OTOH it's a dandy place to get ideas for destroyer shenanigans.
Your logic seems sound to me.OTOH it's a dandy place to get ideas for destroyer shenanigans.
No wonder Sky does so damn well writing how Destroyers think & act....
He's like Steve Irwin and is observing them in their natural environment.
-=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=-
After thinking on it for a day, and damn glad nobody's posted here yet.....Please, for my sanity & Sky's sanity, not to mentioning avoiding mod wrath, for the love of god - nobody write an omake of Sky doing what I just said above, with or without the Aussie accent. Would be creepy as hell.
The propeller on the planes go 'round and 'round, 'round and 'round.
Indeed. She posed for the photo, and was a rather good sport about the entire thing.
Lolwut?
True dat, and the model is completely assembled. No inner parts are visible.
What's the significance to the story? The Essexes aren't coming for another year or two in-universe.You know, I've actually found a rather interesting image that I think you all will like:
The closest carrier is USS Saratoga, next to her is USS Enterprise, next to them is an Essex class Fleet Carrier, and next to her is I think an Independence class Light Carrier. Still look at the size difference between the four of them.
It has Sara in it.
If that was relevant, I would be spamming images of CV-60.
If that was relevant, I would be spamming images of CV-60.
But I'm not an admin, what do I know.
I actually like it because it is firstly a great photo, and secondly gives a very good idea of relative sizes and dispositions of carriers. I hadn't realized that the Enterprise was the smallest of the three fleet carriers till now.
@Darth Thanatos no hentai!Not enough lewds, though.
<goes off to look for more dry dock pics>