Well eventually we'll need to make our own types, so, here are some candidates:
Probably be better to not force ourselves into making 100% organic ships. Because even in the 40k setting, organic equivalents (Tyranid bioships) don't always do things as well as 'conventional' systems.
...Was already worried before this, but now I'm really worried about the lack of experience our "warriors" have. They have won this far through advanced biotech boosted further by goddess-mojo, momentum and sheer aggression that left the enemy on the backfoot. And now that we have to worry not only about converting/conquering the whole planet, but we have the Nightbringer (or a large shard of him) gunning for us. That is not good, obviously.Yeah, as you saw--the very instant your Flower Knights ran into actual weapons, they started getting a bit more skittish. Flayers have a hard time against heavy armor units, and a worse time against regenerators. Actual Necrons that retain enough presence of mind to use guns are a genuine threat that were run over from a combination of built up momentum and the fact they weren't aware of the strength of your regeneration.
Even though on paper, they're comparable to a Space Marine, in practice, a squad of Space Marines will crush a squad of Belladonnas nine times out of ten, that experience gap is real.
Which isn't to say having a unit of Space Marine equivalent heavy infantry is bad of course. But it's working because you're fighting the ideal foe early on. Something actually equipped and trained to fight them is going to push back pretty good.
Where's the pretty flower patterns? The sort of thing you would see in scene changes from That 70s Show.Well eventually we'll need to make our own types, so, here are some candidates:
Yes, Unfallen from Endless Space 2, but it's SOOOO close to our theme
I think this is sort of like conflict of interest in a court case; looking like you have one is just as bad as actually having one for many purposes. Any relatively quick shift in behavioral baseline is going to make people uncomfortable, and in this socia context conflate it to Papa Nurgle's cheerful nihilism.I... doubt the Enlightenment doctrine will have such a downside, especially since it isn't very clearly stated to be a negative or creepy spread of happiness. The Doctrines that we pick seem to be purely beneficial, hence why we rushed the book to pick them, both to get more input and to block out doctrines that could have downsides.
The 'spread' of optimism most likely works through standard human phycology, no cult shenanigans or suspicious behaviour involved. A good example of this is how seeing someone genuinely smiling sets of chemicals the brain that raise general happiness and guard against depression. A group of friendly individuals moving into or through a community ususally causes an uptick in overall community happiness simply due to how humans 'ping' off each others moods.
While there is definitely an element of truth to this, it's still a better look to outsiders than openly preaching the benefits of messing around with genetics. To use your own example, imagine if the openly practising satanists started exalting the virtues of genetic manipulation and talking about their plans to grow super-crops and enhance themselves.I think this is sort of like conflict of interest in a court case; looking like you have one is just as bad as actually having one for many purposes. Any relatively quick shift in behavioral baseline is going to make people uncomfortable, and in this socia context conflate it to Papa Nurgle's cheerful nihilism.
It doesn't take much to get this kind of effect, even if you don't have social conditioning to fight against.
Pick one of your coworkers, someone you see on a regular basis but don't really know well. Suppose you start seeing them show up to the office constantly chipper, even when they wouldn't otherwise have been. They whistle while they work, make friendly conversation with strangers, and generally act oddly upbeat all the time.
When you get around to asking them about it they attribute it all to a new religion they joined, one that's growing popular in your area. The more people you encounter who go there, the more uniform this upbeat trend is, no matter who you're talking to or what their life is like. Wouldn't that weird you out at least a little if that's all you had to go on about this hypothetical group?
Now imagine that happening in a small town in the Bible Belt with a group of openly practicing Satanists. What's actually going on doesn't matter, just that you're giving people an excuse to see what they already believe to be true.
In this particular case, assuming the warp cult is brainwashed is even the rational position given all prior experience, so it's not even unreasonable for them to reach that conclusion. We need to be all but unimpeachable until people have had more personal experience with VM.
edit:To be clear, this isn't a comment on religious belief in general. I'm specifically referring to sudden changes in personality that appear to be uniform across a group. That's one of those things you see when people join a cult in real life. Maybe it's because the pastor equivalent is a genuinely good person who also happens to be a hyper competent therapist or something, but that's not the first thing people are going to assume.
Openly preaching about life sculpting would be bad, but we can control that more easily than we can the way VM's followers comport themselves. Moreover, now is probably the best time to have that debate since GMOs directly created by a warp god are the only reason anyone is still eating. Humans doing it is easier to swallow in comparison.While there is definitely an element of truth to this, it's still a better look to outsiders than openly preaching the benefits of messing around with genetics. To use your own example, imagine if the openly practising satanists started exalting the virtues of genetic manipulation and talking about their plans to grow super-crops and enhance themselves.
Controlling and hiding the information just makes it look even worse when it inevitably gets out (secrecy is really not our strong spot), and I'd actually say that gods messing around with life is easier to swallow than humans doing it. After all, gods and spirits are expected to do weird and unnatural things with nature, while humans generally aren't; that's probably part of the reason the knowledge and technique for it are largely a lost art.Openly preaching about life sculpting would be bad, but we can control that more easily than we can the way VM's followers comport themselves. Moreover, now is probably the best time to have that debate since GMOs directly created by a warp god are the only reason anyone is still eating. Humans doing it is easier to swallow in comparison.
Openly preaching about life sculpting would be bad, but we can control that more easily than we can the way VM's followers comport themselves. Moreover, now is probably the best time to have that debate since GMOs directly created by a warp god are the only reason anyone is still eating. Humans doing it is easier to swallow in comparison.
That's hardly surprising considering we literally just pulled in a bunch of random girls and threw them into combat. Ideally, by the time we're crossing blades with the Astartes, the troops will have a bit more of an idea what they're doing. On a positive note, they performed remarkably well despite being a bunch of random girls thrust into plant-mechas, with the sense sharing and regeneration making it remarkably difficult to take them out of the fight.Yeah, as you saw--the very instant your Flower Knights ran into actual weapons, they started getting a bit more skittish. Flayers have a hard time against heavy armor units, and a worse time against regenerators. Actual Necrons that retain enough presence of mind to use guns are a genuine threat that were run over from a combination of built up momentum and the fact they weren't aware of the strength of your regeneration.
Even though on paper, they're comparable to a Space Marine, in practice, a squad of Space Marines will crush a squad of Belladonnas nine times out of ten, that experience gap is real.
Which isn't to say having a unit of Space Marine equivalent heavy infantry is bad of course. But it's working because you're fighting the ideal foe early on. Something actually equipped and trained to fight them is going to push back pretty good.
Controlling and hiding the information just makes it look even worse when it inevitably gets out (secrecy is really not our strong spot), and I'd actually say that gods messing around with life is easier to swallow than humans doing it. After all, gods and spirits are expected to do weird and unnatural things with nature, while humans generally aren't; that's probably part of the reason the knowledge and technique for it are largely a lost art.
I'm at least for openly preaching about life-weaving. Our religion is not a mystery cult, so hiding that sort of knowledge when we already are heretics in the eyes of the Imperium doesn't make much sense, like you are saying.So... your saying we should make life sculpting one of the core doctrines of our faith, on part with the possibility of forgiveness and redemption in christianity, but not preach about it?
How?
Eh... in terms of raw capabilities our knights probably equal or exceed those (considering how well they mulched necrons), but when it comes to skill they're a long way away from getting close to either of those groups.
Name | Movement | Weapon Skill | Ballistic Skill | Strength | Toughness | Wounds | Attacks | Leadership | Saves |
Flower Knight | 8"? (A horse is 10") | 6+ | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3+ | |
Flower Knight Exemplar? | 8" | 6+ | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3+ |
Weapon | Range | Type | Strength | Armor Penetration | Damage | Abilities |
Ironbark Lance | Melee | Melee | +2 | -2 | 1d3 | A model may only attack with this weapon on a turn in which it has charged. |
Twin Reaper Sickles | Melee | Melee | User | -1? | 1 | Viridian Energy, Each time the bearer fights, it can make 1 additional attack with this weapon |
I meant more along the lines if not shouting about it in the streets or allowing unorganized efforts to preach. We can control the debate on that topic more easily because it's a topic you can have a debate on and not a knee jerk reaction to something that is usually the last warning sign you get before someone initiates a purge.So... your saying we should make life sculpting one of the core doctrines of our faith, on part with the possibility of forgiveness and redemption in christianity, but not preach about it?
How?