- Location
- Barquisimeto
Huh Alchemist truly is the best dad for Yuffie
That third axis is probably the one that MOST 12 years old can't handle or even recognize.Not strictly true. Outside of the dimensions(or clusters there of) of conceptual alignment the third edition DM guide flat out says that its lawful according to the rules of that society. So outlooks of different societies can flat out see each other as chaotic in their own world view. Its just too in depth for casual play and often subjective. Mostly its relevant for certain spells. Good and Evil can be different depending on the motivations. I've heard of a CE party leader of a LG party. The basic motivation behind an act is important. That party had most of its conflicts over loot resolved by the party law of the CE leader, "If you can't work it out civilly the item is mine now." A greed selfish 'law' that worked as its stupid hard not to look like a moron if you the party leader gets all the loot because you can't control yourselves. Also, hillarious for the party leader to bring that metaphorical hammer down.
However alignment is not a two axis grid. Its three dimensional. The social axis of Law versus Chaos. The ethical axis of Good vs Evil. The third is the axis that RP handles. People can play the exact same character completely different. What I like to call the 'Real person' vs '@&%$#' axis. Its why affable evil is mostly accepted and the stereotypical paladin is a pox upon fun. Also why Neutral Good are called martyrs and are a sever hazard to the party of many levels.
On the mystical level there are absolutes of alignment in those universes mortals aren't that bound by them unless the let themselves be. Also mortals can change alignment and those can mess you up as a character, even without being bound to a philosophy. Even using the static alignments a good DM will inform you your risking alignment change. Unless your moving on the third axis and then your just that kind of character.
You know someone should really sit Alchemist down and talk to him about this at some point because it's starting to become a habit.
"Why do you keep bringing back women from other worlds?"
I think that was pulled from ranma 1/2.Okay, I was searching for these and didn't find anything. Did you make them up or am I just dumb?
Iif you speak about kiss of mariage and kiss of death they are from anime ranma 1/2Okay, I was searching for these and didn't find anything. Did you make them up or am I just dumb?
It is, but in the anime it's implied that the chinese amazon are descendents of the greeks onesI think that was pulled from ranma 1/2.
Where shampoo as one of amazons has do either kiss of death or kiss of marriage
I think the author took from Ranma 1/2Okay, I was searching for these and didn't find anything. Did you make them up or am I just dumb?
D&D alignments are oversimplified so that 12-year-olds can understand them. They are not an accurate moral/ethical measuring device/framework. It'd be like using TableSpoon measurements when doing organic chemistry labs: that's not what they're for.
You really think "not constantly offering to help everyone with everything" is evil, and not, say, neutral?
Oof.
Tiamat would, presumably, be admin, and there seems to be some (albeit imperfect, as seen in Final Fantasy...) separation between staff and clientele. It may also make Terra-tan jealous, which could be a Bad Thing...
/me laughs in current chapter based foreknowledge."There have been some concerns raised in regards to your... Proclivity in bringing women back from your excursions to other realities."
Tiamat would, presumably, be admin, and there seems to be some (albeit imperfect, as seen in Final Fantasy...) separation between staff and clientele. It may also make Terra-tan jealous, which could be a Bad Thing...
While I expect that a Dungeons and Dragons marilith could do the whole "legs and remote tail" thing if it really wanted to, such traits seem distinct enough that I believe them to indicate that the marilith in question is not entirely sourced from Dungeons and Dragons, and thus would not be bound to Dungeons and Dragons alignment rules. The succubus definitely shouldn't, though I have no idea what, if any, ethical impositions it may possess from its own source...
Unless there is some other effect in play. If D.C. works largely upon D.&D. rules, then it may be that the local elemental makeup is filtering into what are, in some senses, elementals, that may be literally composed of elemental Evil or similar... . I mean, if you are literally composed of Evil, and go to a place with different Evil, then you are probably going to ingest some of the local flavour and become, to a steadily accruing extent, what you eat...
On the one hand, Alchemist is holding back massively here. Which Player One knows (but has no idea by how much) and Wonder Woman does not yet.
There are a great many people who would pay for this service or the reverse. My sister among them."...I mean, I can change all of them to men? I have a spell for that?" He... What?!
She's from the Abyss, not hell. Hell is a different plane from the one mariliths come from.
Superboy/Con-el/Conner Kent is half human, so it might be a result of how he was made.Huh. Is Yuffie inhuman enough that things that infect her from humans can go to aliens like Kryptonians and Martians? That could make her a dangerous infection vector if the opposite is also true.
I was pegging him at true neutral or lawful neutral.Honestly imo that's one of the best changes in 5e, where they have specifically made the delineation between Alignment and Morality. It's not like that delineation hasn't always existed, it just was contradicted at times. Chromatic Dragons are Good but definitely not good, there are "good" devils but no Good devils. etc.
Honestly imo there's a strong argument to be had that Alchemist is Lawful Evil, if he ever came up against spells that care about that. He has very specific rules and doesn't step outside of them to help others. Sure, he's happy to help if people ask and it's not too much an imposition, but that's more Neutral than Good, and he definitely doesn't volunteer: You ask, or he probably isn't gonna offer.