It's At the Target not Target met.
It's At the Target not Target met.
ALL PLAN GOALS MET.The targets are:
150% Increases in MFPG: Target Met
150% Increases in Capital Goods: Target Met
150% Increases in Consumer Goods: Target Met
50% increase in food production: Target Met
Military Production Targets
Size Increase to 1 Million Personel: At the target
Construction of Stage 5 Academies: Target Met
When the prison labor gangs and their Engineering Commissars both agree that the new guys can't work.Though, the new political guys sent in were absolute idiots, incapable of even building a wall to stand independently.
-Efrosin Novikov, Journal
All of the new political guys could be considered to be untrained, incompetent idiots incapable of so much as cutting plants. I would recommend mass remedial classes in construction and understanding what they are doing. Otherwise, the bulk of the idiots can best be used as transportation labor for other far more useful workers.
-Georgiy Popov, Engineering Commissariat
Under Communism there shall be no Hunger! Also, this just in collapse in farming communities over prices! Party working on the Matter.Huh, we have a surplus of food. I suppose we avoided the starvation problem of otl.
No need Comrade. Notice how we almost eliminated the Peasant occupation but increased food supply? Now those former Peasants can turned into productive workers...Under Communism there shall be no Hunger! Also, this just in collapse in farming communities over prices! Party working on the Matter.
It's almost like we don't need to use the heavy handed approach every time to get good results.We did so almost accidentally, picking the least severe option when poking peasants away from their fields, price cuts. And then mostly ignoring farm actions for a while. When we had recently sold off our grain surplis.
Then we got a scare but no actual famine, and dumped tons of dice into the voluntary cooperatives and caught up.
We seem to have avoided a lot of OTL problems by just being chill and providing people with the means to handle stuff at the lower levels. Sergo and Anastas' secret? DelegationHuh, we have a surplus of food. I suppose we avoided the starvation problem of otl.
Brezhnev won't rise far in the Party without Khrushchev there to back him.If we want to keep the Union from falling we can start by arranging an unfortunate accident for Brezhnev.
Still, I think it may be worth our while to arrange for him to suffocate on his eyebrows in his sleep.Brezhnev won't rise far in the Party without Khrushchev there to back him.
The guy hasn't done anything though, he's just a low ranking officer right now. What's he done to warrant Mikoyan's attention? Besides with the amount of accurate & precise reporting culture we're creating the level of corruption in the Soviet Union won't go nearly as high.Still, I think it may be worth our while to arrange for him to suffocate on his eyebrows in his sleep.
It was an accident, honest! You shouldn't let caterpillars live on your face like that.
Brezhnev wakes up one beautiful morning, brushes his teeth, finishes his breakfast, puts on his suit and polishes off his medals.
As he's about to leave his apartment, he stops to look in the mirror and glues his eyebrows back on his upper lip.
"I suppose that's enough jokes for now."
We just finished the 2nd FYP. Next turn is overview of the 2nd FYP and setting new targets.So we've met our obligations or are close enough. I suppose we spend our remaining time and resources addressing our economic issues to build a buffer for the next steps.
Also, would it be possible to set up a recycling initiative and/or rationing board to reduce consumption of resources?
Wow, we really cut it close didn't we?We just finished the 2nd FYP. Next turn is overview of the 2nd FYP and setting new targets.
Completing the plan in full at all was impossible according to the economists. That we managed it without any book-cooking is amazing in and of itself.
Now that I remembered it, IIRC, the main reason the economists considered itCompleting the plan in full at all was impossible according to the economists. That we managed it without any book-cooking is amazing in and of itself.
impossible in full
comes down to the fact that their hypotheticals do not include us shovelling 35% of the Union's GNP towards economic development for five years straight. We pretty much redlined the economy to such a point that had we gone the OTL Union route of going full bore Heavy Industry, I think we'd be looking at the best-case scenario of post-war recession due to the lack of civilian/consumer industry.Good point I really enjoyed the newspaper snippet, this time however they will be talking about THE INFINITE POWER OF THE PARTY.That does sort of beg the question what economists abroad and at home will takeaway from the successes of the five year plan, given Mikoyan's emphasis on foreign trade and technocratic culture of the VSNKh there's probably a bit more engagement with western intellectuals on some level than OTL. If Sergo could keep Bazarov's Bazarovness hidden, I don't think our economists bragging about the successes of their central planning model (now with actual data!) is outside the question.
We've just proven that state distortion of market forces with large scale, multi-sector development projects can produce tremendously good results. I'm no economist, but the way I see it we might see a surge of state-business partnerships throughout the western sphere. Instead of destabilizing everything via communist-style nationalizations, the state could sponsor established big businesses within certain strategic economic sectors in order to minimize their losses and incentivize growth. This could allow the state to mobilize the resources of the upper class and the institutional knowledge of the successful big businesses towards the outcomes it wants. If the state is interested in increased standards of living and a stabilized economy, then it can tie tax breaks and permits to increased number of jobs and/or worker benefits. If the state wants more exports to bring in foreign currency, it can crush the unions and give businesses interest-free loans to produce high quality goods to sell at competitive prices to foreign markets.That does sort of beg the question what economists abroad and at home will takeaway from the successes of the five year plan, given Mikoyan's emphasis on foreign trade and technocratic culture of the VSNKh there's probably a bit more engagement with western intellectuals on some level than OTL. If Sergo could keep Bazarov's Bazarovness hidden, I don't think our economists bragging about the successes of their central planning model (now with actual data!) is outside the question.