Here's a new omake called "The Moscow incident through the prism of the American press". I hope you enjoy reading this little work.
The Soviets revolt against their corrupt government !
Our reporter Mathias Sampson, who initially came to Moscow to report on the transformations underway in the modernizing Soviet capital, undoubtedly witnessed the first breaches in the monolith of oppression constituted by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, under popular pressure demanding a real and profound democratization of Soviet political and social life.
On August 17, 1965, our journalist witnessed a huge crowd of Muscovites marching towards the centers of Soviet power. Although peaceful, the march was nonetheless accompanied by numerous slogans shouted by the crowd and written on crudely assembled placards. Based on these elements and a few anonymous testimonials collected from proud Soviet democrats, our journalist was able to glean some information about the reasons behind this spontaneous movement. This citizens' march is mainly a denunciation of the system by the denunciation of the endemic corruption reigning at the top of the Soviet government, and of how little regard this same government has for the opinions and real situation of Soviet citizens living in Moscow. Indeed, for several years now, the latter have been grappling with massive changes in their living environment and feel that the fruits of growth are very unevenly distributed between the Soviet elites and the humble rank-and-file workers. As a result, they are calling for a better distribution of growth, and for Soviet citizens' grievances to be better addressed by their government.
Moreover, the reason for this demonstration was not solely one of social justice, since the people interviewed reported galloping inflation in the face of insufficient or even stagnant wages: thus sharply reducing their standard of living and purchasing power.
Nevertheless, the Soviet government was quick to react with its usual brutality to any movement of democratization within the "people's democracies", as our journalist witnessed a massive deployment of military and police personnel whose aim was undoubtedly to repress this courageous march in accordance with Politburo orders. Despite this menacing deployment of force, the Soviet civilians did not lose their cool, as they were content to occupy the ground in front of the forces of the Soviet repressive apparatus before dispersing in the days that followed. It is also important to note that the police forces did not stand idly by, as they proceeded to brutally arrest several dozen protesters, who are no doubt still being tortured to extract information from them at the time of writing.
Faced with this very real desire for change on the part of Muscovites and, no doubt, other Soviet citizens, the Soviet government was forced to react strongly in favor of purchasing power with a significant wage increase - announced in the wake of this protest in Pravda. The same can be said of corruption, since the Soviet government will no doubt have to order tougher, more thorough anti-corruption investigations and even heavy prison sentences to keep Soviet citizens happy.
Despite these efforts, this event will have weakened the already tenuous bond of trust between the Soviet elites and their population, according to our specialist on Soviet realities Tristan Russo, and it cannot be ruled out that the Communist Party's grip will waver even further if the fight against corruption does not sufficiently live up to the population's expectations, or if the significant growth hitherto experienced by the Soviet Union were to stall or even turn negative - thus accentuating the day-to-day difficulties of the Soviet people.
Liam Byrd, Chicago Tribune, August 20, 1965