- Location
- Somewhere.
She is literally a demigod already.
She is literally a demigod already.
Lilly is like a goddess, isn't she. Saving the day just like that, as of it where nothing at all. Now with a flow ethos that thrives on heroics, for the sale of making followers.
The first to witness her in actions, boosted by the new ethos, are here family. Personally saved was well.
I wonder what it must have felt like to witness Lilly dismantle Valerie, save them, and abduct her.
Now boosted by the flow ethos too. Assuming it has a passive effect that matches said flavour text, might not.
I'm pretty sure that the {Sample Space} malfunction is Child of the Maw's little..."game". It's noticeably outside Concord. It could absolutely produce that effect.
Usually half a second timeframe for crazy stunts is impossible to react to.Well, it might be that spirits like Aboleath get some degree of "immunity" from Concordance, and I'm guessing [Sample Space] is somewhat reliant on Lilly being "the only variable" a la Groundhog Day. [Sample Space] could choose an action that was "the perfect move" the first time around, but once your opponent knows it's coming, they'll react differently.
...That's not how any of this works, Edifier. That's something that would already be factored in. Our new Ethos pick, though...If it's still downloading, at least, it could probably do Something Funky, if it's not the Maw.Myah may also be using her powers to buff Lilly, which may make Lilly over-perform from the simulation.
Ehhh..
The spoiler bits we've gotten suggest things didn't exactly go fantastically, for all that it hasn't been a Game Over and the Valerie Problem has been neutralized, and it suggests the reason for this is because we relied on Concordance to help, because somehow {Sample Space} doesn't give us good data but it still fires off
But the good roll on Shine is nice!
I really don't see it. It's always been a second person/narrator talking to or about Lilly, with the obvious exception of something like [Dissolution of the Self], which speaks much more directly in its threats.
The bold text here is pretty clearly Lilly's commentary, and even the rest of it could be argued as still her. Compare with Temporal Redeemer, say.You have played the part of the good daughter whilst guarding the true feelings of your heart and desires for the future carefully. Though it was never your deliberate intention, you are in fact a well practiced and expert liar. Capable of convincing even yourself that every lie is a necessity and burying any guilt that might expose you. To embrace a life of deception in many forms big and small would be a tremendous departure both from what direction you expected your life to take and from what you consider an honourable path. It would however give you immediate and potent tools to become a free roaming woman beholden to no-one. This is an extreme option, could you even really return home with such an Ethos? Could you break your parents heart by having them behold a daughter holding such an ignoble future?
This one, on the other hand, has little to no input from Lilly, being fully the Ethos's sales pitch.[Temporal Redeemer] (Mythic): Concordance
She wished she could take it back, so she did. He missed the mark by a mere moment, except he actually didn't. The forward facing path is merely a suggestion to those who know the more crooked and interesting tracks, though beware what sort of wild things can be found outside the bounds of the causal. A promise need not be kept if it was never given. The loan never taken need not be repaid. The timeless are few in number, and jealously guard their domain
Sure, [Temporal Redeemer]'s description has a different tone, as does [Limited Coordinate] for example, but I see no systematic difference in Ethos descriptions over time, that's what I'm disagreeing with there. [Quickwrit Stenovoker] comes after [Temporal Redeemer] for example and goes back to the earlier type of description:This one, on the other hand, has little to no input from Lilly, being fully the Ethos's sales pitch.
[Quickwrit Stennovoker] (Common): (Mana) | Unique
Your father forced hour upon hour on you learning the most basic of runic carvings to the utmost height of meaningless precision. You harbour a unique and profound dislike for such mind numbing perfection and reject it utterly. Good enough is literally good enough, you will walk a path none before you have ever taken. What others spend hours to etch into unmoving stone to last generations, you instantly manifest into the air itself for immediate effect. You don't need a barrier that will last for two years in two weeks, you need one that will last two seconds now. Your only limit is what you can design.
...It was literally crafted for Lilly. It's going to have a very well-tailored pitch.[Quickwrit Stenovoker] comes after [Temporal Redeemer] for example and goes back to the earlier type of description:
Then pick literally any other, [Overlooked Maiden], or [Obstinate Rejection] for example:...It was literally crafted for Lilly. It's going to have a very well-tailored pitch.
I don't see how those are structurally different from the first Ethea we were offered in their description style.[Overlooked Maiden] (Common): (Flow)
You are exceptional. You know it, the evidence is clearly written on the wall for anyone bothering to look. Yet time and time again no one even considers you might be more than meets the eye. Each uncovered peculiarity is immediately presumed to be your sole defining feature. When something of note is discovered, you are presumed too young or naïve to contribute to the discussion. This is the story of your life, zero to twelve. So be it, ignorance and assumption have been your chains since birth, but you will make your bindings theirs. Be passed over in plain sight, dismissed from suspicion with casual ease. Witnesses won't be able to place your face. After-action reports will conflict with each other. You are the Forgotten Enigma, less than wind.
[Obstinate Rejection] (Rare): (Oath)
Your commitment is a razor-sharp edge, a crushing force, a scything glaive. You will not be deterred from your beliefs. You cannot be convinced to relent. If the whole world disagrees than it is the whole world that must be corrected for their error. Every denial armours you further, every dismissal further hones your blade. The words that have hurt you are now your sticks and stones, break their bones at your leisure.
Because they contain facts about the Ethea's powers. Stuff Lilly really doesn't quite have any way to know. (...I'm reasonably certain that I've somehow mangled the grammar on this word the thread has completely made up.)I don't see how those are structurally different from the first Ethea we were offered in their description style.
lol, If you want the official QM canon than at first I used Ethos as both a singular and plural before eventually transitioning to Ethos being singular and Ethea being plural.(...I'm reasonably certain that I've somehow mangled the grammar on this word the thread has completely made up.)
It is, QM has a quote here somewhere when I asked if taking an ethos would make more advanced versions less likely to show up, he said how most ethos aren't like Namesake and Truth in Name being just more and less advanced versions of each other...Also, I really have to wonder if that "Namesake is a lesser version of Truth in Name" confidence Lilly had back when she last saw either is actually well-founded.
Epic or Ionic ancient Greek:...Still wondering where we got Ethea from if it wasn't a particularly persistent typo.
Here's the quote I said I'd go get now that I have timeHaving [Brave Blood] will not prevent you from choosing [Blessed Armsman].
[Brave Blood] and [Blessed Armsman] are not related to each other. Very few Ethos have rarity progressions like [Namesake] and [Truth in Name] do. It is entirely possible to pick up a broad Ethos based around a general concept, then pick up a more unique Ethos that focuses on a particular subset down the line.
There is a slight negative pressure to the unlock chance of Ethos of which you already possess a similar expression. But there is a lot of room for doubling up, a set of three Mana based, Pithe based and Essence based Ethos could all be selected and only moderately reduce the chance of each others availability. But if you picked up an Ethos something along the lines of 'master swordsman', expect to probably never have a sword based Ethos come up again, the concept is too narrow.
...I wonder if there's higher rarities along the lines of [Truth in Name].
I liked Ethea from my googling more than the other options because it is an already established pattern in English for some words to be pluralized that way. Ethae felt a bit more archaic and didn't gel as nicely with all the more modern sounding words constantly surrounding it....Still wondering where we got Ethea from if it wasn't a particularly persistent typo. I think it technically should be Ethae. But spellcheck doesn't like that one either, so I have no idea why I do.
I'm just here thinking "the extra L in Lilly's name is symbolic of the Ls she keeps taking".