When all the Metics split the Adriatic Sea and Migrate out of the citySo, when will we be renaming the Epulian League to the League of Kymai?
Please be civil.Except we've blatantly been told most of them, if not all of the Metics we currently have don't have either the ability, or inclination to leave. That there will be no mass exodus as you both claim, either gradual or otherwise. Further they're going to be getting a pay rise due to rising labour costs and thus better circumstances in the future.
So basically, what you've said is untrue
I don't know, I kind of like not having so many of the problems and infrastructural issues required to maintain control of a large slave population.After the Messapii are integrated, Eretria should lower the ristrictions on slaves. The same dangers that were once present are diminishing enough that we can be less worried about a danger inside the polis.
The tax cut hits in a few years' time after the census. It's not "affordable" in the sense of "we can have it without any consequences," but that's far from saying it's not "affordable" in the sense of "this will beggar the city and ruin everything."We already are deficit spending and can anticipate further costs from transporting Kymai, we pushed off the rower training and sacred band expansions due to the shortage of funds so no the tax cut is not affordable.
As @Cetashwayo explicitly said, metics cannot buy up land outside the city, which is the part that's important to citizen land-ownership for purposes of who gets to be a hoplite. The land inside the city bought up by metics will probably mostly be land already occupied by metics, and the only citizens likely to be hurt are landlords who make their living renting out to metics, a class there can't be that many of. Especially not that many who are willing to sell the living spaces they currently rent out.In addition we already have an issue with limited land for citizens, letting the Metics buy up the land will reduce citizen land (and thus hoplite percentage) further.
See, the difference between you and me is, I don't think the current situation with metics is stable in the long run. Metics make up a majority of the Eretrian population, they're barred from politics, our economy depends on their labor, and we tax the hell out of them. Except they're not slaves, so we don't have this huge machinery in place to repress them.And we already over conceded last time to the Metics by giving them 4 of 5 demands, if we give ground this time they will just push further the next session. At some point we have to stop and doing so now before we hurt our income is a good time to do so.
I mean, what would that look like? How would you expect that to go?@Cetashwayo - Are there any instances of Greek polities capitulating too much to their metic populations? I know Sparta is an example of the opposite, of the citizen status being so fiercely guarded.
That seems like an excellent way to incite hatred, if not outright revols. Much of our power stems from our vassals not viewing us as tyranical overlords.
The something to show for it is not irritating the rest of our league by making a mess of the colonial laws that we just recently agreed upon. None of them would be able to get a handle on this new massive new colony on barbaroi land through introducing prior residents of their cities to become the new citizens, we entirely circle around the process that we previously burned Ankon on even though they were previously existing on their current spot and definitely didn't want to pry open their citizenship. I wouldn't take irritating them so lightly; together they hold a veto that they can use on league decisions if they don't like our actions. I don't really care that much about Kymai's proud heritage and traditions, apparently ~80% of the current potential colonists are also willing to drop being so rigid about the citizenship if it means living and the ones that aren't can be mostly made up with increased emigration anyway.I'm pretty concerned about this movement to impose Eretrian law on New Kymai.
Right now, we have a lot of goodwill in the city. From the update, though, it's clear that forcing people to live under Eretrian laws is extremely unpopular.
One of the themes that we seen, over and over again, is that Kymai is a proud city, that takes pride in its heritage and traditions. By forcing them to live under League laws, we're spending that goodwill with nothing to show for it.
Let's be real -- if all we're aiming to do is to settle 1500 people at a port, we might as well go to Taras and buy 1500 Sikeliote slaves while prices are cheap, who we set free to settle at OTL Split or Dubrovnik. It will be cheaper, faster, require much less of a logistics chain, and considerably less alienating to every naval power between us and the swamp hicks.
What we are trying to save is not just the people, but Kymaian institutions; we're trying to build a partner, not a colony, and that requires a less heavy-handed, more indirect approach.
This is rather uncharitable of you, verging on the deceptive. Cetashwayo said earlier that we would only have the chance to evacuate something around I think ~7500 by default, so 15000 was never even on the table. I don't know why you're pushing this 1500 number for my proposal either, as the vote itself only brings it down to 2000 compared to a high of 2700 (definitely not 15000) for your preferred option. Both numbers in either case are quite likely to increase as the siege carries on and a few things happen: they run out of hope that they'll find another way to survive on site, they have more time to think over the idea in that depressing atmosphere, and finally that they hear of some successes in settlement in Eretria and beyond and so it is no longer a zany scheme but a possibility. Desperation will do a fair amount to inflate the numbers regardless of whether they're a fan of the citizenship policy as I think some people who are presently haughty on it may reconsider as they begin to starve and spend another couple of years watching the flocks outside the walls.Also, the math regarding colony growth isn't correct. We're assuming that the choice we make now does not lock us out of other choices and squander our goodwill; I'd expect only about 1500 freemen to travel to a colony that's an Eretrian dependency, and I'd expect close to the full 15000 to resettle at something that's truly Nea Kymai.
Assuming that, and using the 1%/2% growth rate difference from above, it's going to be 234 years before the 1500-person Eretrian dependency outgrows the 15000-person Nea Kymai.
Recall that Rhegion is primarily a naval trade power that is separated from these cities by ocean, so therefore it suffers from a similar problem that we do in the Kymai situation to helping Greek colonies on the Lucanian coast. Shepherds don't have ships for them to blow up and can just melt back up into the hills if ever Rhegion gets to the point of launching an expensive overseas expedition, messing around there until it starts getting a bit too costly and Rhegion is forced to leave. It doesn't help that Rhegion's actual land forces are much more anemic than ours. Also, to take control over these cities it would first need to defeat them; consider that Poseidonia was taken over in a night attack right after they broke out into civil disorder, do you think that other ambitious Lucanian chiefs looking to repeat this feat might have their antennae raised for signs of strife like a war among their Greek neighbors?The Sicily option might upset Taras but it seems to be the option with the lowest reward for Rhegion (and fairly enough also the lowest risk) and means it will be somewhat contained and distracted by all the other big powers on Sicily while the northern option might be distasteful for betraying a potential friend like Hylel (and thus could carry some risk for the evacuation) and risk angering the other rising power in the region who lately hasn't been to happy with us but it would also put Rhegion on a confrontational course against the Lucani and Oscans which seems very useful for those of you who dream of a combined effort against them and, and I admit this could be a positive or negative depending on your own opinion, would make it far easier for Rhegion to actually succeed in "conquering" Kymai which while far from optimal would at the very least deny to the Oscans and further preserve an Greek presence in this key region (though i have to say it is certainly ambitious). Hell, in the "best" case Rhegion succeeds in subjugating its rival and then spends the next few years fighting the Oscans, thus weakening a potential enemy and being unable to become a big problem in southern Italy itself.
The vote says there are 2500 potential freemen to evacuate as it stands, if they abide by the standards of our league that'll drop to 2000 freemen and if we make an exception to keep their restricted citizenship then it'll be 2700, no multiplication needed. Both would probably climb higher the further the siege drags on. Which reminds me- say, @Cetashwayo, if Kymai's laws are kept would those freemen all be considered as citizens at the new Kymai? You mentioned Afexi citizenship, Google brought up nothing but would that be the granting of citizenship to any of the freemen of Kymai who came with them to the colony even if they were previously a Metic or something?From these two posts, we can derive that the ratio of freemen to citizens in Kymai is about 3.1.
That means, from this choice alone, we're looking at a population difference of 3.1*2000 = 6200 if we make them accept our laws, versus 3.1 * 2700 = 8370 if we don't -- assuming that this doesn't lock us out of the high-population path entirely, given how unpopular it is among the Kymaians.
For our league we want a cohesive culture and mutual bonds such that we all feel strongly for the well-being of our fellow cities and act in unison rather than getting deadlocked- particularly as league cities now hold the veto, so if internal divisions arise we could find ourselves eventually paralyzed on league matters. Slamming shut the opportunity to colonize in this huge and wonderful harbor in everyone else's face does not do that; it makes our Adriatic colonies more heterogenous rather than less and eliminates an incentive for the joining of Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros where they might have sent their surplus population thereabouts. Their surplus population which is familiar with the local clime, the cultivation of crops within it and the customs of local groups such as the Daorsi and Pleraei, as well as providing familiar points of contact for trade between these colonies. As well, bear in mind that the Kymai population is actually rather weak in terms of their number of able-bodied freemen of military age on account of their string of painful defeats against the Campanians. If you are wanting to bring up the number of hoplites, it may be best if immigrant men could be brought in and become citizens to marry citizen maidens and widows who may bear citizen children; otherwise a lot of saved women citizens are likely to become old without bearing children, or marrying metics whose children as non-citizens cannot become hoplites.As a military policy, I would much prefer hoplites furnished from a proud, staunchly loyal ally, confident in themselves and indebted to us; to hoplites from a dependency who resents our dominance. Given that morale, not individual strength, was the key to winning hoplite engagements -- and this is broadly true of any spear formation -- we want to be keeping this in mind, given that we're going to be doing a lot of fighting in the near future.
1) We have prior precedent for not keeping the citizenship the same as if transplanting a city across the waves were business as usual- for instance, the illustrious Theron would be languishing in slavery had Eretria not loosened its citizenship on arrival. They who arrive on Eretrian ships, fed and housed in the meanwhile by the Eretria- are they too good to adhere to the laws of her league, the same as any other city would? It's a colony established by Eretria expense and effort with citizens formerly descended of Eretria to be in Eretria's League. It is no independent city doing this on a lark with its own time and resources, let us be clear about that. If we spin this fabrication then any of the cities that we're courting could point out how we forced this on Ankon over its protests despite it having been established prior to the ruling.1)It's only "inconsistent" if we treat new Kymai as an Etreian colony instead of an independent city.
2)The people who immigrate to the new kymai will just go to other cities as long as one is open
3)The colony citizenship thing is not a method to spread trade contracts, it is a release valve to dump the urban poor somewhere unproblematic. The immigrants will not be the sort to have contacts with merchants.
In regards to this point specifically'
They are neither powerful nor having an overwhelming reason to be grateful to Eretria in particular, and at least in the case of Melaina Kerkyra a same mother city is shared with the former Lykaians and they even share a part of the same islands. It is possible that it could provoke some such sentiment regardless, in which case we definitely should not further exacerbate it by walling off this huge new polis amidst them from any of their own influence when we have the chance to do this together with the league.Ins't that true of any new city we invite and most of the ones already here? Only our new colones will have citizens from other cities.
Just these 700 Freemen would mean an additional League trireme once New Kymai is up an running, not waiting for immigration required.500 freemen in Melaina Kerkyra and 1,000 in Epidauros. They could provide about 3 more triremes and probably no more than 2 and a half more talents of income in dues.
I'm proposing an easing of restrictions, not there complete removal. Large populations are still too risky. Getting enough to take some of the edge off the Metic tax obligations and reducing labor costs would be fine, I think. We don't want the problems you mentioned to be exacerbated too much.Perhaps the problem is that you imagine that when I say "a mass exodus," I mean "all the metics will leave within a matter of months" or something similarly ridiculous.
No. That is not what I mean.
What I mean is that the metic labor supply will contract, as able-bodied and enterprising metics strike out for the colonies in relatively greater numbers, faster than they otherwise would, fast enough to have an impact on the economy.
The remaining metics will be able to demand higher wages, because citizen employers have no alternative. That in turn means greater economic pressure on employers, which is a problem given how many of our citizens rely on land farmed by metic tenant farmers for their income. We may find citizens indirectly driven into poorer circumstances because rising metic wages mean that the metics are in a stronger position to negotiate more favorable tenant farming arrangements, giving a smaller share of their agricultural produce to their citizen landlords.
Which, in turn, means pissed off hoplites and aristocrats.
I don't know, I kind of like not having so many of the problems and infrastructural issues required to maintain control of a large slave population.
Also, keeping statutory limits on personal slave ownership has done a lot to limit wealth and income inequality in Eretria. Our aristocrats are nowhere near as rich as they could be if they owned arbitrarily large numbers of slaves, and the slave limit has done a lot to force our aristocrats to look at commerce as a valid source of personal income, which in turn is driving a lot of our trade/commercial focus.
If we wanted to go the warrior-farmer route (Sparta and Rome being examples of states that go down this road), we'd probably be fine with that. For the merchant-thalassocracy route (more like Athens or Venice), it's not so desirable.