- Location
- France
The second one is indeed far better. However, just to check : @DragonParadox, where's that post with average incomes for various professions? And how much does a house or smallfolk farm cost?
You're looking for a tax that does nothing but keep the mega-wealthy in check. Goldfish and I are implementing fairly standard progressive wealth taxes (one on income and a smaller one on capital) which will also keep the mega-wealthy in check.Sorry, I just got to work, can't really post. Should have waited until I had a minute to be more specific.
I don't think something like a progressive tax starting at 20-30% of red scale holdings income for individuals would be too complicated or unreasonable. A single person making over 20% of a state run holding company's revenue is probably making enough to be a potential problem. I just don't know how to convince anyone that it's acceptable IC. In any case, the floor for this tax applying should be so high that it effectively doesn't apply to anyone currently. No one has had the time to accumulate the kind of wealth that we're worried about challenging us. It will also make it easier to put this law on the books it if doesn't apply to anyone, and easier to actually enforce if it's been on the books for years by the time anyone thinks to complain.
@DragonParadox, please tell me if I'm wrong :
Currently in-setting there isn't a flat income tax for the rich. Instead, there are specific taxes on the production of certain types of goods, and tolls on roads and ports for merchants. This suggestion suggests that we will remove or lower many of these taxes, and instead tax overall income/property.
Does Braavos tax dividends at all?
This makes us more able to respond to flexible economic situations. No "this rich businessman pays no taxes because we didn't think to tax human souls", or whatever weird new way to make money just became possible with magic. And this system also applies far, far better to a service economy (and ours is growing fast!).
Last edited: