- Pronouns
- Zack
The game master said if it is in this turn or the next that we have to do a diplomacy action with the Thalya?
The game master said if it is in this turn or the next that we have to do a diplomacy action with the Thalya?
I'm concerned that Thalya would smell a rat if the extremely reclusive Explorator suddenly starts asking her about local politics.That could be what we do on our Mechanicus diplomacy action: try and figure out the internal politics and how we can set them against each other.
The problem is that someone started deleting themWe're kind of already sowing the first seeds of - if not outright sedition, then atleast dissent amongst select groups of Mechanicus personnel by leaving those little puzzles and free samples of knowledge, given enough time and a big enough carrot, I forsee there being some instibilities that we can exploit.
Next turn.
Then we don't ask her, we do some hacking around the databases and noosphereI'm concerned that Thalya would smell a rat if the extremely reclusive Explorator suddenly starts asking her about local politics.
Or enemy void BP to ground BP! It's a multidirectional conversion platform.Using the fighters to convert enemy ground BP to void BP, I see...
The ability to scale your industry is pretty much what you earned from doing the Aevon diplomacy, and you do need to do it at some point.Anyway, while Meianmaru's plan is decent-ish, I feel like it'd get kind of boring to spend several turns just smashing the Construction Button and only maybe one thing that isn't Construction Button.
I think there's still some confusion around this. Basically, every other turn Thalya wants a report. I will allow you to do that as a free action but then you have no chance to improve things and a higher chance of everything getting worse. Basically roll a die and anything worse than 35 is very bad, anything better maintains status quo.As mentioned, that's a mandatory Mechanicus diplomacy action every other turn. We don't need to dedicate a whole action to write a fake report.
Fair enough, although I'd prefer to dig into Thalya first. We'll be interacting with her a lot, and our files on her are incomplete.Then we don't ask her, we do some hacking around the databases and noosphere
I'd recommend that we take the action next turn with the aim of improving relations. No matter what route we take with the Mechanicus, it should become significantly easier if our main Mechanicus point of contact mistrusts us less.I think there's still some confusion around this. Basically, every other turn Thalya wants a report. I will allow you to do that as a free action but then you have no chance to improve things and a higher chance of everything getting worse. Basically roll a die and anything worse than 35 is very bad, anything better maintains status quo.
If you spend an action on it then you can combine it with other attempts at diplomacy/subversion/infiltration as you like, and have the chance to improve relations.
We either do that, or build up enough of an army so we can just bum rush the Enclaves and get cloaked shuttles of Heavy Robots inside before they even have the time to react with nukes.We could also try penetrating deep enough into the mechanicus to outright sabotage their WMDs and facilities. It would be difficult and risky and take a long time, but it's a possible option we can consider.
It's not a strong preference - just a comment that it's a lot to write. There's a good chance that next turn you'll want to do another Anexa action + a mechanicus action, and that would be fine.Ah, so you'd rather us keep it to one Diplo a turn? Fair enough!
We either do that, or build up enough of an army so we can just bum rush the Enclaves and get cloaked shuttles of Heavy Robots inside before they even have the time to react with nukes.
Some ideas have already been thrown out. I'll plug mine if you don't mind shameless self-promotion:
"And what is the Omnissiah, girl? The body of Machine God in the physical world? A being wielding the power of Machine God? The Machine God itself? A name given to supposed concept of omniscience? You'd be surprised how many important projects got nowhere because leading Magi disagreed on dogma. But I digress.
I believe that there is Truth. The fact, the measurable existence and laws that govern it. I believe that Quest of Knowledge is how we uncover the Truth. But we experience existence through senses, which are fallible, and thus we sometimes find incorrect or incomplete information. But if you observe something enough times and compare your observations, you will find patterns. And if you compare enough patterns, you may find some of those underlying laws. You may find part of the Truth.
I don't particularly care about the place of my philosophy within the greater theology. Like I said, many Magi hold incompatible opinion on the nature of Omnissiah. What matters is the knowledge. The Truth, or however you want to call it. Because it is measurable fact, the same in all existence. Mass attracts mass. Hydrogen is less dense than helium. Two plus two equals four. This is another lesson: information you believe in and information you act on need not always be the same. I share this with you as a reward for your discoveries"
Some ideas have already been thrown out. I'll plug mine if you don't mind shameless self-promotion:
"And what is the Omnissiah, girl? The body of Machine God in the physical world? A being wielding the power of Machine God? The Machine God itself? A name given to the supposed concept of omniscience? You'd be surprised how many important projects got nowhere because the leading Magi disagreed on dogma. But I digress.
I believe that there is Truth. The fact, the measurable existence and laws that govern it. I believe that the Quest of Knowledge is how we uncover the Truth. But we experience existence through senses, which are fallible, and thus we sometimes find incorrect or incomplete information. But if you observe something enough times and compare your observations, you will find patterns. And if you compare enough patterns, you may find some of those underlying laws. You may find part of the Truth.
I don't particularly care about the place of my philosophy within the greater theology. As I said, many Magi hold incompatible opinions on the nature of Omnissiah. What matters is the knowledge. The Truth, or however you want to call it. Because it is a measurable fact, the same in all existence. Mass attracts mass. Hydrogen is less dense than helium. Two plus two equals four. This is another lesson: information you believe in and information you act on need not always be the same.
If you seek to know what is the Truth of the Omnissiah, or if the Omnissiah is a part of the Truth at all, you will inevitably and quickly run into the issue that so much of what is believed and said and thought about the Omnissiah is, with our current tools, technologies, skills and Knowledge, is simply unfalsifiable.
That doesn't inherently make any or even all interpretations of the Omnissiah Untrue or indeed, not part of the Truth. But until we can measure the Omnissiah, test the Omnissiah, until we can fail to disprove the nature of the Omnissiah, we cannot know the Truth of the Omnissiah. I do not put my faith in blind beliefs and unprovable dogmas, but in Truth, and so I cannot hold faith in the Omnissiah until I Know this Truth.
Perhaps, if you are willing, we can seek this Truth together, for the good of all Mechanicus and Humanity. For only in Truth will we find the Knowledge and tools to fight and push back against the dark, and bring back to the Galaxy the light the Ancestors knew once again.
All this, I share this with you as a reward for your discoveries, and for daring to be curious. And if you still wish to join me in my sojourn for Truth, together we can both learn so much more."
A variation of the nuclear option might be some kind of high yield EMP. It would be less destructive by far, if also less of a guarantee.
Anyway, here is the actual plan:
Wait for the QM to ask it.Also, a roll with Diplomacy is definitely going to happen. Should I do it now or wait until the vote is over?