Ah, so they aren't immortal or anything?
Actually, on the subject, what is the physiology of the Children?
Like, how do they age, reproduce, how long does it take for them to grow "of age", and so on?
We might as well ask while we're here, so long as we can phrase it in a way that isn't creepy of course
It's been a while, but in the early days of the quest, we always called Bloodraven our Greatest-uncle.And now we have a new tag. Two of them, actually, but only one is relevant to your post.
Ah, so they probably live around 300-400 years, if they die of old age with a natural lifespan?No they are not immortal. For instance Speaker-to-Men, or Leaf to use the name Bran gave her in canon, is entering late middle age at roughly two hundred.
It's been a while, but in the early days of the quest, we always called Bloodraven our Greatest-uncle.
@Duesal mayhaps we should ask him for what he personally needs? Little, (or not so much) things, to make his existence in this state he's in now, a bit better?
Though there's more narrative sense to do so just before leaving...
No they are not immortal. For instance Speaker-to-Men, or Leaf to use the name Bran gave her in canon, is entering late middle age at roughly two hundred.
Hm. A thought- bloodravens has been up here all alone for what, 500+ years? Hes probably touch starved as hell. We may very well make him cry with a hug. I like the sound of this.
They would probably actually prefer that, to asking for them to give us an answer next week.Also, with the giants, we were told they take forever to make decisions. Dropping by to give them an alternative offer to trying to negotiate their way through the wall and saying we'll return in a year to hear their answer is probably reasonable.
He's only been on the Weirwood bidet for a half a century or so.
Try 60, he was Lord Commander of the Night's watch before Qorgyle. The one Jeor Mormont succeeded.
It's been a while, but in the early days of the quest, we always called Bloodraven our Greatest-uncle.
Just realized something, Ser Richard is level 13 and on the front page it mentions that Oberyn is level 9 and and in the books he fought on even terms with Gregor Clegane, does this mean that Richard is higher leveled then The Mountain?
Assuming that the Mountain hasn't leveled up a ton as well.Just realized something, Ser Richard is level 13 and on the front page it mentions that Oberyn is level 9 and and in the books he fought on even terms with Gregor Clegane, does this mean that Richard is higher leveled then The Mountain?
Well, it's a few years before canon yet. Oberyn/Mountain probably made 11th, as that's one of the big milestones for melee with third iterative. But probably.Just realized something, Ser Richard is level 13 and on the front page it mentions that Oberyn is level 9 and and in the books he fought on even terms with Gregor Clegane, does this mean that Richard is higher leveled then The Mountain?
Just realized something, Ser Richard is level 13 and on the front page it mentions that Oberyn is level 9 and and in the books he fought on even terms with Gregor Clegane, does this mean that Richard is higher leveled then The Mountain?
Assuming that the Mountain hasn't leveled up a ton as well.
Considering he works for the Lannisters, who got their hands on a bunch of magic goodies and have likely been fighting relatively high level things to get those goodies, I wouldn't be surprised if Gregor was a higher level than he would be in canon.
Of course, there's also no reason to let him fight those battles on his own...The Mountain likely has gained magic items, alchemical cocktails, and has been fighting monsters for the Lannisters, so I wouldn't be 100% about it...
But Ser Richard is likely rivaling most of the best and brightest knights from the entire History of the Seven Kingdom in pure skill at this point, and then you add in all the magical gear he has...