- Location
- Asia
Maps of Germany's 1937 borders.
Oh, the people living in the Alsace know now, they had tough times in France after ww2. And Mr. de Gaulle is not really a forgiving man, at least now.
Indeed until about 1960 both countries remained enemies. Only the pressure from the superpowers, especially USSR, but to a degree also USA, forced them together. So for example France tried to torpedo the German position in the Saar referendum and Germany supported Algerian freedom fighters (or terrorists, from another point of view). In 1963 the friendship was sealed. That didn't stop Mitterand later to try to torpedo German reunification...
If i remember correctly,some GDR politicans opposed unification,too.And i could undestandt that - it is nice to be bigger toad in small pond, then small one in big pond.
Can someone fill the clueless American (namely, me) in on who this is referring to? Because I have no idea.It's honestly a miracle that a certain old lady didn't get tossed out on her ass when she suggested cooperating with the Soviets/Russians to enforce the permanent division of the German nation.
Can someone fill the clueless American (namely, me) in on who this is referring to? Because I have no idea.
What is DM in this context if not their currency which doesn't make much sense?Mitterand finally relented, also because I think, that he was promised, the Germans would give up the DM (what has been denied by official sources, but the French started their talks that they wanted to talk about the German nukes first. The Germans were perplex, as they said, they had no nukes. The French had nukes. The French said yes, but the Germans had the DM and they were using it every day.). So Thatcher tried to do everything to torpedo the reunification.
When will we bomb the us? I hope operation ...will be an atomic bomb because it will be the only thing keeping roosevelt definitly down.
But the problem with that is, by the late 1980s, the GDR was broke.
Yes the GDR needed cash. This means liquidity, to pay for it's imports because the states of the east stopped the repayments of their loans.
So yes, they needed tho loan to survive. But this doesn't disprove my point and neither does your article.
And the East-Mark was real money! It just wasn't an accepted affluent currency in the west.
Are the German aware of what roseveltThe Soviets made peace and are delivering resources. Roosevelt is still playing Cato the Elder: Ceterum censeo Germaniam esse delendam.
Are the German aware of what rosevelt
playing and what's going on with rest of USA allies specially the British, Commonwealth,France and Italy also what do you mean Cato the elder?
Vichy France is the best choiceThe Morgenthau Plan is very much known to the Germans. For the uptime Germans, facing the prospect of what was once an academic possibility turning into horrifying reality is rather...shocking. For the downtime Germans, as per OTL, it stiffens resistance against the West. Also, together with the bombings of Munster and Berlin, it drove home for non-ethnic German Germans the hollowness of American hegemony (probably stained from OTL thanks to the Iraq War as the latest in a long list of American BS in the 20th Century aimed at ensuring American economic and military supremacy at the expense of local democratic institutions in Third World Countries) that in hindsight should have been obvious ever since the Banana Wars of the 19th century.
Britain and the Commonwealth wants peace. France...which one? Italy...wondering if they should change sides again.
Cato Sicarius had a habit of ending all his speeches with "Carthage (modern day Tunis) must be destroyed", even if the speech had nothing to with Carthage in the first place.
While Vichy is the better choice, the Germans had already recognized de Gaulle. That this was too fast, I agree. But i don't want to make Germany making no errors. Italy, which had changed the sides TWICE at the expense of Germany, would want to, but such a turn would need time- and trust. Currently the Germans don't trust the Italians.
It is great that mistakes of both sides are added in and recognising DeGaulle quickly based on stuff from the 50/60s is definitely one, but that might change. I agree with JaeneraTargaryen that if DeGaulle sticks with the Wallies no matter what, he will be sidelined. Berlin, esp. it´s DT-foreign politicians will push for working with Vichy first. DeGaulle might already have hesitated too long in opening full negotiations. I can see a situation where DeGaulle becomes Presidant of France, but that most of the nation will be ruled by Vichy officials.Elsass-Lothringen and Eupen-Malmedy are so going to be major sticking points when it's time to start talking with De Gaulle -_-
Then again, recognition can always be withdrawn, say...for instance, he goes the way of the Poles, i.e. he decides to stick with FDR and fight to the last man, woman, and child, to obliterate the German nation and wipe the German race off the face of the planet.