Attempting to Fulfill the Plan MNKh Edition

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Using a legal paradox exploit to subjugate all other sources of governmental power is absolutely a coup.

The Soviet system is damn weird, and even weirder in this timeline, but it does still have some power dynamics and separations which this would massively violate. This option isn't even all that different in essence to how Stalin wielded power.
The whole thing literally relies on other politicians involved playing ball. Half of Plan Backstab is courting Vor, which together with Seym constitute 2 of the 3 big players.
 
[X]Plan Ryzzing our Way to Victory (Vorotnikov/Ryzkhov Duopoly)
This is probably a fairly sensible option
[X]Plan The Most Magnificent Backstab
I don't think we have it, whatever "it" is, but it would be glorious if we pulled it off
 
I agree that it probably wouldn't lead to a MoD hardcoup, but that's because both Ryzh and Voro can just move through SupSov and dismiss Bala and his funny ideas.
 
Because being favored by anyone requires pushing actual major reforms that step on the power bases or violate some dearly held ideological brainworm of the other two. Neutrality requires doing very little actual reforms and just making mouth noises, if we start seriously changing the way things work we will start seriously changing something that somebody currently likes and doesn't want changed across the Big 3.

Well, we could actually make a plan focused on neutral options that left us with positive outlooks across the board.

I also think we need to consider the delta in relationships. For example, Vorotnikov moving from -1 to -3 is much less of a deal than Ryzhkov moving from 4 to -3, so even though the ending relationship is the same, I think Ryzhkov would be much more upset than Vorotnikov in this scenario.

By contrast, Semyonov starts at -5, so him moving to -4 would probably mean Balakirev had a better overall relation with him than a Ryzhkov whose relation had dropped to -3.

And I really don't think that everyone thinking that Balakirev is a bit of an ass is going to be good for the ministry. I think that will isolate him politically at a time when we are going to need to deal with the oil crisis soon.

Your point about brainworms is one that I have had in mind... I thought that I had avoided picking any options that upset any player too much. But... Maybe we should only take nice options from players that we fully back.

So no pushing unions and pushing economic commissions at the same time, that sort of thing.

Because taking a completely incoherent political/economic line is just going to get Balakirev thrown out on his ass?

Well, what do you think is coherent here?

I don't trust the unions tbh, and it seems foolish to focus our efforts on supporting them instead of destroying the reason our workers need a union, namely the capitalist system we have allowed to flourish inside the union. But I get that their important to have especially atm, could be useful in the future politically ig, as long as they remain inside the party

So you want capitalism where you are the capitalist, got it.

Without unions, the workers of the Soviet Union are subjects of the ministry, not its masters.

Regards,

fasquardon
 
Well, we could actually make a plan focused on neutral options that left us with positive outlooks across the board.

I also think we need to consider the delta in relationships. For example, Vorotnikov moving from -1 to -3 is much less of a deal than Ryzhkov moving from 4 to -3, so even though the ending relationship is the same, I think Ryzhkov would be much more upset than Vorotnikov in this scenario.

By contrast, Semyonov starts at -5, so him moving to -4 would probably mean Balakirev had a better overall relation with him than a Ryzhkov whose relation had dropped to -3.

And I really don't think that everyone thinking that Balakirev is a bit of an ass is going to be good for the ministry. I think that will isolate him politically at a time when we are going to need to deal with the oil crisis soon.

Your point about brainworms is one that I have had in mind... I thought that I had avoided picking any options that upset any player too much. But... Maybe we should only take nice options from players that we fully back.

So no pushing unions and pushing economic commissions at the same time, that sort of thing.
I think a neutral plan needs to do that, and mot look like we are being too greedy and look like a Voznesensky.

I'd say make a ally outside the Troika, appoint one of the deputies people don't care about too much, don't attack the power base of any of the three too much and try to stay lean/not try too many things at once.

I will see about trying to cook up something that makes sense for a neutral option.
 
Well, we could actually make a plan focused on neutral options that left us with positive outlooks across the board.

I also think we need to consider the delta in relationships. For example, Vorotnikov moving from -1 to -3 is much less of a deal than Ryzhkov moving from 4 to -3, so even though the ending relationship is the same, I think Ryzhkov would be much more upset than Vorotnikov in this scenario.

By contrast, Semyonov starts at -5, so him moving to -4 would probably mean Balakirev had a better overall relation with him than a Ryzhkov whose relation had dropped to -3.

And I really don't think that everyone thinking that Balakirev is a bit of an ass is going to be good for the ministry. I think that will isolate him politically at a time when we are going to need to deal with the oil crisis soon.

Your point about brainworms is one that I have had in mind... I thought that I had avoided picking any options that upset any player too much. But... Maybe we should only take nice options from players that we fully back.

So no pushing unions and pushing economic commissions at the same time, that sort of thing.



Well, what do you think is coherent here?



So you want capitalism where you are the capitalist, got it.

Without unions, the workers of the Soviet Union are subjects of the ministry, not its masters.

Regards,

fasquardon
No, I worry about the unions because a transition to socialism would break thier power as much as it would the capitalists, as unions are fundamentally a tool for managing capitalism. That and to be honest it kinda feels like an admission of defeat to do it as the soviets
 
Honestly? I think that all these plans that try to balance between 2 of the 3, or that try to faction build while moderately pissing off all 3 of them, are a mistake. We should've just picked one, back him to the hilt and cross our fingers that our patron can do the heavy political maneuvering for us.

Are there even any plans like that?
 
Well, so I can have something happy to think about before I take a quiz and die, also because it has a bit of a lead now and am feeling the desire to behold glory.

Vote Called For:
[X]Plan Ryzzing our Way to Victory (Vorotnikov/Ryzkhov Duopoly)
-[X]Deputy:
--[X]Support Ryzhkov's Choice(Deputy) (-5/-10/5)
-[X]Neutral:
--[X]Reach out to Delegates (1/1/-2)
--[X]Commit to Moscow Renovations (3/1/2)
--[X]Leverage Central Asian Politicians (-3/-1/-1)
--[X]Ally with Zimyanin (2/-3/-2)
-[X]Vorotnikov
--[X]Expand Agricultural Development (2/0/0)
--[X]Uphold the Mikoyanist System (6/-5/-3)
--[X]Discuss Cultural Production (3/-4/-2)
-[X]Ryzhkov
--[X]Reform Domestic Patent Laws (0/-2/3)
--[X]Soviet-Japanese Enterprises (-3/-2/4)

Edit: Lets rock, its time for swan lake and for nothing to happen in Moscow

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rJoB7y6Ncs&vl=en
Blackstar threw 1 100-faced dice. Reason: Pointman Bala Total: 87
87 87
Blackstar threw 2 100-faced dice. Reason: Vor-Ryz Coordination Total: 124
55 55 69 69
Blackstar threw 3 100-faced dice. Reason: Party Explusions(Low Yes) BVR Total: 114
76 76 18 18 20 20
Blackstar threw 3 100-faced dice. Reason: Extraordinary CC Total: 134
2 2 95 95 37 37
Blackstar threw 2 100-faced dice. Reason: State Satbility, Low Bad Total: 88
33 33 55 55
 
Last edited:
No, I worry about the unions because a transition to socialism would break thier power as much as it would the capitalists, as unions are fundamentally a tool for managing capitalism. That and to be honest it kinda feels like an admission of defeat to do it as the soviets

Ahh yeah. I do get that unions also want to preserve and extend their own power to some degree. But I also think that we're going to need state capitalism for a long time to come and we need to have limits on the power of the managers who oversee those state assets.

Honestly? I think that all these plans that try to balance between 2 of the 3, or that try to faction build while moderately pissing off all 3 of them, are a mistake. We should've just picked one, back him to the hilt and cross our fingers that our patron can do the heavy political maneuvering for us.

Are there even any plans like that?

I can't find one. Even the backstab plan puts alot of effort into making nice with Vorotnikov.
Unfortunately, I do think the best play for picking a side is Ryzhkov. Going all in on Semyonov means trying to dropkick the entire SupSov, and I just cannot imagine that going well.

And my keenness for union reform means that I have so far been left trying to make a neutral play work.

However, the player base is rejecting unions anyway. I'll have a try at making a plan to back one faction in a serious way.

However, looking at the vote tally, the plan in the lead is "Ryzzing our Way to Victory" which I think is an utterly awful plan. Like, seriously, allying with Zimyanin and giving Vorotnikov consessions in the cultural sphere while also giving Ryzhkov the deputy spot? Remember Ryzhkov is allied to the culture ministry, going so hard on the right while threatening culture is going to make Ryzhkov pissed off enough to give his new ally in the deputy slot a quick promotion.

Just in case the vote is called before I come out with a plan that picks a side, I am going to approval vote a plan that I think is at least not suicide in the dumbest way.

I encourage people to join me in killing the "Ryzzing our Way to Victory" plan with fire.

[X]For the unions!
[X]Plan Talk Is Cheap

EDIT:
Well, so I can have something happy to think about before I take a quiz and die, also because it has a bit of a lead now and am feeling the desire to behold glory.

...

I thought I was being paranoid sticking in an approval vote just in case you called it in the next few minuites and you still ninja'd me!

That is really annoying, but also hillarious. Clearly I should have learned better from papa Stalin.

One can never be too paranoid.

Also, good luck in the quiz.

Regards,

fasquardon
 
Last edited:
Well, so I can have something happy to think about before I take a quiz and die, also because it has a bit of a lead now and am feeling the desire to behold glory.

Vote Called For:
[X]Plan Ryzzing our Way to Victory (Vorotnikov/Ryzkhov Duopoly)
-[X]Deputy:
--[X]Support Ryzhkov's Choice(Deputy) (-5/-10/5)
-[X]Neutral:
--[X]Reach out to Delegates (1/1/-2)
--[X]Commit to Moscow Renovations (3/1/2)
--[X]Leverage Central Asian Politicians (-3/-1/-1)
--[X]Ally with Zimyanin (2/-3/-2)
-[X]Vorotnikov
--[X]Expand Agricultural Development (2/0/0)
--[X]Uphold the Mikoyanist System (6/-5/-3)
--[X]Discuss Cultural Production (3/-4/-2)
-[X]Ryzhkov
--[X]Reform Domestic Patent Laws (0/-2/3)
--[X]Soviet-Japanese Enterprises (-3/-2/4)

Congratulations everyone, for perhaps the third time we have successfully navigated Soviet politics.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top