Hm.

This gives me a new image.

Eretria: the Katamari Polis!
NAAAA NA NA NANA NANA NA NA KATAMARI POLICY!
Adhoc vote count started by Godwinson on Jun 5, 2019 at 5:58 AM, finished with 616 posts and 97 votes.
 
To be honest I always had Eretria figured out as some kind of shounen anime protagonist.

We're obsessed with getting stronger and heavily oriented around conflict.

Our story is structured in "arcs", each of which has an escalating antagonist and set of stakes, as our strength grows.

Also, we have a habit of "befriending" regular series antagonists by defeating them, then being generous to them in victory and turning them into allies.

There is no explicit proof of a ridiculous hairstyle, but at this point I think we can come to the logical conclusion.
 
To be honest I always had Eretria figured out as some kind of shounen anime protagonist.

We're obsessed with getting stronger and heavily oriented around conflict.

Our story is structured in "arcs", each of which has an escalating antagonist and set of stakes, as our strength grows.

Also, we have a habit of "befriending" regular series antagonists by defeating them, then being generous to them in victory and turning them into allies.

There is no explicit proof of a ridiculous hairstyle, but at this point I think we can come to the logical conclusion.
I think that's what our beards are for?
 
I now wonder what the Celts would think of our beards when Eretria finally meets them.

Celts are more about moustaches, if I recall right.
 
Well, the blue hair would be a Celtic thing.

We'd be more likely to use kermes for our hair dye, since we can source it locally. Men who want to pretend they aren't starting to go gray tend to abruptly become redheads. Women too, come to think of it.
 
I think that in this timeline, it's less that Eretrians look like Lincoln and more that Lincoln looks like an Eretrian. Maybe it'd be something contemporary commentators will joke about. He's got the beard, he wrestles, he frees slaves, it's uncanny.
 
I think that in this timeline, it's less that Eretrians look like Lincoln and more that Lincoln looks like an Eretrian. Maybe it'd be something contemporary commentators will joke about. He's got the beard, he wrestles, he frees slaves, it's uncanny.
Except you know for that fact Lincoln would never be born and the USA would never form due to increasingly alternate events in Europe. Unless this becomes some strange Turtledove timeline. :V
 
I think that in this timeline, it's less that Eretrians look like Lincoln and more that Lincoln looks like an Eretrian. Maybe it'd be something contemporary commentators will joke about. He's got the beard, he wrestles, he frees slaves, it's uncanny.
I mean, if we survive intact culturally even as an 'ally of the Romans' we could potentially leave a massively disproportionate cultural footprint in the bedrock of a lot of Western civilization.

It's probably not anyone here's idea of a victory but surviving as a powerful economic and cultural center as a socii and trying to exert influence that way would be fascinating.
 
This anti-piracy plan of ours looking better everyday. If we manage to gain the trust and friendship of at least some of the Adriatic powers then we can perhaps form some sort of defence league there which can guarantee our trade and boost our colonial project too. Onwards to the Drakonian Dream! :-D
 
So, I'm going through the first arc of Magna Graecia, and the first meeting with Taras struck me as a bit tragic in retrospect:
Taras: Arrival

The three ships are sent off with much fanfare. Though after a storm one of them comes to ground near the Messapii city of Gnatia, they are able to push her back into the city to the other two, and they proceed down the coast. The coastal plain is huge here; it stretches into the distance, and there are many cities which can be visibly observed from the ships; however the Messapii cities were not contacted and as a result their names are not yet known. That shall have to wait some time. It was with great elation that the ships found their way to the city of Hydrus. A town, not truly a city, Hydrus was quite obviously Greek with a small acropolis and some Greek ships moored in their harbor. When the captain landed and explained their predicament, however, he was eyed very suspiciously. The city was apparently a dependency of Taras and thus under their control; as a result, they probed the captain for questions about his origin. They did not truly believe that he came from where he said he was from; they demanded that he be sent back to Metapontion as Taras was at war with it. It was an awkward situation.

It was only when an older citizen, who was apparently from Eretrea himself, inquired about the city they had come from that they were able to confirm the captain's polis. With that, the mood changed, he was served and hosted, and then his ships repaired and sent on their way, with direction around the coast to Taras. Along the way they came by the city of Kaliopolis, which was a small one; visibly the captain could see a foreboding Messapii citadel nearby. Finally, as the peninsula started to turn towards the west, the captain found his way to Taras. After a similar grilling as given at Hydrus, the captain was welcome to the city by Aristophilides, the king of Taras. Explaining the democratic nature of Eretrea might have inspired fear in some Tyrants, but the king seemed disinterested in the topic dismissing it as "your way, not ours". It was when the captain explained the city's problems of starvation that the king shook his head. This wouold not do; they were fellow Greeks and Taras had overflowing stores of grain.

As a result, he offers the captain a sort of welcoming gift to Magna Graecia, a proof of why the Greeks here are Greater. He will ship to the city enough food to allay the starvation until the land clearance is fully completed. It will be at the fairly low cost of 15 talents, from Greek to Greek, and the captain can even be escorted by Tarentine ships back. If the Eretreans refuse, this is good too, for Taras is not a city of grudges.
 
@Cetashwayo, did the Classical Greeks go further into the field of archaeology than trying to search for the places that are mentioned in the Illiad and the Oddysey? I recall some Greek Philosopher saying that by his time roughly half of the places are unknown.
 
@Cetashwayo, did the Classical Greeks go further into the field of archaeology than trying to search for the places that are mentioned in the Illiad and the Oddysey? I recall some Greek Philosopher saying that by his time roughly half of the places are unknown.
I suspect they didn't have the right frame of mind for archaeology. Ancient attempts to engage in archaeology tended to dissolve into sensationalism and treasure hunting.
 
Speaking of Archaeology...do we have a Library in Eretria Eschate? Scrolls in houses?

What exactly are we doing archaeology-wise? I know we had managed to preserve the foundation stones of the old Peucetii buildings in Old Bare by...girdling it inside the houses? And our cemetery...hope we don't forget that place centuries afterwards.
 
Last edited:
There are also cases where mercenaries have been flipped by the enemy offering better pay, but these seem more like isolated intrigues, usually of garrisons, rather than of an entire army.
From what I recall, it was more common with less professional mercenaries.
Mercenary bands have a reputation, and while abandoning a sinking ship because they wouldn't pay you(or wouldn't increase the pay due to greater hazard, which is a thing they can demand) is one thing and mostly expected, betraying your paid contract just means you wouldn't get any more hires.
 
> Taras is not a city of grudges.

Well that was a fucking lie.
To be fair, we did sink a knife in pretty hard there, as I recall.

"Taras was not a city of grudges... until the Eretrians taught us how."

Speaking of Archaeology...do we have a Library in Eretria Eschate? Scrolls in houses?
We definitely have scrolls and written works belonging to various people and collected by those people who are interested. We almost certainly don't have a library, because libraries were not, as far as we can tell, A Thing in this time period. Books (or rather, scrolls) were stored by people who felt like storing them and had the money to devote a room in their house to the purpose. If you wanted to read something on a topic you didn't know about, you found a friend who knew about it and asked them if you could borrow their scroll(s).

So for example, if you want to find something on mathematics and you're not sure who in the city has it, you would go around and ask. Leukos the Accountant is into that kind of thing, so he might have a copy. There are some other mathy-geometer types in the city, too, and Leukos probably knows all or almost all of them personally. After all, there less than 23,000 adult males in the polis, and most of the ones who aren't primarily farmers by trade live within the same set of city walls, so Leukos would have had occasion to get to know them over the course of his life.

So that scroll you're looking for on the applications of Thales' Theorem? If there's a copy in the city, Leukos probably knows who has it, or knows someone who knows, and if you go running around the city in circles for a few days being referred back and forth, you'll find it. If there's a copy in the city, which is not a given of course.

There's a pretty good chance that if any of them have ever read it, they can just tell you whatever it was you wanted to know, too- the ratio of written knowledge to knowledge stored in human brains was a lot lower in this era.

What exactly are we doing archaeology-wise? I know we had managed to preserve the foundation stones of the old Peucetii buildings in Old Bare by...girdling it inside the houses? And our cemetery...hope we don't forget that place centuries afterwards.
As I recall, many of those foundation stones were subsequently removed to add bulk and strength to the Hill of the Divine Marriage.

It's important to understand that the ancients didn't have a concept of "archaeology" the way we understand the term. They just had a concept of "old stuff." Old stuff could be interesting, but there wasn't any inherent moral value in preserving it exactly the way it was, as a rule, with rare exceptions. There was no systemic, scientific study of the old stuff from the past, any more than there was a systematic, scientific study of anything else. There were scholars and antiquarians, who would no doubt collect old relics and texts and have their own ideas about what it all meant, but that's not the same thing as "archaeology."

...

Moreover, building things was very hard, or at least building durable structuers was. It was often much much harder than modifying them or tearing them apart for materials to make a new building. Building stones had to be chiseled out of rock. By hand. With metal tools that were kind of crappy. The reason the ancients often tore apart old structures for building stone is because it let them build things without wasting thousands of man-hours on back-breaking manual labor to quarry new stones. Almost anything made out of metal would be recycled rather than thrown away, too.
 
Back
Top