landing north/south of them.Tbh Im thinking of worst case, like being unable to repel a naval attack, or maybe an airborne assault on the island. In such an event they'd be useful in defending river crossings or bridges. Or even river escorts in case we ever want to use our rivers as alternative convoy highways via river barges.
I mean, im hoping it never comes to that, but if we're making them modular, I just thought it wouldnt be too much of a hassle to maybe get a few artillery sets should we ever need em. They'd probs be faster to get in position that regular arty when it comes to assaulting or defending river or riverside locations.
Do we have any strategically important rivers? Any naval invasion we face is likely going to land on one of the two large sides since going through either of the straights if you don't have to is a horrible idea, so any major rivers could probably be bypassed by just landing north/south of them.
As for transportation, it might be easier and more economical to just have large, high capacity cargo ships sailing straight up and down the coast to move goods rather than trying to navigate a shallow, narrower, and possible winding river. And in a military situation, assuming we haven't totally lost our air defense, the coastline opposite the one being landed on should still be usable to ship soldiers and goods as it's protected from surface ships because they'd have to pass through the straights to reach it.
I agree with you that it's pretty clear we are never going to be able to match anyone who isn't our size in a straight engagement, so any navy we make to defend against the US or other countries is going to have to be focused around asymmetric warfare. So much more focus on numbers of DDs with ASM and submarines capable of ambush attacks. We are probably going to want to get at least one of each eventually, but whichever one we make first depends on the tradeoffs between them. Surface ships are probably going to carry more firepower than submarines and be somewhat cheaper, but are much easier to detect and sink, while being easier to defend against on the enemy's side. Submarines of similar size are going to cost a bit more due to the extra machinery needed, and can't carry as much boom, but are much harder to defend against and have a good chance of not being found and sunk in the first place.
I like @CyberEnby's suggestion for a light ship too. In the age of missiles, even if it takes 10-15 hits we don't need big expensive captial ships to sink other capital ships. So even if we don't manage to make it fully modular, having a single hull that we can out fit either for anti-ship, anti-air, or anti-submarine duty will allow for more mass production to help bring costs down, rather than having to make an individual class of ship for each of those duties. The only thing I'd consider changing is the tender portion, as that would tie much of our navy's abilities to big, slower ships that are easier targets for any submarine, airplane, or cruise missile. I think that we would be better served by increasing the size of the catamaran to give it more endurance and better stability on the open ocean.
I'm still kind of partial to the idea of making Tigerstripes though.
Tbh Im thinking of worst case, like being unable to repel a naval attack, or maybe an airborne assault on the island. In such an event they'd be useful in defending river crossings or bridges. Or even river escorts in case we ever want to use our rivers as alternative convoy highways via river barges.
I mean, im hoping it never comes to that, but if we're making them modular, I just thought it wouldnt be too much of a hassle to maybe get a few artillery sets should we ever need em. They'd probs be faster to get in position that regular arty when it comes to assaulting or defending river or riverside locations.
I'd say just make dedicated river boats then, it'll be cheaper than using blue water FACs in the role.
Yeah, no we have a big island. Rivers are gonna be an important terrain feature. And those cargo ships would be useless going further inland. Any wide-enough river is going to be an invaluable logistical asset when waging war in Guangchou. So what if they land on a major beach? It would stand to reason that critical targets would be inland, not stuck near enough to the coast for a bombardment. So an enemy would have to get to them via land or air. And with enough rivers, or at least a few of the right ones, by water. Having a brown water navy wouldn't hurt, and the US is gonna find this out thanks to the Vietnam War. We will, too. We have observers there, after all.
So I need this now. I mean, this is bond villain levels of ridiculous and I am here for it! Seriously, if we could get it to work, we could make it even better. We could have a movable trailing edge on the hydrofoil to control whether it pushes the craft up out of the water or down below it. It could ride, fire and then sink beneath the waves in a flash. It might even help with sudden altitude(?) changes when below the waves for evasive maneuversNow, there is one really wacky thing we haven't considered yet: what if we put hydrofoils on a submarine? We have the tech for it, and that way we can make small subs that have great range and speed (on the surface) and then they can dive to get away from surface threats.
You have some river systems, but they, at one point or another, become too small to make any kind of large river-war ship feasible.Ofc, only @HeroCooky has the complete picture of whether or not we have any suitable river networks, but honestly I'd assume we'd have one or two at least.
You have some river systems, but they, at one point or another, become too small to make any kind of large river-war ship feasible.
Oh, BTW, I am currently finishing the first portion lf the next update, and I am in need of either 1d12+4 or 2d100.
Reason: E G G
13 American sailors had an goose egg thrown into their face by the Farmer Wu Chuck before he could be restrained by the Guangchou Army.Let's do that 1d12+4:
So a total of 13! Is that good?! Stay tuned!
Dagnit Farmer Chuck, We coulda eaten those eggs. If you must through Eggs, Make sure they are the inedible ones.13 American sailors had an goose egg thrown into their face by the Farmer Wu Chuck before he could be restrained by the Guangchou Army.
Too late for that, if the 2d100 had been thrown, Chuck would have used his Eggapult against the American Menace.
Eggapult? Do I want to know what that is Really?Too late for that, if the 2d100 had been thrown, Chuck would have used his Eggapult against the American Menace.
@Anon500 pretty much summed up my opinions on our rivers. I just don't think our island geography allows for a strategically useful river system. Judging from Taiwan, we're generally only around 100km wide. That's what, 2 hours drive at non-highway speeds? Moving goods and people overland rather than on rivers is completely feasible at that short a distance. And any river transportation lengthwise is going to have to compete with bulk freighters in the ocean when I don't think there's a town in Guangchou that's more than 6 hours from a harbor/port.Yeah, no we have a big island. Rivers are gonna be an important terrain feature. And those cargo ships would be useless going further inland. Any wide-enough river is going to be an invaluable logistical asset when waging war in Guangchou. So what if they land on a major beach? It would stand to reason that critical targets would be inland, not stuck near enough to the coast for a bombardment. So an enemy would have to get to them via land or air. And with enough rivers, or at least a few of the right ones, by water. Having a brown water navy wouldn't hurt, and the US is gonna find this out thanks to the Vietnam War. We will, too. We have observers there, after all.
Now, the enemy can get throughout the island fastest via air transport, assuming they have enough like the US or USSR would, but those transpos are gonna be juicy targets even for unguided rocket launchers. And when it comes to land, it can be slow, inefficient and dangerous for obvious reasons. River travel wouldn't exactly be safe, either, since a boat would be vulnerable to ambush fire from the shore. So, really, there's no one foolproof way of getting around the island safely. So ignoring the chance to fill in the niche of a river-capable unit would be foolish, when an enemy wouldn't dare ignore one more possible route for logistics or use their own patrol boats for small, quick strikes via the river highway.
When someone gest around to making a movie based on the incident...13 American sailors had an goose egg thrown into their face by the Farmer Wu Chuck before he could be restrained by the Guangchou Army.
Honestly were probably worrying about the wrong thing. The weapons platforms are just one part of a six step kill chain, while scouting and communication (the other 5 steps are all related to these) are areas we haven't addressed at all yet.
When someone gest around to making a movie based on the incident...
They are going to wonder how the hell to portray Farmer Wu Chuck Realistically.![]()
So... yeah, radar, both for air and naval attacks is really important, and we just don't have it. We need something for long range detection, and there is nothing. I am relatively ok if we miss the spy planes overhead, but we really need something long range for our eyes.
We are going to have to start rolling for radar development, aren't we? Or has someone got ideas for a ridiculous version of this that we could use
We don't really need to develop our own, there's plenty of Soviet ones we can use.
Like, designing an IADS for us would mean taking the Soviet S-75, S-125, and S-200 systems and swapping the software over to native electronics, then possibly using Tigerlink to integrate it all into a coherent system where the various radars talk to each other and some of the manual steps are automated (important given our relatively untrained soldiers).
The next step up would be to get an airship based AWACS craft - we don't have satellites and having high altitude airships is the next best thing. It'll also be great for civilian communication and surveying.
And we'll definitely need an interceptor, probably something MiG-25 based, but Iron Tiger tech opens the door to significant amounts of Belkan Witchcraft when it comes to our airfleet.
At sea an ASW VTOL would be great for dealing with American submarines - you can't torpedo something in the air, and if you shoot it down with a sub-launched missile it's got twelve friends who will vector in on your position faster than you can get away.
Hmmm, for dealing with marine surface targets I'm increasingly preferring the Ekranoplan. We can build some very nice hybrid-electric Ekranoplans that keep the turbines high and dry while using electric props that blow over the wings. They'll go way faster than any FAC. And it's not like the FAC will be any more survivable.
Wireless communication technology will be the key button that we need to mash every-time it comes up because that's how we get sensor fusion, and once we have that we'll be playing a whole other ball game than everyone else.