Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting will open in 1 day, 19 hours
I think Panoramia is much of a fighter. I mean, she wasn't really anything but confident when she joined the Expedition and she killed a bunch of enemies while on it with her magic.

Do keep in mind that while that may be true, this is Johann talking. I tried to make it subtle, and maybe succeeded too well, but one of the themes I was working with for this omake was that people are fallible. They can be mistaken and wrong. It's most obvious in how Egrimm assumes Mathilde manipulated the Grandmaster of Taal's Fury to divert the two wings of knight's to aid the expedition and the rest of his assumptions, but it's also in how Max talks himself up, saying things that aren't wrong but not necessarily the whole truth to make himself sound better. Bias is a factor. Yes, we know that Panoramia is a strong wizard who helped fight a number of times through the Reclamation of K8P, but her contributions weren't always the most notable or noticeable, especially with the one time she literally hid herself away to cast subtle magic to help. Add in how after the initial phases of the reclamation finished she really didn't take on an active part in the fighting and it's an easy assumption on Johann's part to see Pan as someone who really didn't take to the martial aspects of wizardry and decided to focus on being...well a magic farmer.
 
I'm certainly interested in seeing more of Mathilde's commander aspect, even if it means less personal infiltration and action. Therefore:

[x] Lead the Wizards, Knightly Orders, and Asarnil
 
I don't know if there's anything objectively wrong with this sentence but it flows weirdly to me with two "as"'s so close together with only one word between them. Maybe "and equally as interesting"?

I understand what you mean, but I'm going to stand by what I wrote. It looks odds and even sounds odd, but I don't really think it's that much of an issue. Both the intent and meaning is clear, and looking back at it, it's one of those little quirks of language that a person would make. It might not pass a strict grammar check, but one of my goals in writing is trying to make the characters feel real and somebody thinking a not totally grammatically correct sounding thought lines up with my intent, even if it was on accident.
 
I understand what you mean, but I'm going to stand by what I wrote. It looks odds and even sounds odd, but I don't really think it's that much of an issue. Both the intent and meaning is clear, and looking back at it, it's one of those little quirks of language that a person would make. It might not pass a strict grammar check, but one of my goals in writing is trying to make the characters feel real and somebody thinking a not totally grammatically correct sounding thought lines up with my intent, even if it was on accident.
Fair enough, the standard of grammar we apply to written communication isn't the same as what we apply to spoken words or internal monologues. TV Tropes even has a page about it.
 
It has probably been remarked on before. But I find it amusing that, for all Mathilde doesn't believe in Sigmar, Sigmar in all likelyhood believes in Mathilde.

All of the stuff she's gotten up to since she became an anti-sigmarite is stuff he would broadly approve of. Especially the part where she helped dawi.
 
It has probably been remarked on before. But I find it amusing that, for all Mathilde doesn't believe in Sigmar, Sigmar in all likelyhood believes in Mathilde.

All of the stuff she's gotten up to since she became an anti-sigmarite is stuff he would broadly approve of. Especially the part where she helped dawi.
I expect that most people think that we are an especially devote sigmarite.
 
How do you think Mathilde would react if she was blessed by Sigmar like Freddy?
If it were compatible with her soul's nature as a Wizard, I think she'd accept and use it, she hates Sigmar but she's also very practical, she's not going to spurn a useful tool because of it's origin unless it's tainted by dhar or Chaos. Biggest problem would be that it might be in conflict with our relationship with Ranald, he might be okay with it as a temporary thing during a crisis but we seem to be in an implicit monogamous spiritual relationship with him, he might disapprove if we start accepting other gods blessings.
 
She has spent almost every waking moment since Abelhelm died acting steadfastly in defense of the Empire and the Dawi. Fighting tirelessly against undead, "beastmen", and greenskins.

Hell, Starke seems to think we're a sigmarite, which is amusing.
Also consider that people with good mage sight can likely sense a touch of divine on us from the coin.
 
I'm a little late to respond to the flow of discussion, but I don't think 'being more involved in Imperial Poltics' and 'Serving King Belegar at K8P' are mutually exclusive. Belegar favors humans strongly for a dawi king. A lot of the redevelopment of his Karak will depend on good will from the Empire. Having Mathilde sit around the Karak sneaking in the tunnels is a waste for him; she has his trust and is a major figure in the Empire. Being a Lady Magister puts her in the top 100 imperial officials serving the emperor easily.

So he provides a stable base, wealth and manpower to build up her research, and she's his woman on the inside of the Empire. Furthermore, his interest aren't at cross purposes with the Empire to begin with, so these aren't a crippling divide of her loyalty.
 
@Zedman7054 I greatly enjoyed your omake's concept! Uncertainty, ambiguity and double-meanings are very fun to play around with. That said, I have compiled a list of potential corrections/suggestions (in red and yellow) that may improve the grammar and/or flow. Feel free to use or ignore them as you please.

With the eminent arrival of the Dwarven 'steam-wagon' convoy,
Eminent means something respected and well known. While it is valid to use eminent there, you may have meant to use imminent, which is something about to happen or close at hand.

A pair of Ambers accompanying two wings of Knight's of Taal's Fury, Demigryphs included
Plural 's' doesn't need apostrophes. "Knights" or "the Knights" both work.

What grabs your attention however is how the Lady Magister Mathilde interacts with them.
"However" joins two separate clauses, so there should be commas before and after it. I'm not 100% on this one, but it feels odd not to have the pauses there.

Gone is the constant suspicious glares leveled at everyone, gone is the all-knowing confidence,
"Glares" is plural but "is" is singular. Since they're linked, they should be both one or the other. You can use "Gone are the constant suspicious glares" for plural or "Gone is the constant suspicious glaring/gaze" for singular.

Chat, not interrogate like she did to you or the Journeymen who arrived here on their own volition.
Probably fine? You seem to be using "chat" and "interrogate" as nouns(since they are the subject of the sentence) instead of verbs, so the participle form may be better here. E.g "chatting" and "interrogating"

Apparently he had clamed up and become terse, refusing to answer.
Two ms in "clammed."

And with that, you return to your Inn room. Casting a small cantrip to give you enough light to see by, you sit on your bed, mind a whirl. Now you feel like you have a good place to start in figuring out Lady Magister Matilde Weber.
Inn should be uncapitalized unless it's part of the inn's name. Mathilde has an h.
 
Two ms in "clammed."

Aha! I already beat you to that one!

"However" joins two separate clauses, so there should be commas before and after it. I'm not 100% on this one, but it feels odd not to have the pauses there.

I...want to say I'm not using it for that purpose, and that this is another way to use it, but I don't know how to put it into words.

That's annoying, the one place I messed that up.

Everything else has been looked at and edited to my whims. Thank you for advice.
 
Voting will open in 1 day, 19 hours
Back
Top