Remove ads

A Sword Without a Hilt: A Song of Ice and Fire/D&D 3.5 Crossover

Reader mode
Speed53066 said:
@Goldfish
Don't forget to to a quick sense person incase there is that one invisible person as a backup.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I'm assuming that everyone has done some buffing up to this point, including activating True Seeing earrings, casting Greater Arcane Sight, etc. There was plenty of time to do it en route, and that's just SOP for us now.
Arawndil said:
[X] Goldfish

Angelic Aspect will be fun to explain to Dayne.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Viserys: "Yeah, she's an angel. I hired her right out from under the Seven. They're shitty bosses."

:p
 
065tdsa said:
It's powerful enough, but when would we even have the occasion to use it? Let alone source the components, and after we get them there's the whole 'this literally runs on baby sacrifice' problem.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

There are easier ways to lay down such a thing. Just sacrifice the Head of the House and the curse could easily go down the line if we really wanted it to.
 
Duesal said:
Just because we don't have an immediate use for it doesn't mean we won't benefit from having the lore. The more knowledge we have the greater a foundation we have to build on for other things.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Deliberately killing children is one of the few standards Viserys has, considering this ritual require you to murder an unborn child, I doubt we would ever use it.

Not saying Viserys wont kill children in battle, or give orders that might result in their death, just saying that deliberately killing an innocent child, is not something I see him doing.
 
tarrangar said:
Deliberately killing children is one of the few standards Viserys has, considering this ritual require you to murder an unborn child, I doubt we would ever use it.

Not saying Viserys wont kill children in battle, or give orders that might result in their death, just saying that deliberately killing an innocent child, is not something I see him doing.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I'm pretty sure you completely misunderstood my post.
Duesal said:
Don't the Old Gods have their own version of this? That ritual curse that Theon the Hungry cast on the invading Andals to destroy their people? Couldn't that be narrowed down to a specific bloodline if desired?

Just because we don't have an immediate use for it doesn't mean we won't benefit from having the lore. The more knowledge we have the greater a foundation we have to build on for other things.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
This is purely for the sake of acquiring lore, not for using it. Lore, no matter how vile, is useful. This is why even the freaking Archons hang on to whatever fiendish lore they find.
 
Duesal said:
I'm pretty sure you completely misunderstood my post.

This is purely for the sake of acquiring lore, not for using it. Lore, no matter how vile, is useful. This is why even the freaking Archons hang on to whatever fiendish lore they find.

Also on the note of killing children, I point you to Aegon Blackfyre.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Ok that I can agree with, if nothing else, having the lore, should make it easier to break the curse, which depending on how the ritual might work, as such a ritual, might very well have provisions against just resurrecting the ones killed by it.

And Aegon wasn't really a child in mind anymore, and he certainly wasn't innocent, killing an eight year old who serve an evil god and is an 8th circle caster, is different from killing an infant, that hasn't yet said their first word.
 
Last edited:
Goldfish said:
Viserys: "Yeah, she's an angel. I hired her right out from under the Seven. They're shitty bosses."

:p
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
It would be funny if our recruitment (read: poaching) practices resulted in the various gods and powers offering more competitive terms of service so that we don't keep tempting away their servants like the boy their parents warned them about.

I now have the absurd mental image of Viserys rocking up to the gates of Nessus on Balerion wearing a leather jacket and sunglasses and flying away with a Pit Fiend in the saddle with him as Asmodeus looks on like an angry dad.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so I did some math. Andrew Dayne is older than 33 right now. This is the conclusion that came to me after looking at the wiki and the ages of Ser Arthur and his supposed birthday before or during the year of 260. Andrew is the eldest and has, by this point, a son with his wife. This means that this man slept with a 17-year-old...and has been trying to get her accused of a crime. Do we need him alive?
 
One Autumn Leaf said:
Okay, so I did some math. Andrew Dayne is older than 33 right now. This is the conclusion that came to me after looking at the wiki and the ages of Ser Arthur and his supposed birthday before or during the year of 260. Andrew is the eldest and has, by this point, a son with his wife. This means that this man slept with a 17-year-old...and has been trying to get her accused of a crime. Do we need him alive?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
It's too late to plot murder right now. Though it will be fun to see him explain this mess.
 
Here's some more potential Dauntless pictures:






Any stand out to ya'll? Anyone have the links to previous proposed pictures?
 
One Autumn Leaf said:
Okay, so I did some math. Andrew Dayne is older than 33 right now. This is the conclusion that came to me after looking at the wiki and the ages of Ser Arthur and his supposed birthday before or during the year of 260. Andrew is the eldest and has, by this point, a son with his wife. This means that this man slept with a 17-year-old...and has been trying to get her accused of a crime. Do we need him alive?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Andrew: "She threw her vagina at me!"

Viserys: :facepalm:

Oberyn: "That happens to me all the damned time."

Tyene: :jackiechan:
 
One Autumn Leaf said:
Okay, so I did some math. Andrew Dayne is older than 33 right now. This is the conclusion that came to me after looking at the wiki and the ages of Ser Arthur and his supposed birthday before or during the year of 260. Andrew is the eldest and has, by this point, a son with his wife. This means that this man slept with a 17-year-old...and has been trying to get her accused of a crime. Do we need him alive?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Humanity's malice and stupidity has never ceases to amaze me...
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top