Voting is open
[x][IDEALS] Socialist: Having come to refer to a specific political movement rather than an entire branch of ideology, modern socialism is focused on giving the state the power to care for allcitizens, and claims that the modern Social Democrat platform does not go far enough in pursuit of this. It also calls for a massive investment into healthcare in order to revitalize the field and make sure that there are enough medical professionals to go around (long-term, they want free healthcare, but there needs to be enough
of it first). They also grant unions extensive privileges over private employers. They are fervently in favor of democratized workplaces, and openly campaign in favor of granting them special concessions.

[x][CRUSH] The founding ideology forms a political party, and membership is mandatory for government service. Foundational law is a manifesto of the party's aims.

[x][POWER] You are a centralized unitary state with no subordinate governments.

[x][TEXT] The old Constitution had its flaws, but it was a document of many strengths as well. It lasted

two and a half centuries. We shall honor that and preserve the original. Our changes will be amendments, as intended, with our population approving them as specified in the text.
 
[x][IDEALS] Socialist: Having come to refer to a specific political movement rather than an entire branch of ideology, modern socialism is focused on giving the state the power to care for allcitizens, and claims that the modern Social Democrat platform does not go far enough in pursuit of this. It also calls for a massive investment into healthcare in order to revitalize the field and make sure that there are enough medical professionals to go around (long-term, they want free healthcare, but there needs to be enough
of it first). They also grant unions extensive privileges over private employers. They are fervently in favor of democratized workplaces, and openly campaign in favor of granting them special concessions.

[x][CRUSH] The founding ideology forms a political party, and membership is mandatory for government service. Foundational law is a manifesto of the party's aims.

[x][POWER] You are a centralized unitary state with no subordinate governments.

[x][TEXT] The old Constitution had its flaws, but it was a document of many strengths as well. It lasted

two and a half centuries. We shall honor that and preserve the original. Our changes will be amendments, as intended, with our population approving them as specified in the text.
sorry man, vote was called. would have loved to see you earlier though :D
 
Okay! We got our Constitution down. Now, we build up our economy and industry. Make overtures to the palatable American factions. And wait for the Tsar to die...

Then, the Union will retake its place in the world.
 
So, why exactly can't we get tomatoes?

we wouldn't be able to have fresh ones year round (maybe a small number from greenhouses), but we ought to be able to grow plenty in the summer, and preserve quite a store.
 
So, continued reading, and I just read Kraft slaughter Darmouth.

So, we also need to consider University education as well, and education for all.

Now, back to see what other atrocities need to be fixed.
 
Why So Many Havana Residents Grow Their Own Food - CityLab

Havana has a densely populated city center with little green space. Neighborhoods farther from the center, like Marinao or Diez de Octubre, and the rural-feeling outskirts of Havana Province are where Figueroa and Lama have spurred change. Where there is space, small gardens and farms have appeared. This has increased the supply of produce and improved food security, even for those in the denser central areas who don't have space to garden. Farming the outskirts of Havana has resulted in real progress for the entire city, with studies showing that today, almost 90 percent of the produce consumed in Havana province is grown there.
 
100 pages in six days. Holy shit. :D

A tale of socialism, Victoria-bashing and of course pizza.

So, why exactly can't we get tomatoes?

we wouldn't be able to have fresh ones year round (maybe a small number from greenhouses), but we ought to be able to grow plenty in the summer, and preserve quite a store.

It might be possible to grow tomatoes, but in a post-collapse society they're not very feasible for a society living hand to mouth. For the time, effort and care needed to grow a small greenhouse of tomatoes, I'm sure you could grow a small field of potatoes. It's no longer about favour it's about filling people up.
 
A tale of socialism, Victoria-bashing and of course pizza.



It might be possible to grow tomatoes, but in a post-collapse society they're not very feasible for a society living hand to mouth. For the time, effort and care needed to grow a small greenhouse of tomatoes, I'm sure you could grow a small field of potatoes. It's no longer about favour it's about filling people up.

Yeah, tomatoes are something people should be growing in their own/community garden during the summer not something the state can really subsidize like wheat or potatoes or other staple foodstuffs.
 
Local Militias

The smallest unit that can or should be formed by local militias should be roughly equivalent to a platoon - typically 30 to 50 volunteers, with appropriate arms (which should be hopefully standardized on a caliber, if nothing else).

Three to four platoons, from the same general region, should form a company; with the officer commanding being selected from the commanding officers of the platoons. Strength should range from 120-200 militia.

Three to four companies forms a battalion (480-800 militia) and three to four battalions a "column" or "brigade" (2,000 - 3,200 militia).

The local militia's job is to provide a modicum of military experience for most people (i.e. drill one weekend a month, provide upkeep on their weapons, etc), provide local security and policing in the event of war (civil defense and that sort of thing) and to augment the reserves and the regular army in defense, if necessary. They are incorporated into the national command structure and are de facto federalized (with the understanding that, unless in extreme cases or in case of volunteers, they will not generally be required to campaign outside their home region), although they can be called up by and commanded by local authorities in the event of emergencies or natural disasters. Unlike the National Guard, they don't go through any kind of boot-camp, but they are provided basic weapon training and some basic drill (ideally during their monthly training sessions).

The regulars should be called (appropriately enough, I think) the Continental Army, which will be organized along more conventional means. Their size is going to heavily depend on population and our starting situation, but should be mainly volunteers, at least at this point. They answer to our central government and are strictly suborned to civilian control. They are, of course, full-time soldiers.

As an auxiliary to the regulars, there's the National Guard, which are more of a reserve system and are there to provide a more ready pool of mobilizing manpower in the case of war and to help fill out the Continental Army's offensive power. They're not strictly full-time soldiers, but they train more often and have more "range time" than the militia (maybe something similar to OTL/present-day National Guard training, where they go through a basic training and then a period of military training before going to a one weekend a month/two weeks a year thing). It's therefore more of a commitment than the militia, although with therefore more compensation and potentially benefits. Also, ideally, volunteer.

So we have a three-tier mobilization system that gives us some flexibility in how much of our armed power we deploy and should ideally give us a pool of trained man- and woman-power to draw on in the event of a larger conflict.

Rather than a navy, I think we should have a Coast Guard to provide security, border patrol, law enforcement, etc, on Lake Michigan/the rest of the Great Lakes and potentially along the Mississippi. They're sort of a combination of military/LE, like the present day Coast Guard. Or "Coast and River Patrol", maybe.
 
Last edited:
Local Militias

The smallest unit that can or should be formed by local militias should be roughly equivalent to a platoon - typically 30 to 50 volunteers, with appropriate arms (which should be hopefully standardized on a caliber, if nothing else).

Three to four platoons, from the same general region, should form a company; with the officer commanding being selected from the commanding officers of the platoons. Strength should range from 120-200 militia.

Three to four companies forms a battalion (480-800 militia) and three to four battalions a "column" or "brigade" (2,000 - 3,200 militia).

The local militia's job is to provide a modicum of military experience for most people (i.e. drill one weekend a month, provide upkeep on their weapons, etc), provide local security and policing in the event of war (civil defense and that sort of thing) and to augment the reserves and the regular army in defense, if necessary. They are incorporated into the national command structure and are de facto federalized (with the understanding that, unless in extreme cases or in case of volunteers, they will not generally be required to campaign outside their home region), although they can be called up by and commanded by local authorities in the event of emergencies or natural disasters. Unlike the National Guard, they don't go through any kind of boot-camp, but they are provided basic weapon training and some basic drill (ideally during their monthly training sessions).

The regulars should be called (appropriately enough, I think) the Continental Army, which will be organized along more conventional means. Their size is going to heavily depend on population and our starting situation, but should be mainly volunteers, at least at this point. They answer to our central government and are strictly suborned to civilian control. They are, of course, full-time soldiers.

As an auxiliary to the regulars, there's the National Guard, which are more of a reserve system and are there to provide a more ready pool of mobilizing manpower in the case of war and to help fill out the Continental Army's offensive power. They're not strictly full-time soldiers, but they train more often and have more "range time" than the militia (maybe something similar to OTL/present-day National Guard training, where they go through a basic training and then a period of military training before going to a one weekend a month/two weeks a year thing). It's therefore more of a commitment than the militia, although with therefore more compensation and potentially benefits. Also, ideally, volunteer.

So we have a three-tier mobilization system that gives us some flexibility in how much of our armed power we deploy and should ideally give us a pool of trained man- and woman-power to draw on in the event of a larger conflict.

Rather than a navy, I think we should have a Coast Guard to provide security, border patrol, law enforcement, etc, on Lake Michigan/the rest of the Great Lakes and potentially along the Mississippi. They're sort of a combination of military/LE, like the present day Coast Guard.

I like this, though I think maybe the militia should have armories that they share with the National Guard for the storing of heavier weaponry than their personal rifles (machine guns, mortars, etc) that can be used as bases for drill weekends and also some place for full time staff/core of local National Guard units to have their headquarters. Then there's a known central location/local headquarters where National Guard and militia can be quickly assembled and equipped in the case of some kind of emergency call up as well as a location where people can get range time and some experience doing other soldierly duties like guard duty and have classes on military related topics (i.e. orienteering/map reading, basics of camouflage, etc.) for militia members.
 
It might be possible to grow tomatoes, but in a post-collapse society they're not very feasible for a society living hand to mouth. For the time, effort and care needed to grow a small greenhouse of tomatoes, I'm sure you could grow a small field of potatoes. It's no longer about favour it's about filling people up.

Maybe if your a population of homo economicus.

Besides, tomatoes are signifigant sources of vitamins and minerals, they preserve well in a variety of ways, and are a cultural touchstone and staple of home gardens
 
Last edited:
Guess people really want to destroy Lind's mary sue-topia.
I'm doing it because I (Gasp) read the book...

By that I mean, I read the first chapter before I burned it. It wasn't even worth the two dollars I paid for it.

It hurt my soul so much that I am willing to do anything to blow this morons world asunder, and show him what America truly is.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top