Also, guarantee you that this entire vote's premise is basically about how if the Inquisition burns down someone's home, even an upscale one, the cost is usually something as small as 500 IM for a successful local businessman's property.
But if they end up burning down the estate, and the extended family come forward claiming damages even if their father/uncle was a madman about to usher in a new era of darkness, they will cite the property lost (expensive paintings, statues, rugs, antiques) with ephemeral valuation in the tens of thousands of IM.
Basically we should absolutely not repay people for lost artwork or luxury commodities. But we absolutely should repay people for destroying vital infrastructure, or even just more practical personal property effects. I would be inclined to pay the cost of rebuilding a large countryside manse, to be honest, but I would be extremely reluctant to allow grifters to mention the priceless painting by X or Y person which might very well have been a fake anyway.
How I would handle that
@DragonParadox BTW is basically to tell the person that since there is no proof of an object's value beyond the authenticity of direct examination and what private collectors are willing to pay, the Crown won't provide compensation for certain items. But the more obvious stuff, even paying to rebuild a mansion with exported high quality materials? I bet you it won't cost more than a couple thousand IM.
It deflects associations of the Inquisition as "HERE WE COME TO SAVE THE DAY" assholes who you're almost as unhappy to see as a demonic invasion, and reassures people that the Crown is interested in taking responsibility, but absolutely uninterested in getting ripped off.