EDIT: Sorry, posted this before seeing DP had closed the vote. Fuck.
Sorry about that @TalonofAnathrax vote stays open. I jumped the gun there. The last thing I want to do is kill discussion.
EDIT: Sorry, posted this before seeing DP had closed the vote. Fuck.
I also got a few likes of people who were already voting for me though.Of course it's not going to turn. You got most of those votes overnight when your plan was extremely similar to the one that is now mine. Then you switched to something completely different both in message and in tone, got three votes for it (compared to my two - I think there's nobody voting at this hour). 3 votes vs the 15 you got when you voted for your old plan...
My core problem with that is that you are actively undermining our chances to even make the Leviathan a thing. If government policy takes a hard swerve towards piety, we will not get the necessary juice for it and will be stuck with appeasing the faiths.My plan is a lot more reassuring. And the Gods have in fact been our main (secret) policy, that's why we've been researching god-crafting for ages. Permanently destroying Hell? Not something we've considered except as a distant dream. Even ending the Brass Bastard's mistreatment of souls is a plan that deeply relies on Gods + off-Plane allies (although our military does feature there too).
Honestly I'm not saying we shouldn't be growing our army. I just focus the speech on what they can easily imagine, trust and conceptualize (their Gods who have protected them for thousands of years) instead of on mortal armies.
I'd rather not have to rewrite that speech since it came out pretty good, but I'm getting the feeling you will insist on keeping this vote open until I do, as I don't expect any big movements and you seem certain that my vote winning is illegitimate.I also don't try to scare them even more before reassuring them. That doesn't seem needed at all in this situation.
So 5 out of 18 people like your new plan. That still leaves 13 who voted for your old plan (which is effectively my current vote).I also got a few likes of people who were already voting for me though.
Me: BronzeTongue, Crake, Microtec, plan liked and acknowledged by Duesal, QueenPally and zxzx24
You: Tutan0ss, Trevor23
And could we please not go back to "you are sneaking stuff in"?
I changed my mind after there was more opposition to your heavy god angle. That is all.
We've already left it open way longer then usual and since this whole topic is dragging already, I'd rather not drag it out even further.So 5 out of 18 people like your new plan. That still leaves 13 who voted for your old plan (which is effectively my current vote).
And your plan doesn't just change the Gods issue. It also has a completely different tone. We're trying to reassure people, and you start by freaking them out even harder. Not great, IMO.
Honestly, you may have a point with the "too many Gods" thing. It deserves to get debated. BronzeTongue brought it up, and it's a fair point. I just happen to prefer Goldfish's objections, and also think that a heavy use of friendly Gods is absolutely not new for our Empire and isn't something we should disavow or hide. It's reassuring, effective, and is an excellent rhetorical gambit. We'll be completely transfoming the perfection everyone has of this when we unveil our godcrafting (Leviathan) anyway, so I'm not convinced by BronzeTongue's idea that this will permanently shape discourse and perception about this issue. I just think we should leave the vote open longer because right now the voting situation is a little weird.
It is though. We just told them effectively that they don't believe hard enough in their gods, so they might get lost and eaten by demons. The conclusion of that, if we emphasize the gods further, is "pray harder!", which leads to zealotry.I also dislike the accusation of "zealotry". My plan emphasizes our personal prowess and the role of our armies too! I also wave the cloak around, remind people of our military victories, etc.
I just also make it clear that in the short term this isn't an immediate crisis. "There are Gods you already trust who are keeping you safe. Calm down, and work with me on this!"
Fine. Fine. Time is probably better spent editing than arguing.EDIT: Honestly I could vote for Azel's plan myself if it reassured them from the start. No need to freak them out even further. I understand the logic of fear followed by hope to motivate people to action, but we aren't really trying to get these people to do anything difficult right now. All that we want is for them to know this, don't freak out, and keep it in mind for future decisions.
What exactly is your plan saying in response to those things? "Don't worry, we'll conquer Hell for you" is a massive lie. We're absolutely nowhere near doing that.It is though. We just told them effectively that they don't believe hard enough in their gods, so they might get lost and eaten by demons. The conclusion of that, if we emphasize the gods further, is "pray harder!", which leads to zealotry.
What will you tell Mace if he divines that Olenna, a woman who I'd hardly call pious, is Demon chow now?
What if Darry's brothers are wasting away in Abaddon because they didn't believe hard enough in the Seven?
What do we tell Ned when it turns out that his brother missed the Green Dream and is no fighting for his life in the ruins of Elysium?
You plan is answering all of this with "more faith! more piety!", so of course they will do so and most likely will overcorrect.
Edit:
Fine. Fine. Time is probably better spent editing than arguing.
This, but unironically The Seven don't have the power to be a problem in the short term. The OG are definitely on our side. Most other religions are non-issues at our scale.Fanatical religious belief that you are a divine envoy come to save the world, that was one way to assure loyalty, the Duke of Hightower thought.
That's not what I'm saying though. I'm making vague promises of hope since we can't discuss the practical steps. I'm only telling them that we will fight for this and we have to fight for this together, but I'm not making any direct policy proposals. I'm not even mentioning Baator, let alone making promises of conquering it.What exactly is your plan saying in response to those things? "Don't worry, we'll conquer Hell for you" is a massive lie. We're absolutely nowhere near doing that.
Talon. The people we are talking to have power and can act on their own. They will give the faiths this power if we tell them to seek their salvation in faith.What exactly is your plan saying in response to those things? "Don't worry, we'll conquer Hell for you" is a massive lie. We're absolutely nowhere near doing that.
Meanwhile, more religious people isn't a huge problem now that we've denied them direct power. And we have a fairly good handle on the biggest faith around (Red Faith, most of who think we're the messiah) and are offering a big pile of substitutes and competition at the same time.
Does it merit saying that we don't want that to happen, or have we said this often enough before?Talon. The people we are talking to have power and can act on their own. They will give the faiths this power if we tell them to seek their salvation in faith.
Will these undead have the same problems that other non-Qyburned undead have?He is still tucked in his tomb, if you guys need a Sword Wight with with I think 6 levels of fighter and a magic hamer, just ask, Bloodraven can open the tomb on that. He comes with a free army of low level undead.
No need to say it. Not only have we been clear about it, we've also made it impossible for these people to do much about it They also can't publicly share the news, either. At worst religions will get more indirect social power if these people give them cash and/or opportunities to proselytize in their lands.Does it merit saying that we don't want that to happen, or have we said this often enough before?
Will these undead have the same problems that other non-Qyburned undead have?
I'd rather not point this out too directly since I don't want to position us too harshly opposed to faith either.Does it merit saying that we don't want that to happen, or have we said this often enough before?
Not until we get Westeros up to snuff probably, and even then we have fronts on our own turf to worry about before we try to fight wars on their shores."Can we help them then, can we send aid? To these distant fortresses I mean?" Lord Stark asked into the silence that followed. "Would any aid of ours be enough to help stem the tide?"