Chargone
Invisable operator
- Location
- New Zealand
Sort of, but not quite. For "neither X nor Y", X and Y must be equivalent parts of the sentence. Basically, if "allowed", the verb, is outside the neither/nor structure, X and Y share it just fine, but if it is Inside the neither/nor structure, it is part of X, meaning the Y part has no verb, and also the missing verb it should have cannot be "allowed", because this structure indicates a contrast of two different things (this interacts with other factors though, so the Preferred result is kicking the non-contrasting bits out of the neither/nor section, but sometimes that's not viable so you have to duplicate that part in both the X and the Y instead, though the main verb is the least prone to this.)
Not sure how well I'm explaining this.
Short version: it can work either way, but one way matches the rest of the sentence, while the other requires a correction to a different part of the sentence.
Last edited: