Remove ads

A Sword Without a Hilt: A Song of Ice and Fire/D&D 3.5 Crossover

Reader mode
Snowfire said:
Directly after your vote for Azel's vote. Might have gotten lost in the Adventurer's Guild posting, but I'll be the first to admit that I'm not entirely rational right now.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Then please stop posting in the thread until you calm down.
TalonofAnathrax said:
I understood the vote as "give Daenerys a weirdo with a sword tasked with following her around constantly", which doesn't sound like a great present for a family member who's always made a big deal of her independence, freedom and "not being coddled".
Apparently I misunderstood, and Sandor will instead be "on call" for her whenever needed. Why not?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Okay.
 
Glass gardens and stones, guys.

It's really just a good thing I'm too fucking tired to be angry. Working forty hours a week in a cubicle isn't conducive towards venting sheer disgust.

Which is probably why when I have a minor disagreement with someone they get the full 100 percent I have leashed around my fucking neck like a vice out of seemingly nowhere.
 
LonelyWolf999 said:
Posted something, reread it, realized it sounded worse than what I intended, but apparently that twenty seconds makes all the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

This is why I try not to reply to you anymore when we clash over something past saying "yeah, okay" or "I disagree". Intellectually I know you're not trying to get a rise out of me, you just... don't proofread enough.
 
To change the subject for a moment (or for the rest of the evening), if a Summon Monster spell was prepared with the Invisible Spell Metamagic feat, would the resulting Summoned creatures automatically be Invisible?
 
Goldfish said:
To change the subject for a moment (or for the rest of the evening), if a Summon Monster spell was prepared with the Invisible Spell Metamagic feat, would the resulting Summoned creatures automatically be Invisible?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

...good question.

I want to say no because aren't there metamagic combinations or class features extant that literally allow you to do something like this?

But if those features exist and you're spending a higher spellslot to do something unconventional, I would say at the very least maybe they're invisible for one round after they've been summoned?
 
Crake said:
This is why I try not to reply to you anymore when we clash over something past saying "yeah, okay" or "I disagree". Intellectually I know you're not trying to get a rise out of me, you just... don't proofread enough.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Not really. I just don't couch my words so people don't get their feelings hurt. I changed what I said to Snowfire because it seriously misconstrued what I was actually trying to say, turning 'take a freaking breather if you're so aware of why you're making an ass out of yourself' into 'get out and don't come back.' Those are two different things.

As for you Crake, the reason I'm so terse with you is that I don't care how miserable your job is, I'm not going to tiptoe around your mood swings.
 
Last edited:
LonelyWolf999 said:
Not really. I just don't couch my words so people don't get their feelings hurt. I changed what I said to Snowfire because it seriously misconstrued what I was actually trying to say, turning "take a freaking breather if you're so aware of why you're making an ass out of yourself' into 'get out and don't come back.' Those are two different things.

As for you Crake, the reason I'm so terse with you is that I don't care how miserable your job is, I'm not going to tiptoe around your mood swings.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

You're kind of more than terse at times, actually, you're antagonistic.
 
LonelyWolf999 said:
Not really. I just don't couch my words so people don't get their feelings hurt. I changed what I said to Snowfire because it seriously misconstrued what I was actually trying to say, turning 'take a freaking breather if you're so aware of why you're making an ass out of yourself' into 'get out and don't come back.' Those are two different things.

As for you Crake, the reason I'm so terse with you is that I don't care how miserable your job is, I'm not going to tiptoe around your mood swings.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Crake said:
You're kind of more than terse at times, actually, you're antagonistic.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Can both of ya'll simply choose not to have another argument? It would be much appreciated right now.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top