Wait, who was the sucubus?

A generic undead spellcaster mob from White Knight Chronicles. She was the first person he brought back by accident.
While she was trying to kill him.
Being brought to a slightly more real world caused her to blue-screen back when she was introduced, so they had enough time for her to get taken in by Diana before she rebooted and decided to keep trying to kill Hacke- Alchemist.
 
Will all females gunning for Al be of demonic nature, or at least of inherently evil alignment? Now only wait for him to go to D&D to find himself a drider, maybe a red dragoness, or hell, why go for chump change, and not go for Tiamat herself?
 
wait, was M´gan interested in Alchemist? i had forgotten that...

still, good of her to challenge her type disadvantage like that. honestly though she was more or less catatonic in fear from the fire in her room...

edit: Oh, not M´gan, and not a failure to identify the creature typ, but that succubi from way back that i had forgoten about.

yeah, creatures of chaos do like alchemist, as long as they ai'nt a Lord, in wich case they hate him for setting them on fire and stealing their stick...
 
Last edited:
You know someone should really sit Alchemist down and talk to him about this at some point because it's starting to become a habit.
"Why do you keep bringing back women from other worlds?"
 
You should add an AN(Authors Note) to this chapter reminding people who the Succubus is, in the event they have forgotten. It has been a while.

Kinda wonder if Alchemist is going to be monogamous or if he will wind up with more than one woman. I mean, he has several interested in him. The Succubus, Kary, Dinah(maybe, they do kinda have that antagonism going where she might be)... Kinda hopeful that he does end up in some kind of polyamorous relationship. There are several characters that I'd be interested in seeing more of, and that would be entertaining to see them interested in the MC.
Harley, Ivy(maybe she likes how eco-friendly Alchemist is...?), Raven(if she ever winds up being a part of this AU, since she was not in YJ), Diana(if she does not have her heart set on Batman, who already has several ladies on the side), Maybe for a surprise twist have Hippolyta be interested in him...
 
I mean... Deamons love power and Alchemist is really really strong.
It's not just demons if it was then this would be an entirely different conversation. But this has happened four times now first with the succubus, then with the crazy dragonborn, then Yuffie, and now this. Once is simply chance, twice is a coincidence, three times and you have a pattern, FOUR and now your just taking the ¶!$~.
 
Pretty sure that only one is of evil alignment so far and even that's iffy considering how Alchemist 'defeated' her.

Capital E Evil in DND terms doesn't necessitate inflicting pain upon others, just prioritizing yourself and those you personally care about above everyone else.

It's also why Good creatures can be jackasses. They try to do things for "the greater good", but can still have warped views on what that greater good is.
 
D&D alignments are oversimplified so that 12-year-olds can understand them. They are not an accurate moral/ethical measuring device/framework. It'd be like using TableSpoon measurements when doing organic chemistry labs: that's not what they're for.
 
D&D alignments are oversimplified so that 12-year-olds can understand them. They are not an accurate moral/ethical measuring device/framework. It'd be like using TableSpoon measurements when doing organic chemistry labs: that's not what they're for.
Not strictly true. Outside of the dimensions(or clusters there of) of conceptual alignment the third edition DM guide flat out says that its lawful according to the rules of that society. So outlooks of different societies can flat out see each other as chaotic in their own world view. Its just too in depth for casual play and often subjective. Mostly its relevant for certain spells. Good and Evil can be different depending on the motivations. I've heard of a CE party leader of a LG party. The basic motivation behind an act is important. That party had most of its conflicts over loot resolved by the party law of the CE leader, "If you can't work it out civilly the item is mine now." A greed selfish 'law' that worked as its stupid hard not to look like a moron if you the party leader gets all the loot because you can't control yourselves. Also, hillarious for the party leader to bring that metaphorical hammer down.

However alignment is not a two axis grid. Its three dimensional. The social axis of Law versus Chaos. The ethical axis of Good vs Evil. The third is the axis that RP handles. People can play the exact same character completely different. What I like to call the 'Real person' vs '@&%$#' axis. Its why affable evil is mostly accepted and the stereotypical paladin is a pox upon fun. Also why Neutral Good are called martyrs and are a sever hazard to the party of many levels.

On the mystical level there are absolutes of alignment in those universes mortals aren't that bound by them unless the let themselves be. Also mortals can change alignment and those can mess you up as a character, even without being bound to a philosophy. Even using the static alignments a good DM will inform you your risking alignment change. Unless your moving on the third axis and then your just that kind of character.
Jinx wasn't brought from an ID.
Jinx is also in a sister roll. She is more family than anything else here and Yuffie basically adopted him and Jinx like a cat does. Particularly a Dorf Fortress style cat. That is what happens when you try to force raise a Chaotic Good character as lawful Neutral and let her level before age of majority.
 
Be a competent and strong man with emotional maturity around a bunch of superheroines or otherwise powered ladies and you'll end up catching someone's attention! Not surprising that could be someones' if you're around long enough.
 
Back
Top