Genolution
Hello there
- Location
- [DATA EXPUNGED]
Honestly it likely it been worst if Hasley was there. Say Nagato getting a golden bb on, I don't know Jersey? Or one of the other ships...
So you never risk your forces, ever? A fleet is meant to fight the enemy's fleet. I can see not getting involved in a losing battle, but in this case the Americans had every advantage. They had a superior surface force that was supported by a fuckload of airpower that could easily maul Center Force in the form of all those fleet carriers.
By that logic, the Red Army shouldn't have fought Kursk because the Wehrmacht could've gotten lucky and won. In war, you risk assets. If Jersey took a magazine hit? Well, that's war, you need to put your forces in harms way to achieve the goal, and the goal in war is to destroy the enemy's ability to fight, something that is impossible without fighting. In this case, they had a golden opportunity to smash a whole bunch of the IJN's surface force that could have done a lot of damage, and to not take that chance because they could have taken casualties? The trade off would have been much better than A few heavy cruisers.
If Halsey hadn't been there and the Taffies had failed, then the way to the landing beaches, the undefended 7th Fleet, and a whole bunch of support ships would have been clear (although really there is a chance Rear Admiral Oldendorf's force from Surigao Strait could have stopped Center Force long enough).
No it logical.
More ship there equals more people.
Which means more chance for something to go wrong.
And so on and so forth...
Would it have been a lost? No.
Would have been more bloody for us? Odds are YES.
What I'm trying to say Letye wasn't a massive failure.
A screw up? Yes.
But what everyone forgets is that those ships we last are consider EXPANDABLE.
Literally even those sailors know that. You know what my grandpa once told me?
DE= Destroyed Easily
CVE= Combustible, Vulnerable, Explosive/EXPANDABLE
DD=... I actually forgot this one but they were called tincans for a reason.
Now the IJN lost three heavy cruisers. That consider a fair trade off.
You seem to be neglecting the big picture, in that what could have been lost is more than what was engaged at Samar. Behind the Taffies were several thousand US Army and Marines on transports and a whole bunch of supply ships. That was what could have been lost, not just those tin cans. When you have a force defending a city, for example, you don't just factor in the troops in losses, you also consider the cost of losing the city. And all that behind the Taffies was most certainly not expendable--why else do you think they made that last stand rather than bugging out?