Cologne is not the sole leader of her village. If a majority of the rest disagree, then it won't happen. We can't assume the opinions of the other Elders. For all we know, they'll agree to change things to get the village evacuated, then be really lackluster on enforcing the "ban" on the Kisses, if they actually bother to officially change the laws.
Technically true, but also... While this is "real world" this is also a story. Lunaryon has been listening to us in the comments. Cologne's commentary is not just the opinion of a single elder of the village, but also a message from the author. After all, we don't KNOW the other elders. They don't exist in Ranma fiction to my knowledge.
So yes, it isn't a guarantee, but it would be highly unusual for Lunaryon to take one of our BIGGEST concerns about this situation, have one of the only known authorities on it tell us it won't be an issue, and then pull the rug from under us.
So we should go from squad leader level leadership skills straight to battalion/regiment command because we'll need large groups of people eventually? OR jump right into building/running a city without any of the support structures that cities have, potentially within the territory of a friendly nation?
Or to put it another way, we're already in AP Hell. Taking them as our clients will worsen our AP Hell until we get things sorted out or whatever. While we're in the middle of trying to stop Beryl from ending the world. Can't this wait until the turn after we shank Beryl and Metallia? We, technically, have all the time in the world to deal with the time traveler bad guys, so some AP Hell issues at that time wouldn't be so bad.
Yes but no.
See, there is a major factor you aren't accounting for. We won't be the leaders of the Amazons. This is absolutely key to my point. The Council of Elders will still exist and still run the Amazons. Bertha doesn't have enough iron to make her knuckle dusters? That will likely still be handled by Cologne just like it always was.
Think of it this way, since we want to conceive of this in a feudal manner. We are the King, the Council of Elders are the nobles. Day to day problems and concerns still go to them. It is only after that level, that we get things to handle. This is literally better than most of our other current recruitment options, because there is an established leadership that wants to join us and is competent.
And, again, we are in AP Hell. Waiting til after Beryl is silly, because we know that seconds after we blast her the Time Travelers are planning to attack us. And then we will likely hit Nehelenia. And Egypt is currently trying to assassinate Naru, and we will have to deal with China and Russia and the Knights of Oblivion have been too quiet, and and and. There will never be a stretch of peace where we will have less things to do. It won't happen.
HOWEVER, getting a large supply of people to throw at a problem? Being able to say "man, we really want to help the Oni since their mountain was blown up and collapsed... can we just send 100 amazons to help with the clean up?" is HUGE in terms of our AP Hell. I don't want to say there are no problems with this plan, but I think if we can navigate a little crunch now, we can get massive dividends down the line, when we really need them.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I feel like there's at least three groups of people voting for clientage:
Have I missed anything?
- People who want to expand our polity as quickly as possible
- People who think that doing it now is the only way the Amazons will have anything resembling safety and stability.
- People who think that failing to offer this now means alienating them in some way
Yes. People who think this is a good time, not just expanding as quickly as possible. People who find this idea *interesting*. Dealing with the idea of patronage is more interesting to me than not. People who see this as a solution to our manpower problems we consistently have.
I also don't see ANYONE voting for #3, and I barely see anyone putting it forth for #2, so I'm not sure why those are in your top three.
The structure of the options and what's been said implies that even if us offering clientage is the only way the Amazons will ever have a home again (which I suspect is NOT true), we can offer that later, once we have established that this is the case.
And I think that group 3, if anyone's in that group, is basically ignoring the actual explicit text of the update and options.
I don't think anyone has missed these points. And no one seems to support position #3