Even though the world is vastly more tolerant of LGTBQ relationships than it was twenty years ago, gay male relationships are still one of the more marginalized in society as they are seen to go against 'standard' male behaviour in a broadly heterosexual and patriarchal culture, while lesbian relationships are less visible and therefore less threatening.
That there is vastly less backlash against f/f is true even when it is visible, though. For example, in the late 90s/early 00s there was a wave of series which wanted to push borders by showing a same-sex kiss in one episode, and don't get me wrong, that was a good thing - but it is notable that it were always,
always f/f kisses. F/F simply is simply is more acceptable, period, yes. I think it has to do with the fact that m/m challenges particularly
male gender norms and, well, we still kinda do live in a male-dominated society. Male gender norms being attacked hence draws a more severe response than female gender norms being attacked, especially as female gender norms have been softened up by decades of female emancipation anyway, while this process has barely touched male gender norms[1] . But beyond that, there is also the concept of fragile masculinity: That a small slip is enough for a man to not really be seen as a man anymore. Not a "real man" (tm), anyway. There doesn't really seem to be something comparable for women.
As a result, acceptance of m/m and f/f is skewed. There are studies about that, and they all show a considerable larger amount of the population accepts f/f than m/m - and oh, the difference is always among male responders. Some men feel threatened by m/m, in ways women don't feel threatened by f/f. It stands to reason this holds true in a more diluted form for fictional depiction of such relationships as well - so even if people accept m/m relationships as such IRL, they still do dislike those depictions.
But yes, that is in fact IMO the root of homophobia: For some reason, some people get
really, really uncomfortable when their established gender norms get questioned. Which I guess, ties back to why they want to present their established gender norms as biotruths, see the EVA idea thread.
It's really a somewhat pathetic reaction, when you think about it:
"All men are X"
*shows example of a man not being X*
"...rahrgle garble not natural how dare you not a man" etc etc
Some people take being proven simply
wrong on some deeply held views really badly. It's the problem of deeply held but barely examined views and attitudes. And really,
@Alex , that really is on
them, then. On those people who just can't
deal with it. Don't bow to their attitudes, because they are
wrong. You can, basically, write them off - or of course hope that exposing them to m/m will make at least some of them reconsider. In any case, there is not much sense in losing sleep over the thought of losing those people.
[1]which is how we ended up with women having to balance family and career - because women having a career is okay now that the female gender norms have been relaxed, but a stay at home day is much less so, because the male gender norms have not really become much relaxed.
whereas the yuri genre stereotype of being written by horny men is much less mocked.
Hm, not sure about that. I'd even say the titilation aspect of yuri gets mocked
more, while yaoi gets mocked more for how the stereotypical teenage girl writers have no clue about such things as anatomy, relationship dynamics, etc. In any case, Yuri actually does seem to have an audience more balanced between actually LGBT women and straight men, compared to yaoi, which seems to be near exclusively be marketed to straight girls/women (on the commercial level, that is, so not fanfic, but it is still telling).
in those fanworks, both Kaworu and Shinji are almost universally written (and drawn) to heavily emphasize feminine traits rather than masculine ones
Well, guilty as charged, I guess. In a way. Neither Kaworu nor Shinji are exactly epitomes of classical masculinity, after all.
Which means, you have an opportunity to do it better,
@Alex Go for it!
I feel that that is why a lot of fics where relationships play a big role (particularly male/male) come under fire: The authors don't show or explain how we got to that alternate interpretation, they just go with it without showing any reasoning why. In the context of NGE, that means that the requirement is to show how/why any relationship got off the ground, as Anno smothered them all in their cribs.
Well, but that is true of
all relationships in NGE, be it A/S, R/S or K/S. In fact, I'd argue if it weren't for the Tabris problem, K/S has the easiest chance of getting off the ground and nearly already was there. And yet, A/S (the most, ah, complicated of those relationships) gets a free pass, R/S is mostly only denounced for the incest fear, and hell, even A/R gets a free pass as well despite having absolutely
no grounding in canon... so there is no reason why K/S should need an extra justification.