@DragonParadox, you mind doing an interlude now?
This plan seems like something needing much thought and snowfire's ideas put into it.
[]
It's only been about an hour since the update, though I'll think about an interlude, sure.
@DragonParadox, you mind doing an interlude now?
This plan seems like something needing much thought and snowfire's ideas put into it.
[]
[X] Inform laternbearers of Oldtown and your Ironborn allies of the newfound way to treat the physical corruption of Illithids via holy waters of Merling King on Toad Isle, for you all stand against the Mindflayers.
-[X] If needed, offer help for transportation across waters, which clearly won't be safe for such individuals.
-[X] Also warn of the perils such treatment carries, and offer powerful magical healing for worse cases out there.
Under what name?So, the first is probably best left to before we move in.
The second carries some significant risk, as we aren't Garin.
So the third it is, as long as they don't divine for them knowing about them, only attacking. Even then, we should be able to Wild Arcana a Mindblank, or lend a ring, to that old hardcore fellow we met.
I'm busy right now, so just a quick and simple plan:
[X] Contact the Lantern Bearers
-[X] Look for the one you met, he seemed reasonable enough. Do Mindblank him before you reveal any critical information, however.
-[X] Do reveal to him the situation as you know it, and ask about his plans .
The Lantern Bearer we know, what identity did we use when we interacted with him? I can't recall.
We know him as Viserys, so I didn't feel the need to specify.
Also, if you are unhappy with it, just propose your own.@DragonParadox, you mind doing an interlude now?
This plan seems like something needing much thought and snowfire's ideas put into it.
[]
Ah, that one.
Agreed.Why would the current plan hinder us in any way?
We can reasonably explain that we've discovered one of our enemies is planning to besmirch our name, and moved to stop it. Along the way, freaking Deep Ones living next door, because things are fucked up.
And only our point of contactn needs to know, anyway.
Tbh, trying to insert Dywen here is weird, and smacks me as overcomplicating things.
We have perfectly valid reasons to be here, and this shows we are definitely enemies with Tiamat.
That is decidedly not the character I was aiming for when writing him. Buffing and healing out of combat is one thing, but having him go into battle would be entirely unfitting.As I said before when this was brought up. Any man of reason would be driven to battle against the pawns of the Bitch Queen. That Dywen is a man of power - and he is - just makes it more in line with how he's been shown. He does not appreciate combat, sure. But don't even try to tell me he's a pacifist. He follows the Old Gods, after all. In combat, I'd use him as a buff source (Fire Shield and Magic Army) and a source of counterspelling/removing the protections of Tiamat's servants. The argument here isn't to make him fight, not like we do, but to have him be there to help. That's in line with the persona that's been built for him as far as I can see it.
The rest of the party goes in against the mansion and tries to capture everyone they can as quietly as possible. If we can, make it appear as if the rest of the Golden Company agents just up and ran at the first sign of trouble/after the servants of their slavemistress fell.
That is decidedly not the character I was aiming for when writing him. Buffing and healing out of combat is one thing, but having him go into battle would be entirely unfitting.
It's called being a character with his own motivations instead of a heroic fantasy cardboard cutout that is shoved in whenever "the circumstances are dire enough" (read: whenever The Call To Adventure rings).What came through to me was decidedly not a pacifist by any definition of the term, Azel. I'm fine keeping him back from frontlining, hell, I'm find with restricting his aid to what you've suggested here, buffs and healing. But I don't really see the basis of his refusal to engage in combat when circumstances are dire enough to make it necessary. Plan follows:
It's called being a character with his own motivations instead of a heroic fantasy cardboard cutout that is shoved in whenever "the circumstances are dire enough" (read: whenever The Call To Adventure rings).
[X] Keep Dywen out of this. He is vastly more useful as a peaceful preacher attending the conclave then as another facade to lob combat spells around from.
They probably will be absorbed into our own peace keeping/law enforcement/monster hunting apparatuses, but that doesn't mean we should overlook them.I dunno implicating the faith with two different 'demonic' factions seems like it would go a long way towards humbling the Seven, and to be blunt I don't see the worth of the lantern bearers, ultimately they're the equivalent of a regional Inquisition branch or the silver eye and they're bound to be absorbed into that or dispersed when we finally take Westeros. In the campaign itself they'd do as much good fighting on our side as the Watch that is to say it would cost us a lot more in the long run and leave a critical area open to supernatural enemies.
1. Please explain where your interpretation is coming from then. So far, we used Dywen to chat up Grafton, break up a lynch-mob in the Riverlands with words alone, and help an old lord in the Iron Isles. At no point was Dywen involved in any combat. Your assertion that "no on with power would X" is a personal opinion and shoehorning a default character trait in. You basically want to force him into some cardboard hero roll, because different people are not allowed to have different reactions to a situation.Dear god are you even listening. This is not how you've written the man. It might be what you intended, but it's not how you wrote him. No one with power and a decent conscience (which he has) can ignore horror in front of them.
I'm not trying to turn him into a combat frontliner of any sort, no matter how much you persist to imply I am. At most I'm saying dispels. That's literally it.
Please actually engage with me before throwing what certainly feels like a not-so-veiled insult vote. You could start by actually explaining how his motivations prevent action here instead of, again, making a barely single line reference to them.