King-wise, we only have an average king, so it's not like we're risking the life of a very talented person.
Uh...if the king dies in the field you're going to be seeing a MAJOR problem. King dying to Republicans is a terrible image
King-wise, we only have an average king, so it's not like we're risking the life of a very talented person.
Yeah, the death of the King isn't exactly meaningfull.
Also, we're no longer elective so if we loose to many Kings too fast, we will get progressively worse once, or regencies.
There's only one way to find that out in-universe.How about let's not do infinite war bond and money machine? That way is hyperinflation.
My problem is less that we didn't keep our (frankly extreme) values and more that we see them replaced by real world Western values (which especially in the 18th century were far from universal) as if they were some kind of automatic human default. It was, among other factors, the early Roman Christian church that made individual private property popular in Europe. Many cultures even now cling to more collectivist ideas, despite rampant westernization through England and the US exporting their culture. In a world where Rome had a cultural rival like Ymar influencing as far as Scandinavia, and the hellenization of the near East never happened, you'd expect more noticeable differences.The "generic westernized empire" is typical for a post collapse large and highly advanced empire. In OTL that was Rome, in our timeline it was Ymaryn AND Rome.
Of course this should be gone. But I'd expect remnants, like much less stigma on suicide and less respect for the elderly who burden society.
This one of course is quick to die without constant top down reinforcement. People looking out for themselves after what used to be meant by "Greater" literally fell apart only makes sense.
This one actually did partially survive as a minority trait if I understood correctly. People near the cores still care about the forests and we are amenable to the economic stewardship thing, more than a typical previously feudal civilization probably would be.
Shouldn't scapegoating similar to Korea still happen quite a bit then?
Backwards and barbaric maybe. But not quite as horrifying as it would seem to real world 18th century Germans for instance. On the other hand the rampant dehumanization of the mentally ill that was typical for the time in Europe should seem worse to the Ymaryn than to any real world contemporary.So you know, of course it looks horrifying and alien to the modern Ymaryn.
The government is the one taking out the loans via banks correct? Does the guild incur any additional debt if we chose bank and stuff opiton?
The more resources option costs permanent, not temporary, Espionage, yes?
By the way @Academia Nut, but where IS Hunrix IX? A reread of the update seems to imply that he's not within Hespranxer at the moment so am I correct in assuming he took refuge in a neighboring kingdom?
Also, is there anything particularly time sensitive about this plot or can we wait to see how things develop over there first?
You do realize that the more resources option has a greater chance of us getting implicated even if we kill the guy right?Honestly?
Worth it.
Fumbling this would be really, really bad.
We can raise our Espionage later, but being implicated here could cost us a lot, and lose us oodles of Diplomacy and Trust.
Blergh.Or domestic republicans take it as a divine omen that the age of kings is over and starts shit while we're at war. Currenrly they only shut up due to a sense of affronted nationalism after all.
We can raise our Espionage later, but being implicated here could cost us a lot, and lose us oodles of Diplomacy and Trust.
The thing is, 'standard western europe values' are not complicated. They are survival values. Values which maximize immediate social stability and protection of your in group. They ARE particularly common around post-collapse great civilizations because of the unique scenario of people with a lot of advanced tools and weapons without the ability to make more. I.e. they are the natural collapse state.My problem is less that we didn't keep our (frankly extreme) values and more that we see them replaced by real world Western values (which especially in the 18th century were far from universal) as if they were some kind of automatic human default. It was, among other factors, the early Roman Christian church that made individual private property popular in Europe. Many cultures even now cling to more collectivist ideas, despite rampant westernization through England and the US exporting their culture. In a world where Rome had a cultural rival like Ymar influencing as far as Scandinavia, and the hellenization of the near East never happened, you'd expect more noticeable differences.
Of course this should be gone. But I'd expect remnants, like much less stigma on suicide and less respect for the elderly who burden society.
This one of course is quick to die without constant top down reinforcement. People looking out for themselves after what used to be meant by "Greater" literally fell apart only makes sense.
This one actually did partially survive as a minority trait if I understood correctly. People near the cores still care about the forests and we are amenable to the economic stewardship thing, more than a typical previously feudal civilization probably would be.
Shouldn't scapegoating similar to Korea still happen quite a bit then?
Backwards and barbaric maybe. But not quite as horrifying as it would seem to real world 18th century Germans for instance. On the other hand the rampant dehumanization of the mentally ill that was typical for the time in Europe should seem worse to the Ymaryn than to any real world contemporary.
Or to put it differently, our reactionary conservatives should look quite different from reactionary conservatives in western Syffryn, let alone real world Europe.
Yes.You do realize that the more resources option has a greater chance of us getting implicated even if we kill the guy right?
Success, Caught: We still have an example of constitutional monarchy set up in a stable testbed. It will hurt relations with extremist Republican states, but moderate Republicans are likely to become more friendly and Monarchists...keep in mind the territory we're doing it in is a hotbed of inter-noble conflict. A royal assassination for political convenience is extreme but not beyond the pale. Ymaryn paternalism is a known diplomatic factor already. It just goes a step further
We aren't propping him up that much though? We're killing the current claimant to let THEM pick whichever remaining noble is best fit for the Kingship they want. Which happens to fit both their self interest and our interestOr if it gets out the Hespranxer could decide that he's just a foreign puppet, kill him, and double down on Republicanism.
Getting caught assassinating the guy makes it harder for the guy we're installing to do stuff if he gets in power.
The plan is explicitly to put this guy we found with a claim to the throne in charge of Hespranxer after we assassinate the other guy.We aren't propping him up that much though? We're killing the current claimant to let THEM pick whichever remaining noble is best fit for the Kingship they want. Which happens to fit both their self interest and our interest
No, it's not. The royalists and the others will do so themselves after Hunrix dies.The plan is explicitly to put this guy we found with a claim to the throne in charge of Hespranxer after we assassinate the other guy.