- Location
- France
I see what you mean. However :I still think that this level of democratic reformation makes very little sense given the context of Viserys' background. So far the extent of his meritocratic tendencies have been limited to making people who prove themselves into nobles.
Viserys has the life experience to get the political implications of all these new powerful merchants and mages, but that doesn't mean he'll approach the problem the same way a true reformist would.
In my opinion at least, he'd go for creating more ways for the exceptional to rise up to the powerful political classes and just enough power to the masses to keep everyone who can't meet the standard content.
The current proposal is designed to slowly kill the social class that Viserys identifies with and draws many political ideas from. His problems to date have always been with the sort of people taking aristocratic roles, not the existence of those positions themselves.
I'm not saying he'd leave them unchecked, but these councils are shaping up to clearly push the kind of political traditions that hastened the fall of monarchies in real life. If there was no choice but this to solve the various political problems he faced sure, but why exactly would a staunch monarchist turned dragon emperor suddenly stumble into the political position of an English burgher from the 1300-1500s?
Edit: To be clear, my problem with this is not based on principle. This is a perfectly good way to slowly advance a society towards democracy, and all things considered it's the best form of government we have so far.
My issue is more that it feels like we have a checklist of things a "modern, advanced" society needs, and are slowly working our way through the social phases required to reach them like a civ tech tree.
It doesn't seem to me that it considers the opinions that people like Viserys and his political contemporaries would actually have, or any routes forward that lead to places other than where we've already decided to go.
- Viserys doesn't believe in the natural inferiority of non-nobles
- Viserys does believe in doing what's best for the people
- Viserys wants the Voices not because he believes in democracy or the electoral process (he's strongly against "mob rule" IC) but because they're a pressure valve against crime, plotting and civil unrest
- Viserys arguably will weaken the social class he came from, and strengthen a meritocratic, bureaucratic class of administrators. This is certainly not democracy or anything modern, but it isn't traditional feudal nobility either.
It is indeed correct that in the long term the existence of Voices will certainly create social pressures against nobles, but this is when our other social changes come in :
- IRL, the demand for democracy was largely created by rich middle classes who were struggling against the aristocracy. In our setting there are a number of ways for these rich and powerful non-aristocrats to gain power, influence and prestige.
- People don't fight for democracy : things are sparked by another issue, and people then want democracy as a way of fixing various other issues. People generally rebel because they want more bread or less poverty or something, not directly because of the ideals.
- We control the media and education system, which is already open to all. Defending the advantages of a singular leadership which isn't directly beholden to regular elections is easy for us (and these advantages do exist, and are sincerely believed in by a large portion of the setting's current elites).
- Arguably, increased long-term pressure in favor of democracy is worth it to decrease the likelihood of rebellion and tensions now. Indeed, the current Voices make it more likely that we'll manage to nip increases in such tensions in the bud.
Last edited: