Check me if I'm wrong, but... getting a 35 when you start with a 32.8 isn't all that hard, right? I mean, I don't know the mathing for this quest particularly well, but that seems like a roll that's still likely to succeed. Am I missing something?
Yes, but getting there requires an enormous investment of resources, and passing up several other options that would auto-pass.
Additionally, his plan is completely dependent on succeeding at that roll, if the roll fails, other actions will then dangerously over-extend us, arresting people without any support network to allow sustaining those arrests, and without gaining bonuses for next turn. It also would mean not taking actions to thwart the traitors actions to overturn the arrests we have already made. It's like making a double or nothing bet - but when we are already ahead and have no reason to take such a risk.
Why make an all or nothing bet that isn't a sure thing when you have other options that are a sure bet, and that while not providing complete victory in a single turn, would significantly advance the case and leave us well prepared for next turn?
I mean, his plan was originally built around making this a certain victory - but the mechanics do not allow what he thought they would. Shouldn't that mean reconsidering the commitment to such a plan?
Last edited: