Remove ads

Starfleet Design Bureau

Linked contents
Starship Design Bureau Starfleet Design Bureau
Reader mode
[] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)

Edit: changed mind on Nov 7th to In-line deflector, have posted vote then.
 
Last edited:
[X] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)
 
[X] Inline Deflector (Maximum Warp: -0.4)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)
 
[X] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)
 
[X] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)
 
I almost feel like this should be a plan vote, because voting for a combo seems more important than the individual components.

So I'm putting them here.... except it's early morning, I just woke up, and I'm not sure I'm doing it right. If the next person can fix it that would be great.


-[] Plan Everything
--[] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
--[] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)

-[] Plan Saucer
--[] Inline Deflector (Maximum Warp: -0.4)
--[] Low-Power Warp Core (Maximum Warp: -0.6)

-[] Plan Blister
--[] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
-- [] Low-Power Warp Core (Maximum Warp: -0.6)

-[] Plan Warp Core
--[] Inline Deflector (Maximum Warp: -0.4)
--[] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)
 
[X] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)

Even with both of these, the ship is still smaller than the Archer by a third. Cost also isn't a factor to me, to this degree - no matter what, a specialist design like this is unlikely to be built in enormous numbers when Starfleet needs generalist designs to fill out the ranks.

Also, I'm not wedded to compacting our ships - canonically, Starfleet designs get bigger over time, and more space means more room for expanded facilities.
 
I have a stupid idea we get the neck and the engineering section and we do a saucer separation so that the saucer can land.. I might be a bit nuts
 
[ ] Blister Deflector (Mass: +10,000 Tons) (Cost: +2)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)

edit: Changed my vote because apparently the mass of the nacelles hasn't been factored in and I'd like to keep this thing below 100k tons.

[X] Inline Deflector (Maximum Warp: -0.4)
 
Last edited:
[X] Inline Deflector (Maximum Warp: -0.4)
[X] Standard Warp Core (Mass: +25,000 Tons) (Cost: +4)

Very High Maneuverability on one thruster + engineering module space
 
Sayle said:
The standard model covers eight decks,
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Wait, I thought we made ours seven deck?

Sayle said:
But it does provide some advantages for future starships, as well as reducing the height of the warp core to seven decks, down from eight.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Yeah, this deck is the deck that made refits impossible and almost cost us the entire Federation.

Sayle, can we please have our Federation destroying deck back?
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top