Given the inherently matriarchal nature of Formians and the manner in which they are supernaturally linked into their hive hierarchy, shouldn't this instead be "Queen Tywin"? 🧐
Well, two out of three did.It's hilarious that even Khal Rhango's bloodriders had more integrity than Ser Barristan. They knew they were screwed in their duel with Viserys, and they still charged and died because honor demanded it after he slew their khal.
Selmy wasn't punished though. He just also wasn't given a position of wealth and prestige in the new regime, which is what he was asking for.This has very little to do with Rhaella and her treatment- most Westerosi Lords did the same. They merit no respect, but no punishment either
Meanwhile in Casterly Rock:Given the inherently matriarchal nature of Formians and the manner in which they are supernaturally linked into their hive hierarchy, shouldn't this instead be "Queen Tywin"? 🧐
The oaths of a kingsguard are far more strict than those of random lords, they are supposed to be more like those of a Black Brother of the Watch since they are for life and forswearing any other alliance. If a Brother of the Watch breaks their vows, they are made outlaw no ifs and buts, their life forfeit.
That clip is from "Ali G Indahouse".Okay, this hideous. Where can I find more of this?
I need to know for... "research".
There are two major oaths Ser Barristan swore." I, X , hereby swear on my honour and my allegiance to protect the King and his family. I will do my duties until death, and through that time, keep all secrets of the King safe from spread. I will not speak unless spoken to, and I will defend the King's land or pay the price. I will wed no wife, sire no children and hold no land. I will master the gate, pluck the bow, handle the blade and serve my realm: for now and forever".
I don't see anywhere provisions for the oath to protect others FROM the King, nor an obligation to act as the King's moral watchdogs. In fact, it specifically requires a Kingsguard to not act or give counsel unless ordered to.
I also took the liberty of reading the books, and Barristan there hardly sees himself as any sort of hero. He's a tired old man who sees himself as a failure twice over, and merely wants an uncomplicated post protecting a worthy King. Where did this smug, self-assurance come from? I just don't see where Barristan deserves any form of the cold shoulder. If anything, just tell him that the world has moved on and that he can retire in peace.
" I, X , hereby swear on my honour and my allegiance to protect the King and his family. I will do my duties until death, and through that time, keep all secrets of the King safe from spread. I will not speak unless spoken to, and I will defend the King's land or pay the price. I will wed no wife, sire no children and hold no land. I will master the gate, pluck the bow, handle the blade and serve my realm: for now and forever".
I don't see anywhere provisions for the oath to protect others FROM the King, nor an obligation to act as the King's moral watchdogs. In fact, it specifically requires a Kingsguard to not act or give counsel unless ordered to.
I also took the liberty of reading the books, and Barristan there hardly sees himself as any sort of hero. He's a tired old man who sees himself as a failure twice over, and merely wants an uncomplicated post protecting a worthy King. Where did this smug, self-assurance come from? I just don't see where Barristan deserves any form of the cold shoulder. If anything, just tell him that the world has moved on and that he can retire in peace.
It's more that both dislike Barristan for their own reasons -- Ser Richard for him betraying his oaths as Kingsguard and swearing to the Baratheon usurpers, and Sandor just for thinking Ser Barristan is a high and mighty prick. That's it. Neither expressed that they were more "knightly". Hell, Sandor explicitly never wants to be knighted. They only voiced their contempt for the man's hypocrisy.Edit: I see that the ship has sailed, but I still think that Sandor and Richard patting themselves on the back for being more 'Knightly' than Barristan is Rage-inducing. Richard was a washed-up has-been who has come far *because* he shacked up with us on impulse and we had magic. Sandor was little more than a weapon we fashioned to beat in Gregor Clegane IC and OOC a recipient of the thread's 'Canon Pokemon' amusements.
Even Jaime gets acknowledged by Viserys for his good deeds even if we killed him. If we are going to snub Barristan, I'd at least like a more holistic look at his life and deeds as befits Viserys rather than treating him like a traitor.
Well, that can never be unseen... 😵
There are two major oaths Ser Barristan swore.
His knightly oaths, and his kingsguard oaths.
His knightly oaths charged him to protect the innocent.
"[Name of knight-to-be], do you swear before the eyes of gods and men to defend those who cannot defend themselves, to protect all women and children, to obey your captains, your liege lord, and your king, to fight bravely when needed and do such other tasks as are laid upon you, however hard or humble or dangerous they may be?"
It wasn't just him. Every Kingsguard failed this oath when they stood by and did nothing while Aerys raped Rhaella and started burning people. Jaime at least did the right thing in the end and killed Aerys before he could burn the city.
But fine. Barristan swore his Kingsguard oath, that takes precedence over the knightly oath, right? Except it didn't. He betrayed his king and turned his cloak to serve Robert instead. He oh so conveniently forgot that there were still two Targaryens alive in Essos.
This isn't about Barristan seeing himself as a hero, it's about presenting himself as honorable. He is not.
Edit: I see that the ship has sailed, but I still think that Sandor and Richard patting themselves on the back for being more 'Knightly' than Barristan is Rage-inducing. Richard was a washed-up has-been who has come far *because* he shacked up with us on impulse and we had magic. Sandor was little more than a weapon we fashioned to beat in Gregor Clegane IC and OOC a recipient of the thread's 'Canon Pokemon' amusements.
Even Jaime gets acknowledged by Viserys for his good deeds even if we killed him. If we are going to snub Barristan, I'd at least like a more holistic look at his life and deeds as befits Viserys rather than treating him like a traitor.
Well it's not the worst thing I've ever seen... by much.
I have an idea , Zahir is a god of liberation and there for both powerful and able enough to undo the binding utterly in way that would normally be impossible , would it be possible for best Coatl to back trace the connection back to Tywin and break the binding over the whole Lanister family cause few things pave the way for conquest like a house divided doubly so in times of crises-[X] Tygett will be bottled and then handed over to the Inquisition. They will use the Gates to immediately bring him to the Imperial Palace and it's maximum security holding cells for in-depth interrogation, mental checks and mind reading by Bloodraven. For his actions he will still be branded traitor, but due to the mitigating circumstances he will be sent to the Wall or exiled, not executed.
Normally he wouldn't. It's just that Barristan's action and inaction directly harmed his mother for years, so he wouldn't be inclined to understanding in this case.I agree. I'm just not sure that Viserys, who himself takes a very dim view of 'honour' compared to 'victory' would go out of his way to belittle him for it. It's not like Viserys himself has even remotely upheld any ideals of honour or fair play. He did what he needed to win, including false flag operations. As I said before, the world has moved on, and Barristan is behind the times, not a traitor.
Anyway, what's done is done. Onward to the future!
Edit: Though I would like to see Rhaella's perspective on this at some point. Maybe they meet in an interlude later on or something?