I mean, when the choice is to either to try to get it better, or just sort of do nothing as bad things are still happening, why not try?I thought my
But I really do believe falling into Imperialism and trying to do it BETTER is a fools gambit seeing as people are complaining we're barely holding it together RN, not to mention our inability/lack of action in regards to actually dealing with our own social issues. I'll eat my lunch if we pull it off though.
I've given up arguing with everyone about the dangers of it and return instead, to my memes.
With the volume of steel we're buying, we could put the tariff back up and they wouldn't care.
Well, we kinda can't, as AN just said. The cost of that course of actions is just too much and too contradictory.
The thing is, even with future sight? Its bad in that it allows bad practices to perpetuate, it generates anti-competitive behaviors...which are all natural effects of an evolutionarily successful approach. Its like how the Guilds are to Unions really.
Since @soulcake has yet to put what I figured would be really obvious, I suppose I shall have to point this out
The absolute fastest way to environmentalism is Romantic Paternalism and to go a conquering to set up Natural History Museums to supercharge research into bioscience.
Yes, if you want your TREES then conquering as many ecosystems as possible is the fastest route.
Incidentally annexing the rich ecosystem of the east coast of Africa would add so, so many trees to our clay.Since @soulcake has yet to put what I figured would be really obvious, I suppose I shall have to point this out
The absolute fastest way to environmentalism is Romantic Paternalism and to go a conquering to set up Natural History Museums to supercharge research into bioscience.
Yes, if you want your TREES then conquering as many ecosystems as possible is the fastest route.
Meh, if I wanted to read about arrogant imperialist assholes with "good" intentions fucking things up, I'd open a history book.
The trees stand in the way of progress. They'll have to go!Since @soulcake has yet to put what I figured would be really obvious, I suppose I shall have to point this out
The absolute fastest way to environmentalism is Romantic Paternalism and to go a conquering to set up Natural History Museums to supercharge research into bioscience.
Yes, if you want your TREES then conquering as many ecosystems as possible is the fastest route.
I mean, its either 'don't be imperialist and watch the world burn in the fires of empire' or 'be imperialist and watch the world burn with smaller fires of empire'
Any chance we divert the focus of our imperialism to southeast Asia? Both the unclaimed bits and parts of the Maharathan Empire?Since @soulcake has yet to put what I figured would be really obvious, I suppose I shall have to point this out
The absolute fastest way to environmentalism is Romantic Paternalism and to go a conquering to set up Natural History Museums to supercharge research into bioscience.
Yes, if you want your TREES then conquering as many ecosystems as possible is the fastest route.
Well, if you put it that way...Since @soulcake has yet to put what I figured would be really obvious, I suppose I shall have to point this out
The absolute fastest way to environmentalism is Romantic Paternalism and to go a conquering to set up Natural History Museums to supercharge research into bioscience.
Yes, if you want your TREES then conquering as many ecosystems as possible is the fastest route.
Coaling stations kind of makes going into Africa unavoidable. About the only way to stop it would to be for us to build the Not!Suez Canal before we need coaling stations...
Theory of Empires: Romantic Arborealism
