Yss is a god of death, which mean he's an Aspect of the many faced god, considering how much he likes us, such problems can probably be solved, by him telling the Faceless men that it's cool, and I don't think Yss has any objection to people living unnaturally long.I'd rather not dance around this with half-assed, "Well we're not going to live forever" when we're very clearly intending to live past our allotted lifespan, along with arranging the same for our companions and anyone close to us via Cyclic Reincarnation. Everyone else isn't a dragon, so that argument doesn't hold up.
Not sub-human so much as the morality they are made with start false, just like a young AI's mind right after creation, is whatever it's creator want it to be, only with time to learn do it's mind truly become it's own, in that same vein an Outsider start out being just an automaton, and you can only judge it on it's acts, after it has gotten the opportunity to be something different.By that logic outsiders are morally sub-human, an assessment which is itself morally problematic for obvious reasons.
I would be more interested in their policy on non-undead death-avoidance.A polite way of asking him about the parameters of their independent activity while keeping up the intrigued foreigner act.
I wonder if the subterranean pool and anti-shrine could be rebuilt and Consecrated in order to gain the favor of the Faceless Men?
[X] Plan Fishing For Information
-[X] "Is that so? Your order is not known for how talkative it's members are, so I will consider this high flattery of my person."
-[X] "One question above all others I would like to know the answer too, both for what I heard about the servants of the Many Faced and for the circumstances of our meeting."
-[X] "'Valar Morgulis' they say, yet there are those who seek and sometimes managed to escape these words. I have heard that your order hunts these people, not for the sake of clients, but in the name of your god."
-[X] "So if you may, answer me this. Why where you send now, when the creature that you wanted to slay was haunting this house for generations? By what measure does your god or order decree that one undying is left to his own device, but another slain by your hand?"
A polite way of asking him about the parameters of their independent activity while keeping up the intrigued foreigner act.
That's a very human metric to judge them by.Yss is a god of death, which mean he's an Aspect of the many faced god, considering how much he likes us, such problems can probably be solved, by him telling the Faceless men that it's cool, and I don't think Yss has any objection to people living unnaturally long.
Not sub-human so much as the morality they are made with start false, just like a young AI's mind right after creation, is whatever it's creator want it to be, only with time to learn do it's mind truly become it's own, in that same vein an Outsider start out being just an automaton, and you can only judge it on it's acts, after it has gotten the opportunity to be something different.
It's only once they get to truly interact with people of all kinds of morals, that they begin to be able to be judged for their acts, because it's only at that point that their morality is truly their own, and not just an extension of their home plane.
For all Outsiders are created fully grown and with a full mind, morally they are still children, just parroting the morals of their parents, it's only when they have been exposed to other morals and the reasons behind them, that their moral stance can be said to be their own.
As I said it's like with AI's, they are created with a lot of knowledge and rules, yet it's only once they get the opportunity to make their own observations, that their choices begin to become their own.
Dear Santa,
for Christmas, my only wish is for the following persons to die in a fire:
- Tywin Lannister
- Gregor Clegane
- Armory Lorch
Love,
Rheanys Targaryen
P.S.: Other kinds of death are fine too!
P.P.S.: Can I watch?
By that logic outsiders are morally sub-human, an assessment which is itself morally problematic for obvious reasons.
I'm human I don't have any other metric to judge them by.
The question is explicitly about "the undying" in general. I don't want to tip our hand right now by a too specific question.I would be more interested in their policy on non-undead death-avoidance.
Is he really?Yss is a god of death, which mean he's an Aspect of the many faced god, considering how much he likes us, such problems can probably be solved, by him telling the Faceless men that it's cool, and I don't think Yss has any objection to people living unnaturally long.
I meant more that they will believe he's an aspect of their god, which should mean if his Avatar say it's okay, unless another death god descend to say it's not, then that's it, they acknowledge it's okay.Is he really?
Just because they claim that the Many-Faced God represents all death gods doesn't mean it's true. There is nothing to go off of other than their word on the matter. It reeks of R'hllor claiming that he is the one true god, and that all that is good springs from him and all that is evil is from the Great Other.
Just because a god (much less their servants) says something does not make it fact.
This line of reasoning is extremely flawed, as you are assuming that each human reaches a stage where they can make a informed decision about their personal morals. As it happens though, most people never reach this stage, in part because it is considered an unacceptable topic to talk about faith, morality and politics in most settings. The other issue is the good old nature vs. nuture debate and modern science has found strong evidence that the tendency of a persons morals is very much dictated by nature.Not sub-human so much as the morality they are made with start false, just like a young AI's mind right after creation, is whatever it's creator want it to be, only with time to learn do it's mind truly become it's own, in that same vein an Outsider start out being just an automaton, and you can only judge it on it's acts, after it has gotten the opportunity to be something different.
It's only once they get to truly interact with people of all kinds of morals, that they begin to be able to be judged for their acts, because it's only at that point that their morality is truly their own, and not just an extension of their home plane.
For all Outsiders are created fully grown and with a full mind, morally they are still children, just parroting the morals of their parents, it's only when they have been exposed to other morals and the reasons behind them, that their moral stance can be said to be their own.
As I said it's like with AI's, they are created with a lot of knowledge and rules, yet it's only once they get the opportunity to make their own observations, that their choices begin to become their own.
I'm pretty sure the Faceless Men will be taking their cues from the Many-Faced God rather than Yss.I meant more that they will believe he's an aspect of their god, which should mean if his Avatar say it's okay, unless another death god descend to say it's not, then that's it, they acknowledge it's okay.
TL;DRThis line of reasoning is extremely flawed, as you are assuming that each human reaches a stage where they can make a informed decision about their personal morals. As it happens though, most people never reach this stage, in part because it is considered an unacceptable topic to talk about faith, morality and politics in most settings. The other issue is the good old nature vs. nuture debate and modern science has found strong evidence that the tendency of a persons morals is very much dictated by nature.
Furthermore, as you keep bringing up hypothetically sapient AIs, in my professional experience, any kind of thinking apparatus is very much constrained by it's underlying infrastructure, but a human-like intelligence would automatically imply the ability to reason and make judgments autonomously. Without this ability, you have no true sapience, just a clever Construct that is bound solely by it's premade, mental structure.
Therefore, you either assume that Outsiders start as sub-sapient, or they start on the same level as a human. The existence or lack of prior experience certainly has an impact on the complexity and nature of a beings thoughts, but the fundamental part is if it is capable of having them in the first place.
They start like humans, which mean they start on the child level morally, sure they are exponentially more clever and knowledgeable children, but that's still what they are children, they start out parrotting their parents, it takes time and challenges for them to grow up.This line of reasoning is extremely flawed, as you are assuming that each human reaches a stage where they can make a informed decision about their personal morals. As it happens though, most people never reach this stage, in part because it is considered an unacceptable topic to talk about faith, morality and politics in most settings. The other issue is the good old nature vs. nuture debate and modern science has found strong evidence that the tendency of a persons morals is very much dictated by nature.
Furthermore, as you keep bringing up hypothetically sapient AIs, in my professional experience, any kind of thinking apparatus is very much constrained by it's underlying infrastructure, but a human-like intelligence would automatically imply the ability to reason and make judgments autonomously. Without this ability, you have no true sapience, just a clever Construct that is bound solely by it's premade, mental structure.
Therefore, you either assume that Outsiders start as sub-sapient, or they start on the same level as a human. The existence or lack of prior experience certainly has an impact on the complexity and nature of a beings thoughts, but the fundamental part is if it is capable of having them in the first place.
Sure if the Many-Faced God cares to personally weight in on the matter, but Yss word as an aspect of the Many-Faced God, supercedes anything short of the Many-Faced God personally letting their judgment be known.I'm pretty sure the Faceless Men will be taking their cues from the Many-Faced God rather than Yss.
Sure they can be held accountable just as much, but there's less point in hating them than there's in hating mortals, at least in my opinion.TL;DR
The default Outsider is no more or less capable of being held accountable for his choices then a random Planetosi peasant.
This argument is pointless, because the outsiders who get to go on the missions to the prime material plane (the ones we meet) are all likely to be several thousand years old.My argument is that for all Outsiders spring fully formed with a mind, a new young Outsider is still a child at heart, for all that they are much more adultlike than human children.
You hear the words spoken and those yet unspoken also. The assassin wishes to cultivate you, or rather master Lieu, as a resource for his order.