We've got this well deserved half-barbaroi reputation, because voters just don't have the strong Hellenic supremacy beliefs that the NPCs do and have acted accordingly. Even goes back to the initial "free the slaves and enfranchise them" choice at the beginning, as our citizen base became a lot more multicultural and diverse than is expected in Ancient Greece. We're an oddity, and we continually affirm those suspicions with all our barbaroi befriending.

itym ERETRIA KOSMOPOLIS
 
Honestly I'm also pretty happy with the current plan, just as I was happy with Steel Ram.

They're both consistent. Basically everything they're doing flows into the other things they're trying to do, in terms of diplomacy and straegy. Well, maybe Plan Lasting Victory doesn't exactly need to do the land grants, but whatever.


definitely don't google what "Arktos" means in Ancient Greek, or the etymology of "Arkadia"
 
The ekklesia three quests down the line (h/t Xenophon Zolotas):

Article:
Kyrie, I eulogize the archons of the Panethnic Numismatic Thesaurus and the Ecumenical Trapeza for the orthodoxy of their axioms, methods and policies, although there is an episode of cacophony of the Trapeza with Hellas. With enthusiasm we dialogue and synagonize at the synods of our didymous organizations in which polymorphous economic ideas and dogmas are analyzed and synthesized. Our critical problems such as the numismatic plethora generate some agony and melancholy. This phenomenon is characteristic of our epoch. But, to my thesis, we have the dynamism to program therapeutic practices as a prophylaxis from chaos and catastrophe. In parallel, a Panethnic unhypocritical economic synergy and harmonization in a democratic climate is basic. I apologize for my eccentric monologue. I emphasize my euharistia to you, Kyrie to the eugenic and generous American Ethnos and to the organizers and protagonists of his Amphictyony and the gastronomic symposia.

Article:
Kyrie, it is Zeus' anathema on our epoch for the dynamism of our economies and the heresy of our economic methods and policies that we should agonize the Scylla of numismatic plethora and the Charybdis of economic anaemia. It is not my idiosyncrasy to be ironic or sarcastic, but my diagnosis would be that politicians are rather cryptoplethorists. Although they emphatically stigmatize numismatic plethora, they energize it through their tactics and practices. Our policies have to be based more on economic and less on political criteria. Our gnomon has to be a metron between political, strategic and philanthropic scopes. Political magic has always been anti-economic. In an epoch characterized by monopolies, oligopolies, monopsonies, monopolistic antagonism and polymorphous inelasticities, our policies have to be more orthological. But this should not be metamorphosed into plethorophobia, which is endemic among academic economists. Numismatic symmetry should not hyper-antagonize economic acme. A greater harmonization between the practices of the economic and numismatic archons is basic. Parallel to this, we have to synchronize and harmonize more and more our economic and numismatic policies panethnically. These scopes are more practicable now, when the prognostics of the political and economic barometer are halcyonic. The history of our didymus organizations in this sphere has been didactic and their gnostic practices will always be a tonic to the polyonymous and idiomorphous ethnical economies. The genesis of the programmed organization will dynamize these policies. Therefore, I sympathize, although not without criticism on one or two themes, with the apostles and the hierarchy of our organs in their zeal to program orthodox economic and numismatic policies, although I have some logomachy with them. I apologize for having tyrannized you with my Hellenic phraseology. In my epilogue, I emphasize my eulogy to the philoxenous autochthons of this cosmopolitan metropolis and my encomium to you, Kyrie, and the stenographers.
 
Oh nonsense.

Stop strawmanning.
Oh really?
Fair enough, but given the extremely hard to replace nature of our manpower and the fact that a single serious loss could set us back decades I'm hesitant to risk a field battle where we don't have a serious advantage unless we have no other choice.

To bet everything on one titanic clash is supreme folly. In defeat we would be ruined, with both the Dauni at our rear and Taras at the fore

Unless, of course, the current war runs on for more than a year, and/or involves us taking heavy losses while our enemies are still capable of taking the field.

I still think we should send our diplomat to Metapontion, but pitched battle is a big no no. Even if we win, the cost in casualties will be too painful.

[X] Plan The Greatest Glory Is Lasting Victory

The "destruction" is less a matter of Tarentine intent and more a matter of what will happen if we lose or draw during a premature pitched battle against an enemy with superior numbers and greater experience, given that the greater part of our manpower will lie dead on the field.

Everyone? We were just warned that taking heavy casualties in battle can irreversibly cripple a polis. This is not a good time to go voting for the plan that rolls the dice on a single big armored clash, with minimal effort to call upon our allies. We're not Sparta; we don't just automatically have superior strength in our phalanx that will roll over the opposition in a direct battle, if we don't take the time and effort to whittle down their own strength first.
Seems to be the reasoning for several people, including you.
 
We've got this well deserved half-barbaroi reputation, because voters just don't have the strong Hellenic supremacy beliefs that the NPCs do and have acted accordingly. Even goes back to the initial "free the slaves and enfranchise them" choice at the beginning, as our citizen base became a lot more multicultural and diverse than is expected in Ancient Greece. We're an oddity, and we continually affirm those suspicions with all our barbaroi befriending.

"When Eretrians come speaking of friendship, put your hands to your weapons"
 
That does make me think about the Dauni though. If it works out with them and the Messappi, we are going to have a massive coastline to watch over and pirates still going about, that will not be fun...

@Cetashwayo where are we on roads? Is that something we can start building to better connect ourselves with our league and barbaroi? I know the Romans were involved in that, but do not know if people did that before them or not
 
[X] Plan The greatest glory is lasting victory
Adhoc vote count started by Japanime on May 26, 2019 at 11:28 PM, finished with 1383 posts and 60 votes.

  • [X] Plan The Greatest Glory Is Lasting Victory
    -[X] [Diplomacy] The Dauni. We cannot allow the Dauni to create a two-front war. Our spies have revealed opposition to a war with Eretria among the Herdonians and Salapians. We must bribe and convince them to push the rest of the Dauni Confederacy into opposing a war with Eretria even it looks momentarily advantageous [-20 talents for bribes, Mnemnon will attempt to convince the Dauni to stay at peace].
    -[X] [Land] Distribute the public lands [-10 Talents start-up cost for hoplites, permanently lose 9 talents per turn in public revenue, +351 Hoplites, Hoplite Ratio to 45%].
    -[X] [League] Accept the Pylonos' Reform Proposal [New League Strategos elected by the cities, power to preside over annual meetings, new League Games every four years, common weights and measures, veto reformed to super-majority of delegates from cities].
    -[X] [Strategos] Epiktetos Linos (Demos Drakonia, The Serpent's Vice)
    [X] Plan Steel Ram
    -[X] [Diplomacy] Metapontion. The Metapontines are cordial with Eretria but have no love for the idea of us being victorious in war with Taras. We must move to keep them neutral, and if possible, to allow Thuriian infantry through their lands to assist us against Taras [-20 talents for bribes, Mnemnon will attempt to negotiate with Metapontion].
    -[X] [Land] Distribute the public lands [-10 Talents start-up cost for hoplites, permanently lose 9 talents per turn in public revenue, +351 Hoplites, Hoplite Ratio to 45%].
    -[X] [League] Accept the Pylonos' Reform Proposal [New League Strategos elected by the cities, power to preside over annual meetings, new League Games every four years, common weights and measures, veto reformed to super-majority of delegates from cities].
    -[X] [Strategos] Theron Zosimos (Demos Antipatria, The Storm of Iron)
    --[X] Glory 6, Lawfulness 3, Friendliness 1, Courage 8, Magnificence 2, Wisdom 5
    [X] [League] Accept the Pylonos' Reform Proposal [New League Strategos elected by the cities, power to preside over annual meetings, new League Games every four years, common weights and measures, veto reformed to super-majority of delegates from cities].
    [X] [Land] Distribute the public lands [-10 Talents start-up cost for hoplites, permanently lose 9 talents per turn in public revenue, +351 Hoplites, Hoplite Ratio to 45%].
    [X] [Strategos] Theron Zosimos (Demos Antipatria, The Storm of Iron)
    -[X] Glory 6, Lawfulness 3, Friendliness 1, Courage 8, Magnificence 2, Wisdom 5
    [x] [Diplomacy] Metapontion.The Metapontines are cordial with Eretria but have no love for the idea of us being victorious in war with Taras. We must move to keep them neutral, and if possible, to allow Thuriian infantry through their lands to assist us against Taras [-20 talents for bribes, Mnemnon will attempt to negotiate with Metapontion].
    [X] Carry A Big Stick (With A Snake Wrapped Round It)
    [X] [Diplomacy] The Dauni. We cannot allow the Dauni to create a two-front war. Our spies have revealed opposition to a war with Eretria among the Herdonians and Salapians. We must bribe and convince them to push the rest of the Dauni Confederacy into opposing a war with Eretria even it looks momentarily advantageous [-20 talents for bribes, Mnemnon will attempt to convince the Dauni to stay at peace].
    [X] [Land] We cannot afford to lose so much revenue [Maintain Hoplite Ratio at 40%, lose no public revenue].
    [X] [Strategos] Epiktetos Linos (Demos Drakonia, The Serpent's Vice)
    [X] [Strategos] Xanthos Irenaeos (Demos Exoria, The Storm of Iron)
    [X] Plan: Iron and Fire
    [X] Plan Eretria Unyielding
    -[X] [Diplomacy] Metapontion. The Metapontines are cordial with Eretria but have no love for the idea of us being victorious in war with Taras. We must move to keep them neutral, and if possible, to allow Thuriian infantry through their lands to assist us against Taras [-20 talents for bribes, Mnemnon will attempt to negotiate with Metapontion].
    -[X] [Land] Distribute the public lands [-10 Talents start-up cost for hoplites, permanently lose 9 talents per turn in public revenue, +351 Hoplites, Hoplite Ratio to 45%].
    -[X] [League] Accept the Pylonos' Reform Proposal [New League Strategos elected by the cities, power to preside over annual meetings, new League Games every four years, common weights and measures, veto reformed to super-majority of delegates from cities].
    -[X] [Strategos] Epiktetos Linos (Demos Drakonia, The Serpent's Vice)
    [X] Plan Steel Ram
    -[X] [Diplomacy] Metapontion. The Metapontines are cordial with Eretria but have no love for the idea of us being victorious in war with Taras. We must move to keep them neutral, and if possible, to allow Thuriian infantry through their lands to assist us against Taras [-20 talents for bribes, Mnemnon will attempt to negotiate with Metapontion].
 
That does make me think about the Dauni though. If it works out with them and the Messappi, we are going to have a massive coastline to watch over and pirates still going about, that will not be fun...

@Cetashwayo where are we on roads? Is that something we can start building to better connect ourselves with our league and barbaroi? I know the Romans were involved in that, but do not know if people did that before them or not

Roads aren't worth it until we really want to go inland.

Here is a link to ORBIS (and the paper) -- Stanford built a geospatial model to represent transport costs during Roman times. Some guy here used it to compute a ratio of sea to river to road costs; to move 1 unit of cargo 1 unit of distance, the ratio between sea/downriver/upriver/road is 1:5:10:52.

That is to say, if it costs 1 talent to move 1 container of grain 1 kilometer by sea, it would cost 52 talents to move that same container by land.

Much, much more efficient to build out our thalassocracy before trying to go inland. :p

EDIT: or what Cetash said
 
So in the case where we choose to pursue Epiktetos' Serpent Plan, who is going to have the...interesting? Interesting job of explaining to our league allies, 300 hoplites eager to prove their polis worthy of their newfound rights in the Epulian League, our plan of the extended skirmish? As Eretrians, we are of course familiar with using our famed cavalry, but it might be a...novel experience for our league allies.
 
So in the case where we choose to pursue Epiktetos' Serpent Plan, who is going to have the...interesting? Interesting job of explaining to our league allies, 300 hoplites eager to prove their polis worthy of their newfound rights in the Epulian League, our plan of the extended skirmish? As Eretrians, we are of course familiar with using our famed cavalry, but it might be a...novel experience for our league allies.

Their neophytes may grumble, it is true. The veterans, who have seen war, and know that Eretria does not spend the lives of its allies freely, but is as dear with theirs as we are with our own? That has merits, also.
 
Oh really?

Seems to be the reasoning for several people, including you.
There's a reason I used the word "premature", you know.

I feel like the odds aren't enough in our favor right now for a pitched battle, but a significant part of that is that the Tarentines are more experienced and don't need to bring a significant portion of their heavy infantry from the other side of Italy, plus not needing to turn an assemblage of forces from a wide array of cities into a cohesive whole. Give us enough time to blood our troops and get our own troops, the League forces, and possibly the Thurii used to working together, and then I'd be more sanguine about our chances in open battle against the Tarentine hoplites.
 
Man. This is a muck of a situation, which isn't really anything new in this quest.

So my issue with the Storm of Iron strategy is that mixes poorly with the diplo options. Obviously getting the 2000 hoplites out of Thurii is key to its success. Beating Taras on the field and all that, but I don't think we can get them. Sending Mnemnon to Metapontion isn't a guarantee of success. It's just a chance at one, and I don't think he'll succeed.

We've got this well deserved half-barbaroi reputation, because voters just don't have the strong Hellenic supremacy beliefs that the NPCs do and have acted accordingly. Even goes back to the initial "free the slaves and enfranchise them" choice at the beginning, as our citizen base became a lot more multicultural and diverse than is expected in Ancient Greece. We're an oddity, and we continually affirm those suspicions with all our barbaroi befriending. And so they want to meet with the xenoparakletor, which is a lose-lose situation. If we say no and send him to the Dauni, we're just reinforcing this bad reputation. If we send him, well...

Cetashwayo mentioned last turn that negotiating a deal with the Metapontines is not Mnemnon's strong suit. We elected a xenoparakletor to deal with barbaroi, and he did a good job of it. Earned himself a permanent position as liason to the Peuketii were that an actual thing. But now we're asking him to go talk to some Greeks and he's no a model austere Hellene. Glory 2 means he probably won't make a great impression. The Storm of Iron strategy also makes his job a bit harder, because we're going for a more decisive victory which they are nervous about. We are going about it in a very Hellenistic fashion, but all the same, not giving them what they want. And a poor salesman at that.

There's also the matter of opportunity cost, where what happens when we don't make promises to the Dauni? Well, Storm of Iron takes a lot more of our manpower away to fend them off at first, but Serpent's Vice keeps more of them locked up in siege. And again, this assumes that the mission to the Dauni is successful and our xenoparakletor is not completely swindled and outwitted by the apparent intrigue-hero king of the Dauni. I do fear the message that sends, where we decline the Metapontine's request and instead grant that of a barbaroi. Which we then have to weigh against sending a poor representative.

So yeah, losing out on the right of passage is a blow to success chances on that one. A shame, because I think Storm of Iron's very workable with Thurii's support, but so be it.

What do you think of Mnemnon's Friendliness and Courage saving negotiations from failure on Thurii? I would think him being too trusting might unintentionally work out in our favor when the ills of the league and Eretria are sniffed out.

I mean there's already a sentiment in Metapontion that we're haughty enough that we've just ensured our destruction, but I don't think they'll still be laughing when the reality of us needing Thurii hits home.
 
Their neophytes may grumble, it is true. The veterans, who have seen war, and know that Eretria does not spend the lives of its allies freely, but is as dear with theirs as we are with our own? That has merits, also.

It not so much the fact that we might choose to preserve men, but the way we go about it that would provide the culture shock I am concerned about. Our foes already view us as half barbaroi, I do would not like our allies to think the same.
 
[] Plan Steel Ram

Why do people bring rocks to the assembly? And vote by lifting them?
It's an Eretrian thing.

No citizen is allowed to address the Assembly in public unless they do so from atop a rock. If you plan to actually participate in public speaking and political discussion in the Assembly on any level beyond that of private conversation, you bring a rock. Rocks aren't required to vote, but are required to be accepted as a fully participatory citizen.

Bigger rocks are more prestigious, so successful politicians tend to have very big rocks- too large for one person to carry, but that's fine since they have supporters to carry them.

In general, no serious policy proposal will be listened to unless the proponent has a big rock, such as might be carried by several kleftes, or lifters. This is an IC way of justifying the OOC mechanic whereby several players have to second any given user motion for it to be put to a vote.
 
Last edited:
[X] Plan Steel Ram

Why do people bring rocks to the assembly? And vote by lifting them?
It started when Drakos and Antipater got in an argument. Drako got on a rock to shout gooder* and then Antipater got on one to shout back. So then Drako got a better rock, and there it went.

Then I believe it was @Cetashwayo that introduced kleftes(rock-lifter) to connect it to having 3 people support a user-motion before it was votes on by the rest of us to pass or veto. Then it became literal.

That is it. That is why we do it.

*I give it the respect it demands :V
 
Is creating a...highway of some kind to connect Eretria and her allies to each other a megaproject of some sort?

Also, apparently non-Hellenes also create timber tracked roads? And Hellenes crushed stone ones? How much would each option cost?
Probably but money and political will are factors. Like our city is shit so the people want that fixed first
 
Is creating a...highway of some kind to connect Eretria and her allies to each other a megaproject of some sort?

Also, apparently non-Hellenes also create timber tracked roads? And Hellenes crushed stone ones? How much would each option cost?
We're a coastal polity - ships are vastly more efficient than even the best roads.

One advantage of Serpent's Vice that hasn't been raised is that it should permit the blooding of our younger citizens in a more controlled fashion before a major clash, rather than hurling them into a mass battle straight off. That should hopefully lead to a few more of them surviving than otherwise.
 
Back
Top