Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting will open in 10 hours, 10 minutes
[X] Bringer of Night
[X] Nightbringer

I like it. Pays homage to the Dusk Rider this spell is based on and contains a pun but not in a groan-inducing sort of way. I prefer 'Nightbringer', I feel like that fits the tenor of Dusk-Rider and Shadow-steed better, but that's quibbling, both are fine.

(Nightbringer is entirely distinct from Knightbringer, which is bad and wrong and illegal. It's like calling RoW 'Right of Way' - you can't make the official name the pun, that's backwards)
 
How about a nice simple 'guardian rider'? Or 'shadow knight'? The self aggrandizement gets to be a bit much sometimes.
I can think its actually in character for Mathilde to want to name stuff after herself. this is from my point of view but Mathilde seems to have a need to be remembered, to leave a legacy that future people will go she made/did that.

the problem is that as a shadow wizard being remembered is sort of against the point (outside of actions causing fear), so she rebels in her own way by leaving her name everywhere she can.

[X] The Dusk Rider
 
Last edited:
[X] Mathilde's Magnificent Mauler
[X] Weber's Emergency Battler
Some more zest into those votes please.

[X] Rote Warden
[X] Dämmerlichtreiter
But i guess these are fine.

edit-
[X] Mathilde's Autonomous Tactical Horsebound Intangible Lethal Deterrent Evocation
Oh yes, this is what i was looking for.
 
Last edited:
[X] Dämmerlichtreiter
[X] Knightbringer


Edit:
Knightbringer Is a fine name too...
 
Last edited:
@Boney thank you for the endlessly entertaining updates. I found this one very entertaining. Couldn't help but chuckle at Mathilde's Orc impression and her urge to Wizardsplain when Hubert wasn't specific enough in regards to her experimentation.

I always love the worldbuilding you put into every facet of the story when we interact with the magic of the setting. It's so fascinating and entertaining that I continue to desire to push further with our experiments. Who knew Daemonology would be so fun?

I jest. I'm into Daemonology only insofar as it doesn't involve the Chaos Gods. I know we probably aren't going to end up working with more Apparitions, even if some might be willing to work with Handmaidens. We already got what we wanted out of Apparitions, and it'll take a lot of convincing to push the boundaries further when we have so many other things to do.
 
You had, of course, examined every inch of it for the slightest hint of Chaotic energies and found not a trace of it, but you suppose it makes sense that there'd be portions of the Aethyr that resonate with the concepts of Chaos without directly being touched and tainted by the energies of Chaos. Those beings have too much size and power and presence for Them to not cause ripples that extend far beyond the borders of Their domains.
Also worth keeping in mind that they are users, not creators. Effects, not causes.
Just because they utilise aspects of the Aethyr doesn't mean they have a monopoly on those aspects.

[X] Dämmerlichtreiter
For the branding.

[X] Knightbringer
For the pun.

So, it turned out to be a happy coincidence that the Red Rider is actually extremely well conceptually suited to being a bodyguard, huh. Neat!
Set a thief to catch a thief.
Set an embodiment of 'attacking a wizard' to stop people attacking your wizard.

Not sure the tally system will recognise that.
 
I jest. I'm into Daemonology only insofar as it doesn't involve the Chaos Gods. I know we probably aren't going to end up working with more Apparitions, even if some might be willing to work with Handmaidens. We already got what we wanted out of Apparitions, and it'll take a lot of convincing to push the boundaries further when we have so many other things to do.

Well, the Whispering Darkness might be a shortcut to getting that Battlemagic Cloud of Death spell some of us have been theorising about, but yeah, I don't see us picking up another one soon, if only because we have a lot of other stuff we want to do first.
 
Well, the Whispering Darkness might be a shortcut to getting that Battlemagic Cloud of Death spell some of us have been theorising about, but yeah, I don't see us picking up another one soon, if only because we have a lot of other stuff we want to do first.
There's also a small part of me, not that big, that's somewhat worried about what our higherups might think if we keep finagling with Apparitions. Sure they're not exactly Daemons, but there's a reason the Gold Order were worried about people finding out what they're doing. Considering how many worrying things Mathilde has worked on, and her recent entangling with a Lord of Change, there is a part of me that worries if we do a lot of work on Apparitions, Algard might keep an even closer eye on us.

It's still not a huge concern for me, but it is a thought.
 
There's also a small part of me, not that big, that's somewhat worried about what our higherups might think if we keep finagling with Apparitions. Sure they're not exactly Daemons, but there's a reason the Gold Order were worried about people finding out what they're doing. Considering how many worrying things Mathilde has worked on, and her recent entangling with a Lord of Change, there is a part of me that worries if we do a lot of work on Apparitions, Algard might keep an even closer eye on us.

It's still not a huge concern for me, but it is a thought.

The thing is... what is he going to keep an eye on us with? We live in a dwarf Karak at the edge of the known world and in the hidden forest of elves barely coming out of isolationism, in addition to all that issues that come with spying on a Lady Magister. At Mathilde's level of power and influence you either extend full trust or you kill her. There is no way to control or effectively spy on her.
 
There's also a small part of me, not that big, that's somewhat worried about what our higherups might think if we keep finagling with Apparitions. Sure they're not exactly Daemons, but there's a reason the Gold Order were worried about people finding out what they're doing. Considering how many worrying things Mathilde has worked on, and her recent entangling with a Lord of Change, there is a part of me that worries if we do a lot of work on Apparitions, Algard might keep an even closer eye on us.

It's still not a huge concern for me, but it is a thought.

That is a fair thing to be worried about, especially with the lengths we've gone to to hide our extensive knowledge of Dhar and Necromancy. The Demonology thing is another thing to be cautious about, especially since we plan on making it public.

However, we do have 20 years of loyal and exemplary service to the Empire and their allies in our back pocket, and it'll take a lot of work to erode that trust we've earned. Still, no point squandering that trust now whilst we're in the middle of a diplomatically tricky project that's built mostly upon our reputation and not much else, so it's probably better overall to be cautious rather than incautious when dealing with Dark-adjacent magics.
 
The thing is... what is he going to keep an eye on us with? We live in a dwarf Karak at the edge of the known world and in the hidden forest of elves barely coming out of isolationism, in addition to all that issues that come with spying on a Lady Magister. At Mathilde's level of power and influence you either extend full trust or you kill her. There is no way to control or effectively spy on her.
Eye doesn't mean constant surveillance. It just means extra paranoia when he sees all the stuff we've cooked up. It's not a serious concern of mine, but I will say that "full trust" does not exist in the Grey Order. If we used the Coin to trick someone from the Grey Order into being one hundred percent certain that we've said is the truth, that in itself would cause an immovable object to collide into an unstoppable force. That gives me the impression that full trust isn't a thing.
 
Voting will open in 10 hours, 10 minutes
Back
Top