Also, because the molten gold thing was mentioned, I can't get the image of Viserys doing a spa day out of my head. But instead of sitting in a bathtub full of hot mud, he sits in a furnace full of molten gold.
But he still has two slices of cucumber on his eyes.
Remember that interlude ages ago, when we saw Viserys use Fiery Burst to heat himself a positively boiling bath?
Imagine that, but in the Mercury Lake in Dragon form and with Shadow of the Doom.
I read this three times and understood 0% of it, please help?
We still have that entire list of magical plants. Including magic horse grass.
Damn that magic horse grass is amazing.
...A strip of skin inscribed with runes of power flies into your hand, leaving you watching in grim satisfaction as the body of ice shatters, but rather than the acid you had anticipated from the remains rises a narrow tongue of familiar green flame... Wildfire.
Alright. We do know that Westeros currently has food shortages in the cities, most likely due to unsafe trading routes. We are also late in the year, so the impact of the ritual spread will be low before winter rolls around. People who use the ritual will produce more, thus making a tidy profit due to the high grain prices.
So let's make a little speculation bubble.
First step is to increase the grain price further to make grain production more attractive. To this end, we work with Baelish and counsel Robert to set up high grain tariffs. That drives up the price in Westeros, exacerbates the shortages and will be highly unpopular, but also drives the price in Essos down and 'hurts Viserys bigly', so Robert should go for it.
What it will actually do for us is very little. We are already taking measures against grain price decline and this will do little damage, but reinforce Viserys reputation as a business sorcerer and allow us to build up grain supplies for long campaign's without having to increase the Legions budget. At the same time, we can counsel grain magnates in Essos to diversify and to simply store the excess grain, reasoning that they can make a killing on the Westerosi market when Robert is forced to drop the tariffs because of shortages threatening to become full on famines.
Meanwhile, Littlefinger and we embezzle a chunk of that sweet tariff money and promote the ritual and expanded grain production in Westeros. After all, prices are high and thus it's both necessary to keep people fed and a sound investment.
Come spring, shortages are becoming bad. Littlefinger now approaches Robert to drop the tariffs to prevent famines. Both Littlefinger and we get a hefty price for grain we bought up while it was cheap. Grain floods into the market and prices fall.
And now comes the harvest. The greatest harvest in Westeros history. Except there are no buyers. Prices plummet and the Westerosi economy flatlines.
Now if there just was someone who could help the pissed off smallfolk to get rid of the idiot in Kings Landing who caused this...
honestly, it just made it all messier for me.
honestly, it just made it all messier for me.
What point are you arguing against?
Is it about that thing (on which existence in on a fence still) with Azel presumably manipulating votes via "we did bad things before, we should continue now*"?
Is it against doing that sort of thing at all with any kind of action, be it 'good' or 'bad'?
Then where are you coming from with this?
I think I missed some post or something, because I can't quite see what caused this train of thought from you.
I certainly don't see ZXZX arguing that.
I thought we kind of settled on that the night before already.
:/
*oversimplified, but what can one do, I'm sleepy.
...I need some sleep, ill try to understand what are you saying tomorrow.It's the divorcing of context from the things we do, and then comparing them to the things we're discussing doing.
Id suggest getting deep background and history on the Githzerai, since that didn't happen this turn.And this is the point where I'd like to officially remind everyone, that I'm keeping track of Minor Actions for the following months already, and would appreciate any suggestions.
Like, for one, this nebulous horse weed of which I can't remember pretty much anything.
@zxzx24, would you mind drawing up a list of said herbs to buy next turn, so l'll mark it down?
Still on the list.Id suggest getting deep background and history on the Githzerai, since that didn't happen this turn.
Its not so much I don't understand what you are doing, as I don't understand what brought this on, and the need for such discussion et al.I don't know how to make it any easier to understand, seeing as how the above is the simplest explanation for what I'm talking about that is possible.
You are missing the point.honestly, it just made it all messier for me.
What point are you arguing against?
Is it about that thing (on which existence in on a fence still) with Azel presumably manipulating votes via "we did bad things before, we should continue now*"?
Is it against doing that sort of thing at all with any kind of action, be it 'good' or 'bad'?
Then where are you coming from with this?
I think I missed some post or something, because I can't quite see what caused this train of thought from you.
I certainly don't see ZXZX arguing that.
I thought we kind of settled on this issue the night before already.
:/
*oversimplified, but what can one do, I'm sleepy.
ah. That's what I implied (or tried to, anyway) by this part:You are missing the point.
@Crake is not complaining about action, they're complaining about debating tactics.
These tactics are not only rather intellectually dishonest, but they also create a constant fear: "We can't allow this to happen or it will be wielded against us forever in debates!"
That is Crake's point here. Right?
I'm just highly confused here over what exactly started the train of thought.Is it against doing that sort of thing at all with any kind of action, be it 'good' or 'bad'?
The ship sinks with everyone on it. Unless your a dragon in which case you fly away with the power of pure badassery.I am no longer going to dredge up the past as if they are confirmation of the present, seeing as how each situation in principle is unique in context, and also the fact that you can choose to do something else, this is supposed to be a game and not only that but what if a bunch of other voters come in and they feel like their agency is deprived if they can't reconsider a course of action simply because you were part of a few votes months or weeks ago where similar action happened?
It is the responsibility of the writer to justify the course of action voted upon in narrative and in prose, and of the voter to attempt to vote for something that they feel would be a course of action that makes sense.
Liberating Slaver's Bay and then pawning it off on the Archon's a year and a half ago without any plans or intentions of helping them keep it from blowing up would have been an incorrect course of action, seeing as even back then Viserys had already realized the implications of outlawing slavery in a slavery driven economy, which is why our conquest took so long in the first place. We had already infiltrated a ruler's palace by subterfuge, grabbing the reigns of power isn't an issue here, it is actually coupling the reigns of power with the mechanisms of rule that is a problem, and to do that you have to have the support (or at least compliance) of the people you rule over. That takes more things than magic or a strong sword arm.
Thus doing the above is not in character.
But Viserys was bitter about Tywin and Robert prospering upon the corpses of his dead family, including children, and has long struggled with the association of callous cruelty his father committed, whatever the justification, with the responsibilities of rule. How do you define what is justifiable violence, punishment, or even out and out, without legal course, murder? How do you manage to divorce madness and instinct from those actions when you do have to take them?
If we keep bringing up old issues near constantly to justify pushing boundaries for nebulous purposes, I dare say the times we have done "nice things" for people would be used as justification to do thoughtless "feel good" actions that actually have nebulous benefit to the people you are being nice to, and may in fact harm them in the long term.
This ship sinks with everyone on it, for Christ's sake.
We can't.Should we leave a calling card in Cersei's room? Maybe a three headed dragon figurine and a note. Maybe saying "a gift to your son" or something to that effect. Raving lunatic Cersei is fun
Correct.You are missing the point.
@Crake is not complaining about action, they're complaining about debating tactics.
These tactics are not only rather intellectually dishonest, but they also create a constant fear: "We can't allow this to happen or it will be wielded against us forever in debates!"
That is Crake's point here. Right?
We can't.We're making an effort not to leave signs of Targaryen infiltration because we plan to send spies into the Red Keep. If Cersei and Robert knew that we were here then their paranoia would run rampant, and we'd end up destroying our own chances for sending spies.
If this wasn't a problem we would have just told Myrcella we were a "Silver Prince" and given her chocolate and a nice Dragon King festival figurine.
however that girl from... Takesis' omake, I think?.. However she might lie to herself, that would be both a strategic boon for us, and a genuinely nice thing to do.[] Have as many illithid-tainted citizens of your realm purged of this taint by holy waters of Merlin King.
-[] If taint is considerably high and has a high chance of wreaking a serious injury or death upon purging (tentacles on the inside, completely transformed tainted appendages, etc) - apply all necessary healing services available, up to calling on Vee for Regeneration spell.