I'm pretty sure Sandra understood. She just said it was about being the Vanguard, let Setsuna keep face.Surprised Sandra misunderstood Setsuna she's usually better than that.
I'm pretty sure Sandra understood. She just said it was about being the Vanguard, let Setsuna keep face.Surprised Sandra misunderstood Setsuna she's usually better than that.
I'm sure I can handle these rolling things. They're bad for my heart. I'm happily reading the update then suddenly "FAILURE" and I'm put off on reading further.
But when is it not? It's the biggest risk to our flight mates, aside from Shuri none of them even KNOW how nasty Type Zeros get.
Whoops, SV auto tagged "@Anna", when I posted.
Hope there isn't an acutal user named Anna getting spammed.
EDIT: Oh god there is. Sorry.
EDIT:And I did it again pffffft.
As long as we don't go berserk, but what is gonna happen if oogles of civilians & flightmates die?It still feels fake to us as long as we don't go berserk.
And more importantly, we want to know how well our flight mates handle a Type Zero.
Rather important to their training isn't it?
But when is it not? It's the biggest risk to our flight mates, aside from Shuri none of them even KNOW how nasty Type Zeros get.
A Type Zero scenario sim would be good for getting Kojirou to actually have solid sights on a goal rather than "try to beat Anna at her own game"
Apparently Anna only gets her buttons pushed when she sees a 'real' opponent threaten a friend.As long as we don't go berserk, but what is gonna happen if oogles of civilians & flightmates die?
I am not certain that it would happen, but I do expect a roll for it.
(I am genuinely curios why no vote wants to go in space)
Because going all out from the start may result in Anna getting 'in the zone' or at least make her treat the 'deaths' of her teammates more seriously than she should.Wait, why the hell is everyone voting Hold Back?
This will probably be our Squad for a very long time- if something shitty happens, we need to be able to work together at our very best because otherwise it would totally screw with squad cohesion.
Which, if I have to spell it out for you, is bad.
Very bad.
Man, I'd feel pretty weirded if I logged into a forum after a couple of months absence and had a couple of dozen tags in a quest I've never heard of.Bad news is there is a user named anna.
Good news is the last time she logged on was in November 2014
I actually want her to break down, fry the simulator so bad that the hardware has to be replaced and put every one in the hospital for a week. That would be a fun scene to read.Because going all out from the start may result in Anna getting 'in the zone' or at least make her treat the 'deaths' of her teammates more seriously than she should.
Reading that particular bit, it looks like it's the attitude that's the problem, since when you look at the actual sim experience, she only reacted negatively when one of them had a targeting solution that included 'real' friendlies.Because going all out from the start may result in Anna getting 'in the zone' or at least make her treat the 'deaths' of her teammates more seriously than she should.
@veekie, she treated one of her teammates saying that the virtual civilians didn't matter as an enemy who should die for a second in a previous sim, so Anna may get more emotionally invested in the sim as it goes along.
Sandra×Anna, s.s. beauty and the beast? Enkidu's chains? What's a good name for this?
It's the set of Moderate scenarios. Those are the events leading up to the "unexpected closure of the Saksatoon Breach"Anyway, reading and typing on a phone is hard. Where's the Alaskan scenario? Pit them against what Anna went through. See if they survive. If they do, we can maybe start relying on them.if not ...
S.S. Anna
Shuri x Sandra X Anna
It's the set of Moderate scenarios. Those are the events leading up to the "unexpected closure of the Saksatoon Breach"