The Armor of Von Dead Guy is still the Armor of a Guy Who Is Dead. There's a difference, but the whole reason I brought it up was to show that it was irrelevant, and that you were bringing up gruesome imagery to dunk on my personal preferences for no reason.
Did you know that the elves put on a parade where they show off a cloak made of Dawi beards stitched together? I don't give a single hoot about paranoid elves who might feel hurt by the
possibility that Mathilde is wearing armor reforged from war trophies. Contrary to what you've said, it is not actually obvious that she got it from Vlag, and in fact if we wanted to we could bloody well arrange it so that we're
factually not making it out of war trophies either - if you think it's
that much of an issue, just trade with Laurelorn for an equal weight in scrap ithilmar taken from what we sold to them from the library!
But
I do not care about it that much, because Ulthuan has no way of knowing which source of ithilmar we used
anyways. How would they tell the difference? How would they even know that Vlag's war trophies were an
option? The last time they sent anyone there was Telcis, who could see no way to bring Vlag back! Do you think they will just assume some human wizard from Telcis's pet project will outdo the head of the white tower and call it obvious?
Really? Even if they get a report about it, do you think they will be credulous of it, or who it attributes to the deed?
As for the hill dwarves - they gave Thorek access to it willingly. Not unpressured, but willingly. And even then, that's
one source of runelore we'd be delving, you're ignoring the rest of the guilds we'd be compiling info from.
I'll admit the narrative of cooperation is a bit weaker with the eonir no longer having a role in the creation of the armor beyond perhaps offering some of their remaining runed ithilmar items for study. Can we ask them for that,
@Boney?
No. I was saying I didn't find somebody else's vision personally compelling, and saying what narrative I preferred. You can say you don't prefer it, you can say you don't find it compelling, but you can't say I'm wrong for liking it.
You can, perhaps, follow my example and say those things while describing the narrative that
you prefer and why it resonates with you more. That's constructive!
If other people think my view of it is compelling, well, sure, that's neat. But you're still telling me "feel bad for the poor dead elves whose armor is being smelted" and I'm still saying "I don't care". That isn't going to change if you keep doing the same thing over and over again. Please stop it.