- Location
- A haze of forgetfulness
- Pronouns
- She/Her
"A few Waco's" against the American left sounds like a pretty *interesting* direction for the country to go by the end of the 80s/start of the 90s...
Well, if there aren't any restrictions, I think the informal standard protest vote for ministerial appointmenta should be comrade-President John M. Ashbrooke, for his contribution to the anti-American struggle.
Bit late but these posts reminded me that OTL Ashbrook literally denounced wreckers during a 1960 campaign speech lol, so clearly comrade Ashbrook was actually a loyal Stalinist all along! Truly it is a pity that he was born in Ohio instead of fulfilling his destiny as one of Stalin's hatchetmen.(not Comrade Ashbrooke though, our most successful ever deep cover agent)
We've found it, the reverse KhrushchevBit late but these posts reminded me that OTL Ashbrook literally denounced wreckers during a 1960 campaign speech lol, so clearly comrade Ashbrook was actually a loyal Stalinist all along! Truly it is a pity that he was born in Ohio instead of fulfilling his destiny as one of Stalin's hatchetmen.
![]()
(source is the Current Biography Yearbook: 1973, page 21)
The classic American conservative approach of doing an economic Wild Ride ending with it crashing into a ditch so the next progressive can be discredited for wasting all of their time dragging it back on the road instead of moving.Stimulation economic policies, expanded spending through supports and attempting a demand side solution for unemployment through government projects, and tax cuts to increase the money supply. This will generate some growth but the inflation from the dual-end spending increases will significantly eat into it and get whoever the poor bastard stuck with everything lambasted over ineffective government spending and the perception of out of control inflation.
Ryzkhov doesn't have the support to do that. Unionism isn't dead, just Semyonov's political career, Dzhussoev and Vorotnikov will probably pick the torch to some extent since his followers didn't just disappear.Welp, we've done it, we've Ryzzed the Simpsov (with Stalinist characteristics!). Best outcome for Bala specifically, but I worry what the consequences of blowing up the career of the USSR's biggest trade unionist will be. Will Ryzz try/succeed to undo the expansion of the State Union and soviet power that happened during Seymonov's tenure? How enthusiastically will Vorotnikov go along with it?
She is talking about the Dems I think. They will make the crisis worse when one likely comes into power in 76, because the economic crisis of the 70s could not be solved by their old Keynesian/New Deal policies.The classic American conservative approach of doing an economic Wild Ride ending with it crashing into a ditch so the next progressive can be discredited for wasting all of their time dragging it back on the road instead of moving.
Ryzkhov doesn't have the support to do that. Unionism isn't dead, just Semyonov's political career, Dzhussoev and Vorotnikov will probably pick the torch to some extent since his followers didn't just disappear.
While we could angle for that going forward, I feel like backing increased power for the workers would really piss off the enterprise managers and a bunch of the rest of Ryzhkov's block after we cut a lot of their funding this plan.There is probably also a non zero chance we could get the non state unions banner behind the ministry again.
Dun dun dun.Minister Effects:
Inexperienced Politician (-4 to Bureaucracy Dice, +2 per Year)
Excellent Administrator (+10 to all non-Bureaucracy Dice)
Chemical Engineer (+10 to rolls in the Chemical Industry)
Decisive Politician (+10 to Bureaucracy Dice, Crit Range 1-3/99-100)
Don't think he is think he is even more uncertain of what he's doing.Oh no, Bala's gotten overconfident. He think he's hot shit and has started gambling and calling it decisiveness.
Whatever could you mean? The man has pulled off a political master play and in so doing moved from the weaker position to one of Ryzhkov's most trusted allies and a man Vorotnikov knows can be worked with, securing both himself and the ministry in the process. Clearly, all he needs to do is to repeat the same character of actions again, and success will follow.Oh no, Bala's gotten overconfident. He think he's hot shit and has started gambling and calling it decisiveness.
Dun dun dun.
Hey everyone, who likes 1 in 20 crit chance each political roll? Balakirev sure does!
To be clear I mean this five year plan. The chance of a single critfail in a given turn is only 21%.Yeah don't know how the hell he is going to survive one more turn with that.
This guy. He's not bad enough to call "Gamer", but he definitely will not be making any improvements to the country like Seymonov's man would have. Man, I regret couping him now.Minister of the Interior(MVD): Vladimir Grigoriavich Lomonosov(1975): Rising in a career that originally began with work in Moscow metallurgical plants but has steadily climbed to positions of greater importance. He took on responsibilities as part of the MVD in the post Mikoyan re-organization, heading a softening of internal policy while not compromising the essential elements of state policy. Conservative but ardently against expanding the repression, prioritizing the increase to security forces for the sake of peace and the reduction in criminality. Lomonosov is likely to be focused on further reforms against criminality and comprehensive work to strengthen the defense of the state against criminal elements.
Current Major Programs:
- Politically Neutral
- Work Focused Obsessive
- Anti-Criminal
- Idealistic
- Disciplinarian
- Mechanical Engineer
-Expanding Internal Policing Forces
-Expanding Court Throughput
-Reforming the Justice System
First of all, we finally get a look at Vorotnikov and Ryzkhov proper, in their roles as General Secretary and Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet (CPSS). You will note the section they are under is "Government of the Soviet Union/Presidium of the Council of Ministers" the latter is the highest organ of the Council of Ministers, which includes the heads of all the most important Ministers in the Union (the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Interior, Defense, Finance, State Security and National Economy). This implies that now, the General Secretary and the CPSS have a official seat at the Council, denoting its increased importance. Its important to remember that Vorotnikov was the dominant force in it previously, and thus had a strong incentive to empower it once he had the chance. The appointals of a neutral MinFin and MinInt were seemingly a compromise to get him onboard, since it wouldn't make much sense for him to empower the council and then put in a bunch of Ryzkhov fans in it.Blackstar said:Government of the Soviet Union/Presidium of the Council of Ministers
Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet: Nikolai Ivanovich Ryzhkov(1974): Podgorny's client and one of the strongest proponents for state dominance over party organs alongside the development of a government that clarifies the Mikoyanist system. His career started from the Ural polytechnic institute, rapidly rising through the management of Uralmash followed by the city commission propelling him into a political career that was rapidly capitalized on with his own reformist attitudes appealing to Podgorny. Currently, he plans to prepare the Union for large-scale economic confrontation over direct confrontation with the capitalist powers, modernizing the economy and starting reforms to party structures.
- State Basis of Power
- Opponent of Party Orthodoxy
- Systems Focused Politics
- Capable Administrator
- Demand Side Economics
- Reformer
General Secretary: Vitaly Ivanovich Vorotnikov(1975): Building a career somewhat in the shadow of Romanov after getting into Leningrad politics after graduating as a Mechanical Engineer. Rapidly climbing through work managing military and technical production around Leningrad, he partially got into politics as a major coordinating force working with Romanov as a hedge against ministry betrayals. His arrival into power came with the current consolidation with an emergency plenum called to hold a vote to first remove Semyonov and then elect Vorotnikov as the new general secretary alongside several important allies. Currently he is focused on ensuring that the economy does not radically change while increasing the global strength of Soviet Influence.
- Technocrat Successor
- Mikoyanist System Proponent
- Cybernetics Proponent
- Political Hawk
- Socially Conservative
- Conservative
Was replaced by this guy:Blackstar said:Ministry of Finance
Minister: Nikolai Viktorovich Garetovsky(1969): Promoted after a career in the Ministry of Finance as the direct assistant to Garbuzov, Garetovsky is to a large extent a direct continuation. He is effectively one of the largest advocates for increasing the extent of financial mechanisms in the planned economy along with strengthening Gosbank. Continued work in the department is expected as debt balances expand to increase the rate of modernization of the enterprises. Further, he is a close ally of Semyonov and his advancement has led to the push of several of Romanov's suggestions elsewhere in the council of ministers.
Current Major Programs:
- Semyonov 's Faction
- Market focused
- Euro Proponent
- Financial Expansionist
- Mathematical Economist
- Maximum Growth Focus
-Preparing for Large Scale Currency Shifts
-Ensuring Currency and Trade Stability
-Expanding Financial Sector Activity
First thing to note, is that he was a compromise between Vortnikov and Semyonov. Him being a proponent of the Euro (which Ryzkhov favored and Vorotnikov disfavored last turn), a Market Cyberneticist (more of Vorotnikov's thing) and "Politically Neutral" reinforce the notion he is a compromise. This makes his position weak in a sense because he has no direct backer right now, if a crisis were to occur he would be a natural scapegoat for us which is something to keep in mind.Blackstar said:Minister of Finance: Ivan Yakovlevich Naumenko(1975): Moved into the Ministry as Finance as a compromise between Vorotnikov and Ryzhkov on the budgets of the economy. Technically one of the protages of Masherov if several steps removed Naumenko is a doctor of mathematical economics that has managed the Vitebsk regional office of Gosbank for several years before advancing into conventional party career. His economic line is primarily conventional with several papers on optimal direction of the economic system alongside the management of cybernetic effects in both directed and market systems. The Ministry is currently at its weakest point, so his influence is unlikely to be felt in the short term barring a major economic crisis.
Current Major Programs:
- Politically Neutral
- Market Cyberneticist
- Euro Proponent
- Conservative Economist
- Mathematical Economist
- Academician
-Rationalizing state budgets
-Starting moderate scale economic test cases
-Monitoring the rapid expansion of Gosbank
I believe you are reading it wrong. "Chemicalization" is not just plastics, it's the focus of effort on trying to address the oil crisis by using the whole of the crude we extract, minimizing waste. Bala, not without reason, sees it as trying to empty the ocean with a spoon, and thus limits it to the development of plastics, wonder material that is worth the efforts.BIG change in the opinion on Biryukov. Klimenko said he had experience developing new oils, but Balakirev says he favors plastics over new oils. What happened? Despite calling him a "good organizer" Balakirev considers it necessary to silo him into plastics to "prevent any damage to more important efforts". Strange to see Bala have such a dim view of plastics. The two clearly do not get along.