- Location
- Asia
So a bunch of soldiers went vigilante on the SS men running the death camps.
...
...
...
What's the problem?
...
...
...
What's the problem?
So how likely is war to come to South America? Specifically, Allied countries escalating and finally attacking those countries aligned with Germany and the new UN, with the backing of a US operating under the Munroe doctrine?
Speaking of tanks with no turret, here's something from this thread's AH origin, something cooked up in conversation between myself and Cortz#9. Something that Japan could use against the USA, but not requiring much of their limited industrial capacity.
Take the Chi-Ha, remove its turret, and mount a Type-90 75 mm Field Gun, and weld an angled plate to the front of the chassis. Essentially a way to soup-up the Chi-Ha and make it more effective against superior Allied armor, it would be quite economical given the large number of existing Chi-Ha tanks. Not to mention it's not really needed in very large numbers, given the fighting in the Pacific Theater is island-based, with tanks largely meant for support purposes. This modification of the Chi-Ha would play merry hell for those support elements, and would be useful too in a direct-fire role.
It might be useful too against the T-34, though given how things will eventually develop, this is redundant.
(1) Given your suggestions you will end up with the Type 1 Ho-Ni tank destroyer. One modification I could suggest is to transform the gun shield into a turret (with limited traverse 10 deg left/right) which is effectively the Type 3 Ho-Ni III tank destroyer.
As a note, every single one of those is worthless, good only for scrap material. You don't have the arming codes. Those are never shared in peacetime. So unless the Americans are still on the base and you can convince them to give them to you, you've can employ the b-61. And considering you probably intend to threaten the DT US with them, well, they're not very likely to cough up the codes.
So use the Ho-Ni for tank destroyer duties (Chi-Ha is plentiful) with the Chi-Nu forming the core of the Japanese offensive tanks. Simple and standardised, good ideas Jaenera.The Ho-Ni has a turret though. What we came up with is essentially a Japanese Hetzer.
With regard to a proper medium tank, the Chi-Nu would suffice. As previously-mentioned, Japan has limited industry. Best to concentrate resources on a few, good, all-around models than spread it around. And it's not like tanks are as important in the Pacific as they are in Europe and North Africa.
8,8cm Kwk 42 in a Panther turret doesn't work. The larger breech and stronger recoil impulse is going to slam the breech into the backside of the turret. And a Jagdpanzer IV with that gun would be a nightmare to operate, too.
I suspect there would be a third big group too: Those who basically say "I disagree with many of the policies of the uptimers - but it obviously works. I can live with it. The British fleet can't, but their loss, yes?" Most knew that Germany was loosing the war, even if none would dare say it aloud in 1944. And as long as the end result points towards an obviously strong and free Germany...And while the left radical resistance died down shortly after as many were either too shocked or acted too soon for a real campaign, the Nazis were hiding for the time being. As far as Peggy was aware, the Nazis were split into two groups: One group thinking that for now war had to be won and afterwards they would then proceed getting power by popular vote when the population saw that theirs was the way to go in these uncertain times. Then there was the second group unable to even form a more coherent strategy than simply burning down offices of the Left or ganging up on foreigners in groups.
Yeah an 88mm L/71 is definitely not going to fit in a Panther (flat face) turret but can potentially fit inside the schmalturm turret that was designed for the Panther II.
Slightly off-topic, do you think development of an APDS or APFSDS round (sorry I am obsessed with APDS/APFSDS ) for the 75mm KwK 42 will negate the need for fitting the 88mm KwK 43 into the Panther upgrade? Even a steel penetrating rod should (imo) prove to be as deadly as the 88mm KwK 43's round at the least.
The 8.8cm Schmalturm proposal by Krupp was actually drafted up a lot later than the Panther II*, and was a significant change to the earlier Schmalturm designs with the 7.5cm guns. The whole turret was somewhat enlarged, and required some significant changes to the hull to widen the turret ring by another 10cm. It would not have fit on the existing Panther hull.
*Panther II development was dropped in late 43, the 8.8cm Schmalturm proposal for the Panther F was only floated in late '44.
Eh, considering what he'll be hearing about German wonder weapons, I wouldn't be surprised to see MacArthur decide to not do that - if nothing else, because it could sound bad to the press/politicians, which would be awkward for MacArthur's image.Much like at AH, I'm looking forward to MacArthur being MacArthur to Patton and Ike over being defeated at Boulogne. Ike would probably just let it slide, but Patton is likely going to punch MacArthur in the face.