And then we get the privilege to crash and burn like they do, but without their honking plot shields.
So the answer to the Sketch flying ahead is to give up? Thanks for playing, try again after the next lightning rounds? We need to keep going forward on each opportunity and leaving our upper house to stagnate is an explicitly bad decision according to the GM himself.
 
Holding the tide against reckless development will end in Nokly being exiled at best, so you know. He will literally have to shut down all government function to do anything to stop that going forward in the long run, which will result in revolt by the nobles if not the nobles and commoners.
Are we to understand that no amount of sensible, prudent, low-pollution development will satisfy the Second Estate?
 
So the answer to the Sketch flying ahead is to give up? Thanks for playing, try again after the next lightning rounds? We need to keep going forward on each opportunity and leaving our upper house to stagnate is an explicitly bad decision according to the GM himself.
What actually bothers people is we apparently can't do our own thing now. We need to do the same as everyone else.
 
Oh, their economy is still on fire, it's just that once they patted out the worst of it they hadn't fallen nearly as far as to be at your level, so they are still better off. And they have far less centralized control, they just do more than you because each faction gets their own slice of control even if they don't necessarily coordinate.

Ugh.

Fucking history, always being about who races to the bottom for efficiency faster.

I can't really say you're wrong though, especially since we're still held back by the existence of our undeveloped hinterland.

EDIT: The problem, basically, is that the Sketch are leading the example. And even though they jumped on a grenade, they were so far ahead of everyone else combined that even being on fire and miserable, they were still better off immediately afterwards, and are pulling ahead again despite still being on fire. Which means that everyone else needs to sink to their level or lose to them.

Effectively, they found a cheat code government style for the era that lets them do everything and ignore the consequences because they can afford to take a year doing nothing at all and still be in the lead in the aftermath when they start moving again, and everyone who doesn't copy them loses. And that's why we're effectively losing self-determination out of it, because our populace in world knows this.

In short, it's the parable of the tortoise and the hare--except the hare has a warp drive so it can afford to take naps and still crush all the competition. You don't need to be determined and stable if the slightest exertion of your power leads to instant victory.
 
Last edited:
Oh, their economy is still on fire, it's just that once they patted out the worst of it they hadn't fallen nearly as far as to be at your level, so they are still better off. And they have far less centralized control, they just do more than you because each faction gets their own slice of control even if they don't necessarily coordinate.
Could you give some context to these? Because to me it doesn't sound like Most Industrialized should be so far ahead that they can catch fire and still be so far ahead that they're on a different level. I thought it meant that they'd bounce back quickly after it'd stopped smouldering.
1. Kingdom of Sketch (Economy: Most Industrialized But Smouldering, )

Great Powers
2. Ymaryn-Gylruv Dual Monarch (Economy: Precision Industrial, ) - Players
 
Could you give some context to these? Because to me it doesn't sound like Most Industrialized should be so far ahead that they can catch fire and still be so far ahead that they're on a different level. I thought it meant that they'd bounce back quickly after it'd stopped smouldering.
We started industrializing 30 years after they did, and we choose the slow but steady method. Our IC base is solid, but it is significantly less expansive than the Sketch's.
 
leaving our upper house to stagnate is an explicitly bad decision according to the GM himself.

Uh...source? AN has indicated that the Sketch can take more actions than us due to greater devolved power, yes, but this also comes with downsides (including, but not limited to, reduced central coordination of actions). I can't see anywhere he's explicitly said it's a bad idea to keep the Upper House at Minor Lawmaking. Hell, he didn't even say it was a bad idea to restrict them to Veto power, just that they'd get in a snit over it.
 
Uh...source? AN has indicated that the Sketch can take more actions than us due to greater devolved power, yes, but this also comes with downsides (including, but not limited to, reduced central coordination of actions). I can't see anywhere he's explicitly said it's a bad idea to keep the Upper House at Minor Lawmaking. Hell, he didn't even say it was a bad idea to restrict them to Veto power, just that they'd get in a snit over it.

Basically, they took functional Minor Lawmaking for themselves even though it wasn't given to them because they have power and influence and we can't afford to stop their every power grab, so reiterating the de jure laws will make them assume that it's an attack on their rights, leading to what amounts to being revolution.
 
[X]HanEmpire

Seems like a good trade off to give more power to the UH
Adhoc vote count started by Finite on May 21, 2018 at 4:56 PM, finished with 367 posts and 48 votes.

  • [X] Plan And Lawmaking for All
    -[X] [UH] +1 PW - Minor lawmaking
    -[X] [LH] 4 PW - Minor lawmaking (+1 Temp Happiness)
    -[X] [Assembly] 2 PW - Broad (+1 Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1)
    -[X] [Press] 2 PW - Free press (-1 Temp Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1, Academic Freedom Provides Half Consciousness to Innovation)
    [X] Plan FREEDOM
    -[X] [UH] 2 PW - Power of the purse
    -[X] [LH] 4 PW - Minor lawmaking (+1 Temp Happiness)
    -[X] [Assembly] 2 PW - Broad (+1 Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1)
    -[X] [Press] 2 PW - Free press (-1 Temp Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1, Academic Freedom Provides Half Consciousness to Innovation)
    [X] Plan Reliably and gradually
    -[X] [UH] +1 PW - Minor lawmaking
    -[X] [LH] 2 PW - Veto (+1 Temp Happiness)
    -[X] [Assembly] 2 PW - Broad (+1 Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1)
    -[X] [Press] 2 PW - Free press (-1 Temp Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1, Academic Freedom Provides Half Consciousness to Innovation)
    [X] Plan Show Some Godsdamned Restraint, People
    - [X] [UH] 2 PW - Veto
    - [X] [LH] 2 PW - Veto (+1 Temp Happiness)
    - [X] [Assembly] 2 PW - Broad (+1 Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1)
    - [X] [Press] 2 PW - Free press (-1 Temp Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1, Academic Freedom Provides Half Consciousness to Innovation)
    [X] Plan Xepheria 1844
    -[X] Develop Transport Infrastructure - 0 PW, -3 Temp IC, +1 Temp Consciousness, +1 Max Development
    -[X] Demonstrate Superiority - 1 PW: +1 Temp Consciousness, +2 Prestige
    -[X] Sell Crown Corporation (7/14) - 0 PW: +1 temp SoL (Usable once per turn)
    -[X] Increase Armies - 1PW: Temp Increases Armies by 3, +1 Temp Consciousness, -1 Temp IC
    -[X] Increase Armies x2 - 1PW: Temp Increases Armies by 3, +1 Temp Consciousness, -1 Temp IC
    -[X] Keep Tabs - 1 PW: -1 Temp Espionage, -1 Temp Trust, Additional Information on 2 other nations [Hung, Khem]
    -[X] Begin Constitutional Convention – 8 PW Invested
    [X][Research] Early Archaeology (0/???) [Social][Open]
 
Last edited:
Could you give some context to these? Because to me it doesn't sound like Most Industrialized should be so far ahead that they can catch fire and still be so far ahead that they're on a different level. I thought it meant that they'd bounce back quickly after it'd stopped smouldering.

I don't have proper numbers, but basically the lost a bunch of IC but gutted their education system for the spare change to repair enough damage so that they are still ahead of you. Like, they lost gobs of SoL and a big chunk of their IC, but they were far enough ahead on both of those that even after those losses they still have a stronger economy than you, and once they pat that out they will be back to pull ahead of everyone else as quickly as they possibly can.

Part of it is that because of the long delay before the meltdown they had a lot more time to build momentum and get further ahead than if they kept getting knocked back like they usually would, and during that time they invested a lot in business techs that helped a lot here.

Okay.
Where do other nations compare?

If not for the revolution tango that keeps blowing up their stuff the Hespranxer, Tortun, and Behryvar would all also be ahead of you. The Hes are now behind you for the time being, while SKF is about equal to you after looting the Behryvar (more heavy industry, less consumer goods) for now, even if they are likely to melt down if left to their own devices.
 
Last edited:
[X] Plan FREEDOM
-[X] [UH] 2 PW - Power of the purse
-[X] [LH] 4 PW - Minor lawmaking (+1 Temp Happiness)
-[X] [Assembly] 2 PW - Broad (+1 Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1)
-[X] [Press] 2 PW - Free press (-1 Temp Happiness, Min. Consciousness from Education Increased by 1, Academic Freedom Provides Half Consciousness to Innovation)​
 
Uh...source? AN has indicated that the Sketch can take more actions than us due to greater devolved power, yes, but this also comes with downsides (including, but not limited to, reduced central coordination of actions). I can't see anywhere he's explicitly said it's a bad idea to keep the Upper House at Minor Lawmaking. Hell, he didn't even say it was a bad idea to restrict them to Veto power, just that they'd get in a snit over it.
Here's the relevant quotes

If the Upper House doesn't have minor lawmaking or better they will see it as an assault on their privilege and you will probably have calls for a new constitution immediately (but not be able to do it for at least another decade) while if the commoners don't get a parliament with teeth and loosened censorship laws they will also be pissed at the end of the conference and probably be calling for an immediate do over.

Holding the tide against reckless development will end in Nokly being exiled at best, so you know. He will literally have to shut down all government function to do anything to stop that going forward in the long run, which will result in revolt by the nobles if not the nobles and commoners.
Generally, UH needs lawmaking minimum, and LH needs Veto min.

Edit: Also, we're not going to be able to stop the factions from polluting. It is, per WoAN, impossible unless we want to cripple ourselves and start a civil war/exile Nokly.
 
Last edited:
Uh...source? AN has indicated that the Sketch can take more actions than us due to greater devolved power, yes, but this also comes with downsides (including, but not limited to, reduced central coordination of actions). I can't see anywhere he's explicitly said it's a bad idea to keep the Upper House at Minor Lawmaking. Hell, he didn't even say it was a bad idea to restrict them to Veto power, just that they'd get in a snit over it.

Causing a revolt by rolling back lawmaking powers is your definition of a good idea?

The Sketch had a 30 year lead at the start of the quest and they kept it up so much that even the biggest economic crisis just caused them to stubble for 2 phases at most. If you can't see why having an advantage of 2x Actions is a cause for change then I don't know what else to tell you. We need to get a modern government for the extra PW cap+regen and the extended action scope to even be able to compete. Just look at the most recent update for how easily the Sketch recovered and profited.
 
Basically, they took functional Minor Lawmaking for themselves even though it wasn't given to them because they have power and influence and we can't afford to stop their every power grab, so reiterating the de jure laws will make them assume that it's an attack on their rights, leading to what amounts to being revolution.

Okay, first off that's an exaggeration, he said that Nokly would have to fight the nobles over it but he didn't say it would lead to literal revolution.

Second, I'm not advocating we restrict them to Veto power, I'm just pointing out that even that decision - which would definitely be more questionable than codifying their Minor Lawmaking status - hasn't been called out as explicitly bad by AN. This serves my actual point, which is that drasteed's assertion ("leaving our upper house to stagnate is an explicitly bad decision according to the GM himself") is completely false.
Here's the relevant quotes




Generally, UH needs lawmaking minimum, and LH needs Veto min.

Edit: Also, we're not going to be able to stop the factions from polluting. It is, per WoAN, impossible unless we want to cripple ourselves and start a civil war/exile Nokly.

Yeah, okay, again, that doesn't actually address the point I'm making - which is that nowhere has AN said it's explicitly a bad idea to leave the Upper House with "only" Minor Lawmaking powers.
 
I don't have proper numbers, but basically the lost a bunch of IC but gutted their education system for the spare change to repair enough damage so that they are still ahead of you. Like, they lost gobs of SoL and a big chunk of their IC, but they were far enough ahead on both of those that even after those losses they still have a stronger economy than you, and once they pat that out they will be back to pull ahead of everyone else as quickly as they possibly can.

Part of it is that because of the long delay before the meltdown they had a lot more time to build momentum and get further ahead than if they kept getting knocked back like they usually would, and during that time they invested a lot in business techs that helped a lot here.

And of course, I imagine that they can just buy their Education back up, because there are never consequences for plundering the future to pay for the present as long as you have enough money, right?

I mean, logically speaking, doing what you've suggested they do should have led to a revolution, because people who have an extensively high SoL suddenly tanking it is going to hurt--especially considering that the only real way you can justify the extreme industrialization that you're suggesting the Sketch have (To the point of being better than literally everyone else combined apparently) is if everyone can pay for enough trinkets to justify the suffering.

I mean, I'm not saying that this is straight up impossible, but it probably shouldn't have been obfuscated if Sketch could outproduce the rest of the world combined, which you're suggesting they are to be able to afford the solution you say they executed. It should have clearly stated "Greater industrial development than everyone else in the top five combined" in that state, as such a detail probably shouldn't have been missed.

An economic crash in a pre-communications world shouldn't have been recovered from as quickly as the Sketch did, not with the government style they had, not when theoretically, they should have had to cajole every individual factory baron to play along with the scheme.

Unless the problem here is that they could just constantly raise PW and hang onto a massive stockpile to whip everyone into submission in a crisis--which again, isn't how governments work, but eh.
 
Last edited:
Okay, first off that's an exaggeration, he said that Nokly would have to fight the nobles over it but he didn't say it would lead to literal revolution.

Second, I'm not advocating we restrict them to Veto power, I'm just pointing out that even that decision - which would definitely be more questionable than codifying their Minor Lawmaking status - hasn't been called out as explicitly bad by AN. This serves my actual point, which is that drasteed's assertion ("leaving our upper house to stagnate is an explicitly bad decision according to the GM himself") is completely false.


Yeah, okay, again, that doesn't actually address the point I'm making - which is that nowhere has AN said it's explicitly a bad idea to leave the Upper House with "only" Minor Lawmaking powers.


Holding the tide against reckless development will end in Nokly being exiled at best, so you know. He will literally have to shut down all government function to do anything to stop that going forward in the long run, which will result in revolt by the nobles if not the nobles and commoners.

Sounds like revolution to me.

Sorry, misread your post.
 
Back
Top