What turret? That's casemate-mounted gun from what I can tell.Lol. The Kjp-IV looks so derpy, I love it. Can it even turn that huge turret?
What turret? That's casemate-mounted gun from what I can tell.Lol. The Kjp-IV looks so derpy, I love it. Can it even turn that huge turret?
What turret? That's casemate-mounted gun from what I can tell.
As a note, every single one of those is worthless, good only for scrap material. You don't have the arming codes. Those are never shared in peacetime. So unless the Americans are still on the base and you can convince them to give them to you, you've can employ the b-61. And considering you probably intend to threaten the DT US with them, well, they're not very likely to cough up the codes.There are 20 B61 nuclear bombs (thermonuclear, 1kt - 400kt yield) stored at Büchel Air Base.
Edit no.1: Germany is a nuclear latent state. This means it can quickly build nuclear weapons as the relevant expertise, materials and industrial capability is available.
With more than a year to work with, removing those detonators and installing new ones for a couple should be very doable. Might eliminate the 'variable yield' part, but whatever. If it takes more than a year to do that? Probably easier to make new bombs from scratch. Maybe not as fancy, but fancy isn't actually needed.As a note, every single one of those is worthless, good only for scrap material. You don't have the arming codes. Those are never shared in peacetime. So unless the Americans are still on the base and you can convince them to give them to you, you've can employ the b-61. And considering you probably intend to threaten the DT US with them, well, they're not very likely to cough up the codes.
That's why I said they're good for scrap. You can reclaim the nuclear material.With more than a year to work with, removing those detonators and installing new ones for a couple should be very doable. Might eliminate the 'variable yield' part, but whatever. If it takes more than a year to do that? Probably easier to make new bombs from scratch. Maybe not as fancy, but fancy isn't actually needed.
That's why I said they're good for scrap. You can reclaim the nuclear material.
The big problem is that most of the methods you'd use for that risk bricking the detonators, at which point the bomb safes itself permanently, which means you now have a 320 kilo potentially radioactive paperweight.Am I the only one that finds it highly unlikeley, that Germany doesn't have the ability to circumvent, crack, or disable the codes for the nuclear bombs?
I don't think there wouldn't be measures in place to take controll of these weapons in an emergency.
um, in a sudden emergency where the us has no advance notice and isn't reachable the desired state is that no one can use the weapons. Which is how the US set things up.Am I the only one that finds it highly unlikeley, that Germany doesn't have the ability to circumvent, crack, or disable the codes for the nuclear bombs?
I don't think there wouldn't be measures in place to take controll of these weapons in an emergency.
Of course you are right, that that is how the US set it up.um, in a sudden emergency where the us has no advance notice and isn't reachable the desired state is that no one can use the weapons. Which is how the US set things up.
considering the weapons are stored under the constant guard of the american airforce it doesn't matter what people in germany want?Of course you are right, that that is how the US set it up.
What I'm saying is that I find it unlikely, in all those years the bombs have been stationed in Germany someone along the way wouldn't want to ensure that Germany could take control of the weapons should the US be unable to share the codes.
Merkels phone was also constantly in her possession and the NSA still got into it, so...considering the weapons are stored under the constant guard of the american airforce it doesn't matter what people in germany want?
yes, because phones have lots of vulnerabilities ... actually im not really going to go through the effort of putting out just how different nuclear weapons are from cell phonesMerkels phone was also constantly in her possession and the NSA still got into it, so...
Of course. But you don't need to have access to the weapons to get information about them. As with Merkels phone, the NSA didn't need that access in order to crack it.yes, because phones have lots of vulnerabilities ... actually im not really going to go through the effort of putting out just how different nuclear weapons are from cell phones
yes, u do? i mean unless you are talking stealing us models and blueprints u definitely do.Of course. But you don't need to have access to the weapons to get information about them. As with Merkels phone, the NSA didn't need that access in order to crack it.
Sure it might take a few days or weeks to do it, but certainly not months or a year.
I am.i mean unless you are talking stealing us models and blueprints u definitely do.
As a note, every single one of those is worthless, good only for scrap material. You don't have the arming codes. Those are never shared in peacetime. So unless the Americans are still on the base and you can convince them to give them to you, you've can employ the b-61. And considering you probably intend to threaten the DT US with them, well, they're not very likely to cough up the codes.
1. No, the US didn't and doesn't want people to just be able to choose to use nuclear weapons. In the event of an actual war, they might give the codes to military of the nation in which the bombs are being based, might. And you could write that, but that would be completely implausible. The Donbass war never was even remotely considered to be the prelude to an invasion of western Europe. Like that's just really dumb.(1) The Germans should have access (in one form or the other) to the nuclear codes which makes sense in the case the USA is unable to transmit codes e.g. nuclear alpha strike causes severe damage to CONUS preventing transmittal of nuclear codes.
It can be easily written in that nuclear codes were given to Germany due to threat of the Donbass war (it was at its peak in 2014/15) spilling over into a Ukrainian-Russian war and eventually a NATO (Europeans mainly) Russian war.
(2) Don't you think the Germans would have the technical skills and capabilities to get through the PAL system and install detonators of their own?
(3) Most foreign personnel (unless they are related in some way to Germany e.g. marriage, ancestry etc.) are not included in the ISOT so there will be no coughing up of codes involved unless some US personnel at Buchel airbase have German ancestry.
Yes trying to break through the security on the bombs has the risk of rendering them permanently unusable but removing the radioactive material to build a new bomb will take as much time as Germany would using its own uranium sources. It would be a good idea to take a two pronged approach, that is try to crack the B61s' security and building new bombs from scratch.
Moreover the DT USA (FDR especially) just needs to be shown the effects of a nuclear detonation in the form of documentaries and footage of nuclear tests which should prove to be informative so to speak. Also, unless this information was included in the Kaßmann leak DT USA would not know that a nuclear code system for the bombs exist so it can't relax if Merkel issues a "nuclear flavoured" threat.
The PAL system is first of all, only one of the security measures that prevent unathorized arming of the devices. Moreover, the current PAL codes are 12 digits in length, not 9.